What went wrong bros? Game use to be great, do you think we'll

File: 13465796034286.png (276KB, 370x555px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 370x555px

>>378769176
Don't play this shit game, play Squad instead

Nothing went wrong. The game is better than ever, and the player base, while small, is a great community and the best fun I've had online

>>378769237
this

>>378769290

>great community

>I for one welcome our chinese overlords.

Community a shit, servers a shit.

>>378769398
>one Chinese server

Really made me think

>>378769398
>>378769539

>Game only has one Chinese server

Fucking seriously?

>>378769712
That I'm aware of

>>378769398
t.never played it
>>378769290
This. Players actually are gud and not a bunch of poorfags like in Project Cuck-ality.

>>378769176
Too much spergy sperg.

>>378770038
Confirmed never played. It's essentially an adult version of battlefield. But it never veers into Arma autism except in very rare occasions of an autistic squad leader

>>378769176
It probably won't. I'd suggest getting Rising Storm 2: Vietnam instead. It's cheaper and offers a more brutal, action-packed experience. Get it now on Steam for a discounted price too.

>>378770154
When that happens the squad just makes fun of him.

>>378770325
Based David!

>>378769398
I've only ever been in ONE squad with Chinese people in it, out of literally hundreds. Where does this meme come from? On the note of player count, it's been said before plenty of times but all that matters is that you can get into a full game, it doesn't matter that there are tons of servers so long as you have enough communicating players to play with. Also Squad is one of the only games that actually has a server queue so it matters even less now. And if you are going to pretend that RS2(no it isn't a "hardcore" fps) has the same niche(not a much bigger one) than Squad you are joking yourself. People in RS2 just run around like headless chickens not communicating, that's why the best maps are Territories where the team is basically funneled into 1 or 2 objectives because when the map is open like in the helicopter one it's total chaos.

>>378769539
>Chinese server
kys

>>378770696

This. What this post says cannot be disputed

>>378770823
You have to be 18+ to post here

>>378770920
Nobody cares you slant eyed faggot.
Go play your TF2 rip off.

File: 393380_20170421003513_1.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

When will the retarded devs fix the FOV?
Who ever thought having to adjust your fov according to the situation needs to be shot.
Everybody just plays with 85.

File: 393380_20170421003553_1.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>378771235
That's 120, scoped.

File: 393380_20170421003618_1.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>378771369
That's 85, unscoped.
FOV influences how much zoom you get, down the sight and through a scope, fucking ridiculous.
Why is the zoomed fov and the normal one not separate?
Fucking quake 3 had this.

>>378771369
Most games I only play around 90 fov anyway so I never noticed.

>>378771235
>not 90

File: 393380_20170421003559_1.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>378771674
120

>>378771793
I'd play with 105 if i could, but the trade off long range is too big.
The point is the fov is a setting like resolution, you adjust it according to your monitor, it's not some fucking game play mechanic.

>>378771728
That was pretty much standard with most 4:3 monitors.

Who here hyped for British Forces? I just want some alternative Blufor to play as other than boring US Army.

File: 393380_20170421003540_1.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

105

>>378772163
How are factions going to work? Does the host choose are is it randomized on every map? I thought factions are map specific

File: 393380_20170421003610_1.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>378772216

>>378772305
Yes they are each part of a map "layer", so like objective layout and faction setup basically. I just mean I'm tired of playing as either US Army.

>>378772539
*playing as US Army.

>>378771369

Do I see correctly that this POS game doesn't even have PiP scopes?

>>378773110

Do you understand how PiP works?

>>378770325
fix your map balancing, add the god damn campaign game mode, and fix the shit tier sound effects. Then i'll recommend your game. the "spooky" gunship bullet impacts always sound right on top of you and you didn't fucking fix anything about the grenade sounds from beta, they sound like they always land right next to you. Squad/Red Orchestra 2 > rising storm 2

>>378769176
>refuse to fix AMD
>gameplay is mostly running\sitting in cover

gee i wonder

>>378773185

Yes, it has to render the scene twice but the one rendered for the scope can be at much lower resolution and fov so the performance impact isn't really thay big.

>>378772539
As a Britbong Army Medic, why? We have terrible weapon variety compared to the Yanks.

>>378773586

If it's at a lower resolution, it'll be impossible to use scopes.
If it's standard resolution, it'll kill anyone's machine as the game struggles to run smoothly as is, a UE4 issue.
FOV doesn't have any impact on performance.
Lastly, scopes are already OP as is. Those with scopes get a much higher rate of kills excluding the sniper (who is mostly just garbage for the team to lose manpower on).

>>378770679
Michael? How do I turn off the names?

>>378773615
>terrible weapon variety
Just like any other real military.
Game needs some GPMGs and working bipods.

>>378773978
Bipods are with the next update if I read correctly. I always play medic, but if the role was ever filled I'd go automatic

File: ICS-Airsoft-Gun-L86-A2-ICS-86-1.jpg (174KB, 1700x830px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1700x830px

>>378773978
Our LSW is just our regular rifle with a longer barrel and some extra spare parts. We have 1 Sniper Rifle, 1 sidearm. We did get some FN Minimi's in for Iraq but they don't see very much use compared to the L86. Every time I worked with the Yanks they seemed to use a much larger variety.

>>378774240
What about the L110A1, they already announced it.

>>378773751

If the scope covers 1/4 of your 2560*1440 screen you don't have to render the image seen through it with that resolution. It will be more like 2560*1440 main image + 900*900 scope image.

Fov has pretty significant impact on performance in most games because increasing fov increases the amount of stuff you have to render. If the scope fov is something like 5-10 degrees that doesn't have significant impact on draw calls. For example POSP 4x24 has 8 degree fov.

>>378774449
>L110A1

Seems to be another name for the FN Minimi

File: 1493427706272.png (32KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 657x527px

>>378774496
>tfw not intelligent enough for FOV discussions

>>378774549
>FN Minimi
Because that's exactly what it is, brits give their stuff always different names.

File: 1483714582040.jpg (83KB, 1024x548px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1024x548px

>>378769237
it made me laugh more than it should

>>378774496

That might work better for vehicle PiP. Afaik, Stryker/CROW interfaces are just overlaid onto the screen instead of being a proper view at a screen.
For scopes at the moment I'd much rather they just set to fixed FOV instead of based on your set FOV, so you can have both situational awareness and accuracy. The problem lies in being able to spot targets in the first place without binocs, so for that I'll still play on a low FOV.

They fucked up by making the Rally Points spammable. They are too OP and disolves the tension in the whole game. There is not punishment for dying and no reward for eliminating an enemy squad because you/they will just respawn close by. Should have just copied Project Reality Rules.

>>378774798
That's a feature, one of the devs said so.

>>378774831
Nah, I see this post a lot and I totally disagree with it. It keeps people mobile and on the move. Also it's not spammable with enemies nearby, so it has a bit of balance to it.

>>378774980
There should be a cool down time between spawn though.
Five seconds or so.

>>378769176
The shitty squad mechanic and vehicle claiming that works worse than PR was a mistake

That and project reality is fucking free and doesnt have people constantly shilling for it

>>378775873
>He likes seeing retards drive off solo with all the vital vehicles

Although I partially agree. I'd say give authorization to medic as well, or a selectable, trustworthy squadmate.