>video games will never look this detailed in your lifetime

>>378780316
Because that looks like shit
Also furshit thread saged

>>378780316
Are you sure? I could see that being possible in 20 years or so, I think.

>>378780316

cute trash panda

>>378781004
more like 5, depending on what kind of game it is

>You will not post any of the following outside of /b/

>anthropomorphic ("furry")

the rules seem pretty clear to me

>>378780316

if they are going to look like that hopefully fucking never rofl.

>>378781173
I feel like we're already pretty close with FMVs, but I was thinking for real time gameplay graphics it would take a while. Isn't there a thing about diminishing returns in technology, now? Like things are slowing down because we're running out of places to go?

File: telltale_guardians_rocket_raccoon_1_by_giuseppedirosso-db6odft[1].jpg (591KB, 1177x812px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 1177x812px

>>378781256

Rocket is video games it's ok

>>378781539
Is this game good or is it based off the movies?

File: ts2.jpg (241KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1920x1080px

Here's Toy Story 2 from 1999, do we even have any game that looks this good yet, with all the lighting, poly count, reflections and so on?

File: Screen-Shot-2017-05-09-at-9.22.17-AM[1].png (415KB, 640x446px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 640x446px

>>378781653

It's your average modern Telltale game. I gave the first chapter a 6.5/10. Has some funny moments and decent voice acting, plot isn't really set up yet.

It's not really based off anything? The characters are based off the movie but that's about it.

>>378780316
No game will ever look like that in real time unless it has a veritable army of artists, modelers, and animators working around the clock for 4-5 straight years with a multiple hundred billion dollar budget. To make something like that work in real-time isn't going to be an issue with tech, but studios will hit a hard limit in terms of man hours required to physically produce that many assets.

t. artist in the industry

>>378782000
>billion
I meant million.

>>378782000
>3D games will never exist!!!!

t. you in the 80s

>>378781782
How about Jurrassic Park, 1993 tech, almost 25 years ago, do we even have models in games that look this good?
Some of you guys are delusional at how good games will look in a gen or two.

File: Jurassic-Park-Trex-eating-Raptor.jpg (52KB, 939x523px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 939x523px

>>378782370
Forgot the damn image.

>Rocket will never cum on your face

>>378780316

how many times a day you are going to create this fucking thread?

>>378781653
It's like they never read any comics at all, just watched the first GOTG.

File: 1495314032524[1].jpg (376KB, 599x1554px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 599x1554px

>>378782738

>>378782738
Fag

>>378782992

>just watched the first GOTG

that's the public the game is focused

do you think even 10% of the movie's audience read the comics?

File: CLu3hH-WsAAa5tn[1].jpg (23KB, 441x327px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 441x327px

>>378782975

Until the video game industry improves

>>378780316
>not knowing about rendering times

Bet you have a $200 GPU poorfag.

>>378782738

>fag
>furry

choose two and go back to memeddit

>>378780316
I think you meant "your wife's children."

>>378783287

The comics are shit anyway, who cares

OP you do know that movie cgi is made with massivr render farms with hundreds of machines and it can take hours to make a single frame.

>>378783343
New Rocket comic by Seth when?

>>378780316
They will look like that in about fifteen years though.

>>378781004
It's already possible, it's all a matter of hardware and wasting a fuckton of time on it and pro tip, it's not worth it.

>>378780316
If you're talking cutscenes it is possible in 5 or 10. If you mean playable then not for another 20+

File: x5.png (408KB, 637x505px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 637x505px

The MvC Rocket design looked much better

>>378780316
CGI movies are rendered by dozens or maybe even hundreds of computers over a span of weeks or possibly months

hours of computer processing time spent rendering just seconds or minutes of video

dumb goy

File: 87654323567.png (199KB, 376x386px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 376x386px

reminder that the future is now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyaR2sSBkA

File: 526562a83af600f9059b76c44adbaf8bd578618e.jpg (157KB, 1280x970px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1280x970px

>>378780820
t. insecure safe space crybaby

>>378784895
That's a very attractive trash panda

File: 635580571452272917-XXX-GUARDIAN-GALAXY-MOV-JY-1553-70395110[1].jpg (36KB, 540x405px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 540x405px

>>378784826

Wow, HD rocks. Tell me when character models improve.

File: 1645470_Leosaeta_rocket_magassoutfitv2.png (479KB, 1000x1385px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1000x1385px

I love Rocket!

>>378784815
This. Until everyone has a rig thats at least $1000, devs will continue to make downgraded shit.

File: fuqlifmctaz26d6looka[1].jpg (62KB, 620x470px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 620x470px

>>378785204

That is my least favorite picture of him. Don't post it again.

>>378785490
no you dont understand

they're using hundreds of $1000 rigs to render the movie not in real time

movies will never match video game graphics because they dont have to be rendered in real time, and video games do, unless they're entirely on rails you can maybe prerender it, like myst games used to do

when will rocket get his own movie

>>378786004
Soon, i hope.

File: 32bab115-dc31-4d8c-9bcf-cf775ded8851.jpg (672KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 1280x1280px

is it ok to rocketpost itt

File: don_t_give_raccoon_the_gun__by_aun61-d7vdt92[1].jpg (241KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 800x800px

>>378786004

Probably after Infinity Wars comes out, which means 2020 if we're lucky.

It's already possible, but the prices wouldn't be consumer viable.

>needing entire computer farms to render movies
>thinks his 200 dollar shit box is going to render it in real time

nigger, with the way capitalism stagnates progress, expect that shit in maybe 50-70 years, youll all be dead before then so dont worry about it

rendering stuff real time is cool, though

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uasrlAaQHFw

>that voice acting

JUST

>>378786606
Unless you find a way to produce free energy and materials nobody is going to adopt a magical system where everyone works "just enough" and gets all the free shit they want.

>>378787015
capitalism is cancer of society, hence why society has stagnated so much

but go ahead and pretend outdated hardware being shilled for 10 years is totally progress

File: rocket_raccoon_montage_by_soihtuss-d7uit14[1].jpg (654KB, 1280x1652px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 1280x1652px

>>378786431

no

File: 1398137114220.png (224KB, 919x529px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 919x529px

>>378786606
>>378787281
>Capitalism causes stagnation
You are adorable

>>378780316
4 titan X were able to render real time a Luminous Engine tech demo. A single Volta GV100 was able to render in real time a FFXV Kingsglaive scene. Games can look like that but needs a lot of culling since they are not working with still frames but a whole set of props and calculations. Just look what they cold do with Uncharted 4 with a shitty PS4. If we have at least 7 teraflops GPU on the next consoles we will get really imersive graphics at 30fps 1080p

>>378780316

Consoles are holding everyone back.

>Gamora got in MvCI over Yondu

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I liked it better when he was British sounding, or whatever dialect it's supposed to be.

>>378784826
The character models still look like shit.
It looks really out of place actually.

>>378789053
>tfw no more cockney accent rocket
fuck bradley cooper

>>378782370
HAHAHAHAHA, are you retarded? These are possible since PS2 era. Simple triangles with textures and phong material. What videogames didnt had are post production over frames. Something that is possible right now.

File: c78.png (194KB, 680x418px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 680x418px

>Why do want games to look more realistic anyway? Isn't that what movies are for?

>>378789003
>Against all odds, Nova made it in
>And they went with Rich instead of Sam
I would have never guessed it, but hopefully this means Nova has big things in the works

>>378790164
>Pushing the possibilities of a visual medium is the same as muh realism

>>378789742

Both are pretty bad. I like Nolan North voicing him.

File: 1494817098042.png (279KB, 1046x1288px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1046x1288px

>>378790664
>Pushing the limits
What limits? Nobody is impressed by pretty graphics anymore, games are a visual medium but they're also an interactive one. And ultimately that's more important.

>>378780316
Graphics fags are one of the biggest blights on the industry.

You do realize this shit renders as minutes to hours per frame with hundreds to thousands of expensive GPUs working as a part of a data center. It's not that video games are behind, it's that we don't have months to render one single frame, we have 16ms and a single or sometimes dual GPU setup to do it. Not exactly comparable in any kind of fair way