New Ubisoft Logo

File: MqUdDiv.jpg (7KB, 301x167px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 301x167px

>>378745919

Hasn't the Ubisoft logo always looked like this tho?

Someone earlier said it was a toilet being flushed, which is also a good comparison

This new logo just perfectly fits their brand.

>New game is announced
>Not immediately apparent that it's shit
>Still though... The details looks kind of messy
>Game gets released and you can take a closer look yourself
>You realise it's shit

File: 1496315788590.jpg (162KB, 1000x625px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1000x625px

Even reddit can make a better logo than they can.

>>378745919
haha poop is so funny. are you going to show the rest of your class your funny joke, sport?

File: die.jpg (54KB, 701x700px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 701x700px

>>378746459
>straight-up admits he's from reddit
Go back you filthy immigrant

*poops*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHHAHAHA JUST POOPIN LADS AM I RIGHT OR AM IR RIGHT HUH?

>>378745919
>3D model top view to front view transition
anyone?

>>378746353
>hurr le epic ubisoft is shit may may XD

When will this meme end? Fact is, Ubisoft makes big, well made and FUN games. I suppose the only criticism that could be levelled at them would be their recent political correctness, but, hey they're nowhere near as bad as EA or Activision with their "progressive" disrespect of real wars.

>old Ubisoft philosophy
>Prince of Persia games evolve

>new Ubisoft philosophy
>we shall delete a few actions and features with each sequel

Ayyyyyy

>>378746479
>>378746551
>>378746581
Oy vey the shills are out this morning

>>378746581
brilliant bait m8, have a (you)

IT'S NOT A POOP FUCKING DELETE THIS I WORKED HARD ON THIS LOGO

>>378746581
Fuck off retard, Ubisoft make the same shitty actionstealth game every time with a different coat of paint. At least EA's games feel different from each other.

>>378746842
>>378746747
You really have no idea how "shilling" works if you think that I'd be criticizing the company that's supposedly paying me for being too politically correct

>>378746747
*braaaAAAAAAaaaaahhp*

File: 11349286_1040024472704183_1067484277_n.jpg (38KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 480x480px

>mfw Prince of Persia and The Settlers series ruined by Ubisoft after old management got replaced by dumb "Social Media Integration and Social Justice" faggots who started completely castrating games and removing gameplay to appease the "wider audience" aka "casuals"

>mfw Massive Entertainment, one of the most talented RTT/RTS developers at the time who made Ground Control and World in Conflict, were banned from producing what they are good at after being eaten by Ubisoft and relegated to being a support team for games and genres that have no relation to what Massive Entertainment is good at

Is there no justice in this world?

>>378745919
I do not doubt that the designer of that logo was going for a 3D poop joke on how shit modern Ubisoft is

Their developers get treated worse than dirt. Thats why they have to pay independent shills just to advertise their games, even the developers dont want to do it.

>>378747007
Oh I just assumed you weren't a retard. If you actually like the rancid diarrhea that Ubisoft shits out then I feel bad for you.

They killed prince of persia for the ass creed wank series.That cannot be forgotten.

File: 1496253245009.gif (134KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 340x340px

>>378745919

File: grow home.jpg (138KB, 1500x844px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1500x844px

>>378746581
Ubisoft have literally only made one decent game in the last 5 years

File: 1494327328340.png (597B, 32x35px) Image search: [Google]

597B, 32x35px

>>378746265
LOL

>>378746581
this post is reddit as fuck

>>378746459

How exactly is that a better logo, what the fuck does that moon even represent

File: ubicuck.jpg (117KB, 1316x335px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1316x335px

>>378747438

File: I never asked for social integration.jpg (185KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1680x1050px

>>378747148
I think Heroes got hit by far the worst. Only reason Heroes 5 was good was because Nival developed it. Both subsequent games did worse and worse, with Heroes 7 presumably killing the franchise for good and Ubisoft ending the contract with Limbic Entertainment.

>>378747324
Not the guy you're assaulting, but I found Watch Dogs 2 to be surprisingly fun. It was a pretty huge improvement on the first game. Not quite an AC2 tier sequel, but in that direction.

>>378747495
Samus Aran
Master Chief
Soap from CoD
Minecraft Protag
Kirby

there's 5 super popular ones. What you assumed they were straight? Ignorant much?

File: pcgamer.com.jpg (175KB, 959x779px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 959x779px

>>378747491
>>378746459
Obviously some Muslim thing.

So it's 100% fitting.

>>378747403
underrated af, decent sequel too

>>378747438
>xiii
aw shiet I had forgot about that game

File: vh.jpg (147KB, 560x698px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 560x698px

>>378747403
They have their indie departments, but those games are not UBISOFT games if you know what I mean.

This was literally on the front page of Reddit all day yesterday and yes I know how horrible I went to reddit

File: 1495634138608.jpg (141KB, 859x1024px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 859x1024px

>>378745919
What the fuck are they thinking? It looks like they made it in Adobe Illustrator and just accidentally made it so the ends of the stroke didn't align properly.

File: all games should be the same.jpg (88KB, 950x634px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 950x634px

>>378747671
mega publishers always feel the need to posture to, in their mind, gather some good PR. as if some throwaway statement about inclusion and such affects one bit the ruination of franchises and killing studios.

>>378747592
The fuck is this?

File: johnkerryholdingastackofps3games.jpg (13KB, 290x256px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 290x256px

>>378746581
>When will this meme end?
When they stop making shit games
>I suppose the only criticism that could be levelled at them would be their recent political correctness,
Oh boy I smell some delicious pasta cooking.

>>378747438
>XIII is dead
Nu-prince was pretty good, aside from having next to no combat.

>>378747671
>Fez Studio Polytron
They still exist?

>>378747886
Writer's self insert which he also voices. Only appears in episodes he writes and nowhere else.

>>378747438
pop 2008 is better than two thrones though

File: 1496130860167.png (603KB, 728x5820px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 728x5820px

>>378747886
Self insert in a cartoon

>>378747978
>Nu-prince was pretty good, aside from having next to no combat.
The combat in the PoP trilogy games was pretty aggressively mediocre, anyway. It's hard to miss.

>>378747491
i thought the "moon" is there to add depth to the o you paranoid retard

>>378748234
Why the fuck would you ever advertise this kind of shit openly. I wish fetishes were still something to be ashamed of and each one didn't have stupid fucking 'acceptance movements' for them

File: the great aku is worried by that.jpg (291KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 1920x1080px

>>378748234
>that fox

File: b8.jpg (698KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 1280x720px

>>378747978
I actually rather liked the standalone Prince of Persia game, but it came at a bad time and was too different from the trilogy. We'll also conveniently ignore how Sands of Time trilogy was different from older games.

File: 1495988809505.png (123KB, 950x534px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 950x534px

>>378746581

>>378746581
>$0.05 has been deposited to your account

>>378748589
just a reminder ubisoft never released the epilogue dlc on pc, effectively robbing pc players of the true ending

File: 1496293377686.jpg (57KB, 317x750px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 317x750px

Me on the left

>>378747671
>Zynga
Fuck those clowns for killing OMGPOP

>>378748363

It is not advertised openly, it is a webcomic about fetishes and kinks. There is no acceptance movement (have you ever met someone trying to raise puppyplay awareness in the streets ?), just consenting adults doing what they want behind closed doors.

There is no reason to be ashamed of what you like as long as you don't push it on other. It's healthy to be comfortable with yourself. You're on a website dedicated to a wide range of sexual perversion (hentai/traps...)

If you can take the advise of a stranger, ask yourself why a tumblr-tier comic about fetishes provoke such a strong emotional reaction to you. This is not normal nor healthy.

File: PicsArt_05-31-11.46.53.jpg (67KB, 720x724px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 720x724px

It's shit, someone please make a better one of mine.

>>378748950
t. degenerate

>>378748787
Well we'll be able to emulate it soon enough.

>>378748234
This comic both presented the idea of a public fetish meetup to me and also made it instantly unappealing. Very impressive how this comic writer consistently picks awful guest artists.

>>378747710
I'm all for indie divisions that can make games like Valiant Hearts and Rayman games, but contrasting that with what is clearly very corporate structure of the rest of Ubisoft just emphasizes how they're doing the former to get some good boy points with games. They don't really care and just chase the latest big budget rehash like every other global publisher.

File: N4AAF00Z.jpg (31KB, 338x450px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 338x450px

>>378748174
>push-X-to-win interactive movie is better than a proper video game with proper gameplay
2/10 because you made me reply.

>>378748950
>This is not normal nor healthy.
That's all that mattered in that post.

>>378749056

You're on /v/ man. We're all degenerate here, and if you unironically think that you're an exception, reevaluate your life.

>>378749190
>two thrones
>proper gameplay
Yeah, that's cute.

>>378749348
It added more action mechanics and movement mechanics upon Warrior Within, so yeah it was still proper gameplay. It was still a video GAME, rather than an interactive movie that PoP 2008 is.

>>378748234
This is by the same cuck that made that literal cuck fetish comic, isn't it?

>>378749448
>interactive movie
The only major problem was the lack of consequence in death and how combat was handled, stop using terms you don't understand you fucking retard.

>>378748234
Welp that's one more reason to gas furfags.

>>378749448
>more movement mechanics
Oh, good! More signposts I can press buttons at to move forward between boring combat/stealth sections and some of the world's most inane puzzles. It's like I'm playing Sands of Time but worse!

It's not like PoP 2008 is much more than that, either, but the parkour at least feels good. Shit, even the the knockoff Wii version of The Forgotten Sands has better parkour, lmao

File: Screenshot 2017-06-01 10.09.38.png (373KB, 601x848px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 601x848px

>>378748647

File: 1315557227534.gif (2MB, 380x214px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 380x214px

>>378749662
I am using the exact proper terms that make you butthurt.

PoP 2008 was an Interactive Movie where the development philosophy was on creating a "cinematic experience" and "artistic presentation", with simplistic gameplay and press-x-to-win added just so it doesn't lose the video game denomination.
It's a visual novel with some simple gameplay mechanics.

PoP trilogy was a focus on gameplay development, where gameplay mechanics and action was primarily developed with each sequel, and graphics/cinematic experience had a secondary role.

One is an interactive movie made to look good.
The other is a series of actual video games,
with the emphasis on games as in gameplay.

You can go cry in a corner now /tv/.

>>378749691
That sounds okay
Id do it

>>378746093
fpbp

>>378750039
PoP 2008 is at the very least a platformer because of how shit and meaningless the combat is, which in turn prevents it from being a "interactive movie" like you desperately want everyone to believe. You're wrong, get over it.

File: __fujiwara_no_mokou_touhou_drawn_by_shangguan_feiying__38a93fd9ee8cf2eeff3ba8578495c12d.jpg (29KB, 334x443px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 334x443px

>all the PoP fans finally reveal themselves
Where were you all this time, friends?

>>378750008
Jesus, Dobson...

>>378750039
>PoP trilogy was a focus on gameplay development, where gameplay mechanics and action was primarily developed with each sequel, and graphics/cinematic experience had a secondary role.
And it had one game that was paced well and was pretty alright but had fights that were insanely repetitive, one game that was mostly garbage and had vaguely better combat, and one final, pretty bland game that mercifully let you avoid all combat but otherwise had no features that defined it from the other two. Unless you REALLY liked Sands of Time, there's no value you can extract from playing the other two games. The Forgotten Sands is a better game than either of those two sequels and The Forgotten Sands' Wii version is the best game in the series.

>>378750039
>>378750527
>avoid all combat
most combat, correcting myself before you try to, I'm aware there are forced encounters in Two Thrones

File: 1315582868706.jpg (14KB, 229x255px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 229x255px

>>378750221
All Prince of Persia games are platformers.
Except the one game you are defending is closer to a movie because is stripped away gameplay in favor of cinematic experience and graphics,
while the original series is closer to being a proper game because it has more focus on gameplay.

This is why the latest generation of consoles is so shit. You consolefans have lost sight of what the definition of "game" in "video game" is, and now your games are increasingly more like movies and less like games.

Your standards have gone down rather than up,
and now graphics/cinematic experience are the only values you have to grasp upon because console controllers on your favorite platform have stopped evolving, while other platforms who dare do it or the PC keep upping the standards of video games and evolving them.

It's sad, and also the core reason publishers like EA and Ubisoft are shit.

Now that i remember, EA closed Bullfrog because their games were "too innovative" and "not enough like movies" for their time.
I guess you are an EA fan as well.

File: 1496242413285.jpg (29KB, 238x241px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 238x241px

>>378745919
>*breathes in*

You're as bad as that shitty logo.

File: self consciousness.png (326KB, 921x654px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 921x654px

>>378750296
He actually did it the absolute madman

>>378747007
I know exactly how shilling works.
You adjust advertisement for target audience.
Japanese hate niggers and strong shemales, so star wars VII were focused on Robots instead or the nig and Rey.
4chan is an "internet hate machine" but itr has a huge audience you can tap into.
Bigot's dollar isn't worth less than a progressive's.
On 4chan instead of shilling for, you shill against.
Like in Back to the future the bench a hobo was sleeping on has the brand of a raisin or nuts company paid for by competition

>>378750696
>This is why the latest generation of consoles is so shit.
That's funny, because the trilogy would feel right at home on a modern system, with several half-baked gameplay styles mashed into an incohesive whole.

File: son_of_dob.jpg (306KB, 1198x313px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1198x313px

>>378750635

File: 1315683174431.png (46KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 300x300px

>>378750879
The trilogy would feel right because you would just copy paste the trilogy and improve its graphics.
The gameplay wouldn't advance, either because graphics would be the focus or because you are just copy pasting it for the sake of nostalgia bucks.

In the end, nothing improves except graphics,
which is a sad state for what is supposed to be a video game, with emphasis on game.

And that's precisely the problem that has gradually arisen in the 2nd half of the PS3's gen.
Games have stopped evolving their "game" part,
and only focus on the "video" part.

The PCfags at least have a keyboard which has unlimited development potential for gameplay and gameplay mechanics, which is being squeezed by various developers constantly.

The console gaming library though is looking more and more like copy pasta with nothing improved except graphics with each passing second, with rare and few exceptions when devs actually care and dare to push limits.

File: 1486416853227.jpg (32KB, 461x581px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 461x581px

>>378751206
>devs actually care and dare to push limits.
name 3.14 games that do this

>>378751206
Hahahaha, I cannot believe you seriously think that the PoP trilogy has anything more than insanely shallow action-adventure gameplay. You should try some modern console games, I bet you'd love them!

>>378748842
What a white knight faggot

>>378745919
Can someone do a 3D animation of the giant shitheap being viewed from the side and then it pans up to get an overview of the shit so it looks like the ubisoft logo. Has to be cell shaded of course.

>>378745919
I agree the new logo is shit, but the *breathes in* and laughing pasta is the most obnoxious thing /v/ does

>>378751485
go on reddit, it's their top story right now.

>>378748787
the dlc sucked ass and destroyed the ending

File: rice_pudding_vanilla_cinnamon.jpg (392KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1024x768px

>>378751303
That Jap game with dragons and shit in medieval times, European setting. Can't remember the name. RPG sandbox.
That shit actually introduced interesting gameplay mechanics and shit.

Kingdom Under Fire also had some great ideas for a console game with neat features. They fucked it up though.

There's also that game with giant spaceship battles where you control a ship like a mecha.

All in all, there are some games that push, but most genres are stuck in limbo because the console controllers are limiting them.

>>378751437
If PoP trilogy is shallow gameplay, then PoP 2008 can not even be called gameplay comparatively.

If i took a Twisted Metal game and removed all the weapons and shooting, but improved the graphics, i'd get PoP 2008.

File: ohohohohoho.jpg (415KB, 1077x1101px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 1077x1101px

>>378745919

>>378745919
>metroshit
Gah.

Ubisoft is worse than Activision these days, the frogs have taken the ACBrotherhood open world formula and metastasized it into existing IPs and new IPs that feel like they're new in name only, put it in a FPS, there we go, we have Far Cry 3. Now let's put it in a game similar to GTA, voila we have this totally new IP™ called Watch Dogs, and this goes on.

As much as you want to give Activision shit, it's not like they took CoD and thought "hmmm, what's a IP we have people like, let's add some multiplayer with killstreaks to it"

Whenever I hear Ubisoft open wo- I know it's a definitive pass.

>>378751383
Fuck you!

>>378750008
Dobson is ISIS now?

>>378750696
The trilogy was a halfassed action adventure platformer, and PoP 2008 was just a platformer because they realised they couldn't get the combat to work the way they did. Aside from you heavily projecting values I've never stated once in any of my posts, your entire argument is "there's no combat, so it's an interactive movie" which is one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever heard. Educate yourself or drink bleach, you stupid faggot.

>>378751724
No, it's equally shallow. The only reason you think the old trilogy is somehow better is because you've got your rose-tinted goggles on tight and think that anything with a vaguely modern sheen is inherently worse.

File: Somalia_East_Africa_Famine_0ab5d.jpg (92KB, 606x642px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 606x642px

>>378752124
>and PoP 2008 was just a platformer because they realised they couldn't get the combat to work the way they did.
Incorrect.
PoP 2008 was just a platformer because the original developers (individuals) were replaced with new ones.
New ones did their own thing because they can't continue the work of past staff who maybe actually had an idea out of experience on how to finally create good combat before they were replaced.
You can consult the credits comparisons.
Even the movie community has learned to memorize names of individuals rather than being decieved by brand names.
This is the EA disease i am talking about.

If you changed a book writer in a book series that people only read because of the original writer's ideas and potential for improvement,
you will end up with a pile of shit nobody wanted which is only using the name of the predecessor to cash in on it.

Frankly, i'd be fine with PoP 2008 if it was its own game and wasn't named PoP.

Someone unironically likes PoP 2008, I mean I haven't even played it but I've gotta be a bit skeptical here. Are you trolling?

>>378752493
Sorry I don't give enough of a fuck about a subpar series from 10 years ago, but you still haven't made any argument beyond "there's no combat, so it's a movie"

File: 1159383453517.jpg (15KB, 270x226px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 270x226px

>>378752280
>the only reason you think the old trilogy is somehow better is because
It has more gameplay mechanics, in other words more gameplay, which is a quantifiable fact.
Listing the gameplay mechanics and features between both games easily paints a picture of which game has more gameplay.

Graphics is secondary in video games.
If it was not, then they wouldn't be called video games, they would be called video or just plain and simple movies or visual novels.

I don't have a problem with games with good graphics unless they sacrifice gameplay for the sake of graphics and visuals.

>>378752493
>maybe actually had an idea out of experience on how to finally create good combat
Why on earth would you think that? They had three games to attempt it and still couldn't make anything good.

>>378752493
not him but if you wanna be picky with developer teams, the people who made Sands of Time didn't really work on Warrior Within, one of the lead guys of SoT was Patrice Desilets, he was taked with making a next gen Prince of Persia for the upcoming PS3/360, and after wanting to do something more violent and fighting to spin it into a new IP, it ultimately became Assassin's Creed 1.

Warrior Within was made with the AssCreed Brotherhood mentality, 1 year after the last game made by different devs.

>>378752795
Christ almighty you are fucking stupid. PoP 2008 has more gameplay mechanics that Super Mario Bros., are we gonna move onto saying that SMB is also a movie?

>>378752804
You didn't like the PoP trilogy? I'm guessing you just don't like good platformers?

Of all the things you complain about, you complain about the combat because it's 'repetitive'? Really? Do you complain about mining resources in RTS because that's repetitive too?

>>378752795
Gameplay doesn't mean shit if it isn't implemented well. Are you really trying to argue that quantity is better than quality?

File: 1159194275440.jpg (40KB, 301x360px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 301x360px

>>378752804
They had 3 games to attempt it and they added new features with each one.
The only thing they needed was balancing.
I refuse to believe that they couldn't finally balance it all out in a 4th title, because that's just wishing for a developer with potential to fail which is as bad as glorifying a developer for being sub-par.

You settle for the sub-par.
I wish for improvement and evolution.

What we have here is a conflict of philosophy between us that we will never agree upon.

>>378751383
Fuck, you got me.

>>378752719
I'm not really so much making a case for PoP 2008 being good as I'm saying that Two Thrones is bad and the iterations that came after it were an improvement.

File: 1163161729406.jpg (39KB, 450x338px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 450x338px

>>378752937
>PoP 2008 has more gameplay mechanics that Super Mario Bros
And less gameplay mechanics than WW and TT.
We are discussing Prince of Persia, not SMB here.
Stick to the topic.

Also something happened with the original owner of the Prince of Persia, Jordan Mechner, and Ubisoft that made them decide to just stop making PoP and do AssCreeds indefinitely.

Dont remember what.

>>378746581
Ubisoft has made "0" good games in the last ten years.

File: 1344840021480.jpg (548KB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 5000x5000px

>>378752719
>someone unironically likes a game I haven't played and have no experience with, can you believe it?

File: 1158854173297.png (5KB, 156x227px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 156x227px

>>378753010
>a fighting game where all characters have only 2 combos as gameplay is better than a fighting game where all characters have over 10 combos, because the 2 combos are perfectly implemented!

No.

>>378753092
There's still Forgotten Sands

>>378753129
>Being this daft
Should I even bother anymore?

>>378753287
Which was also better than Two Thrones, yes. Depends on which version you play, of course, but as long as you don't play a handheld one you're good to go.

>>378753239
No, I can't really, because from what I've read so far I think you're a retard, and from this reply? I know you are.

>>378748842
lol'd

>>378753206
no, it was Patrice Desilets (lead developer of Sands of Time) who wanted to spin his Prince of Persia PS3/360 project into AssCreed because he was researching the syrian assassins and he wanted to make a game more violent than what Prince of Persia was about, which was a fairly lighthearted series. Ubisoft was against making it into a new IP, but Desilets won his bosses' approval in the end. Given how the thing exploded you can say he was right on the money

>>378746351
no.

the spiral was more uniform, now it looks like a piece of shit.

>>378753301
When you strip a game from its gameplay features then it is more like a movie and less like a game.
Prince of Persia 2008 was a stripped down PoP game where only the graphics and art direction improved.

SMB was SMB for its time, it has nothing to do in this discussion of development philosophy.

>>378753393
I like all of them. I have no complaints.
Maybe the only one I have isn't even legitimate.
I didn't like how hard it was to get the true ending to WW, some of the requirements to get the important sword were very missable.

>>378753560
Fair enough. Have you tried the Wii version of TFS? It's surprisingly worth playing, completely different game from the HD version.

>>378753403
I'm not the one implying a game I never touched is objective shit, you troglodyte. Go play the fucking games you love to talk shit about so much instead of posting about how they "look like shit" on 4chan.

>>378753301
If the SMB devs had the means to add more gameplay to SMB at the time considering the controller and considering what games existed before SMB that were similar to it, they would have.

The PoP 2008 devs had all the means to add gameplay based on the standard set up by the past games, but they didn't.
Don't even try to compare the two you daft cunt.

>>378747403
>pic completely unrelated

>>378753745
>If the SMB devs had the means to add more gameplay to SMB at the time considering the controller and considering what games existed before SMB that were similar to it, they would have.
Only if they could implement them well.

>>378753018
>You settle for the sub-par.
I'm not the one defending an insanely mediocre series of action games.

>I wish for improvement and evolution.
Bull-fucking-shit you do. The changes between PoP games in the trilogy were more granular than changes between fucking New Super Mario Bros. games. There's barely any added depth to combat and none for platforming. The combat added some new moves and a weapon system but no enemy behaviors that encourage you to do anything beyond what you're already doing. The platforming feels exactly the same between each game with the ONLY difference being that you can grab onto a slightly larger variety of things, which ultimately has no impact on the gameplay because it's all insanely linear, so you're not even trying to find a goddamn path except for every great once in a while in WW and those sections are blatant fucking padding.

The only real improvements made from game to game were that combat felt a bit better in WW, and combat became avoidable in TT, but these core changes weren't enough to cover up the fact that both games have worse level design and some of the most zero-effort puzzles I've ever seen in a video game, ultimately making both of them worse than the first.

>>378753875
>if you can't implement it well you shouldn't do it
99% of inventions and creations in society and history came as a result of unstable experimentation.
If we followed your philosophy, there would be no innovation or advancement left in the world.

PoP 2008 failed to perfect and "implement well" what was set as a standard before them, opting only for a small component of the game because making a game simple is a good way to give off a mirage that it is "implemented well".
Your mindset is all wrong.
If you like simple games, then by all means you have the whole mobile gaming industry with simple "well implemented" games. That should be the standard that consoles and PC gaming should strive towards as well, no?

>>378753687
Dont have a Wii, but is this something like how Splinter Cell Double Agent on the xbox 360 was infinitely better than the PC version?

>>378754139
Yeah, let's make a game with shit combat a FOURTH time, that's a good idea!

File: 622.jpg (55KB, 991x902px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 991x902px

>>378745919

>>378746581
Ubisoft is honestly worse than EA is nowadays, and has been for a few years now.

>>378746581
>well made and FUN
Pffft

Let's pretend they're fun for a second.

When's the last time Ubisoft released a game and it wasn't an absolute fucking train wreck technically?

>>378754139
No I mean Nintendo specifically. Those guys are fucking nuts when it comes to making sure a game plays well.

>>378754270
>let's not even attempt to make an improved game at all while learning from past mistakes, and make a simplistic game instead
In other words, death of innovation and advancement.
That's what you are saying here.

>>378754362
1st party game, specifically

>>378749787

This is completely unrelated to furries.

File: purge.jpg (161KB, 1000x514px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1000x514px

>>378748234

File: Potter_working%2C_Bangalore_India.jpg (3MB, 2271x1932px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2271x1932px

>>378745919
>>378745919

>>378754376
Many, many games have dropped bad systems entirely. Sometimes we have to let things go in order to move forward instead of pointlessly carrying around old baggage.

Speaking of ubi soft
whatever happened to that Michel Ancel with the giantess and mr bones

>>378754239
Possibly, I'm not sure just how different those two games are.

If you have a decent computer and controller and are willing to be sort of clever about binding your controls, you can play TFS Wii on Dolphin without waggle.

>>378754695
Well i dont have an xbox 360 either but i heard those two games were made by different teams and one of them stood out as better

>>378754316
I just dont know. Which is worse. Having done nothing right for so long that everything is fucking mess. Or having great IPs and fucking every single one of them with horrible sequels?

>>378745919
PVVVVWT

>>378745919
so now they admit that they are ubishit

>>378748234
Man , they really had nothing to go on with this one

>ask consent
>be a dog
>......there are different materials to make masks out of?

That's the thing with most fetishes, there ain't much to it unless you want to go into why people like certain weird things. Just comes off as people trying to justify themselves

>>378746581
Damage control has arrived.

>>378754623
>Many, many games have dropped bad systems entirely.
If Humanity dropped every idea, system, and invention because the first prototypes were bad, we wouldn't be here talking on the Internet and would instead be bashing stones in front of a cave you muppet.
Don't go all philosophical with a fedora to justify laziness and lack of skills.
PoP 2008 would have been much more than it was if Ubisoft management didn't fuck up the devs EA style.

>>378754941
Like Blizzard huh

>>378751584
I don't frequent reddit. How do i find it?

>>378746581
But their games are shit, even if they can be fun, anon.
I have a few hundred hours clocked in Rainbow Six: Siege, but it's still a horrible mess that they finally promised to fix after two years. It probably still will be horrible afterwards because they've proven over those two year timespan they can't even fix the most basic of bugs.

Other than that, every other game they make is just a reskin of a previous game in the same franchise. Some can be fun to play, but they're definitely far from good.
Also, Ubisoft is absolute king at generating hype for their games during E3, only to ship out a really mediocre product at best compared to what they showed. Just look at some E3 footage of Siege and compare it to the actual game, for starters.

>>378754915
Ah, then yeah, that would be an apt enough comparison. That said, when I say TFS Wii is a different game, I mean entirely different. It has the same name and all, but everything about it that could possibly be different is. New gameplay mechanics, totally different story, entirely different setting.

>>378747747
>suicide
>goes to heaven
Eh.

>suicide by pressing the gun against your head
Well, that is just retarded. You put the gun at your palate or below your chin. Otherwise you risk to survive as a vegetable, because you only blew out some relatively minor parts of your brain rather than the brainstem.

File: Ubisoft.jpg (93KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 600x600px

So which IP that you care for has been shat upon by Ubisoft?

Might & Magic here.

>>378755328
Yea I have to say, as fun as Siege is, they really just got lucky with design, and holy crap, you absolutely cannot call that game competitive when there are so many factors that just don't correlate to player skill

>>378747671
Didn't he let you down on that, too? When do you start winning, my boy?

>>378755491
Everything. I liked everything Tom Clancy, PoP
Now they're all dead.

Why do small companies sell themselves to EA and Ubisoft if they know their future to be?

>>378755491
The Anno series.

>>378755620
Money.

File: 1495658563715.jpg (39KB, 419x281px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 419x281px

>>378745919
Looks pretty good desu

>>378746581
YAASSSSSS SLAAAAYY

>>378754316
Take that back, FIFA is not better than Ubisoft

>>378747671
>ea, ubisoft, bethseda and zynga
only thing missing would be gearbox and thats the cancer in the industry right there

Was Might & Magic Heroes VII really shit?
Limbic developed it as well.
I know VI was shit because another developer.

>>378745919
I saw this on reddit yesterday :)

>>378755115
>HUMANITY WOULD NEVER HAVE GOTTEN THIS FAR IF
>implying I'm the one going fucking philosophical
They made their fucking mistakes, they made a game with shit combat three fucking times in a row and the third game's biggest improvement was giving the player the option to remove standard combat from the equation. Thinking that a developer should waste time and money working on a system that they're clearly not very good at is insanely boneheaded. The only reason combat exists in the low-budget sweatshop sequels that were WW and TT is because they already made combat in SoT, so they made some small improvements and it was cheap and everyone was happy. Not as easy when you're building a new game from the ground up.

The other galling part of your argument is the implication that the PoP games would have somehow had to "invent" good combat when the stunning reality is that many games before and after have had much better combat. Prince of Persia never even came close to pushing the envelope and they didn't really make much of an effort to address what the actual problems were from one game to the next (again, TT's best new feature was avoiding combat).

>>378746581
wtf I <3 Ubisoft now

8/10

File: Ubisoft.png (12KB, 456x186px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 456x186px

>>378745919
They should go back to their old logo

>>378746581
There's more difference between The Sims 4 and the past Sims games, than there is between Ubisoft games. Let that sink in you dumb fuck.

>>378747438
I don't get why Far Cry 5 is on there, we don't know if the game is shit yet and when the resistance against Eden's Hope is the actual church.

>>378756716
>WW and TT
>small improvements upon SoT combat
Factually incorrect. Major improvements.
There was actual difficulty to fighting enemies for a change compared to SoT and you had more play-styles to choose from including even stealth.
It was clearly improvement rather than stagnation compared to what you are stating.
For all you know, the platforming of PoP 2008 was continued improvement plans of the original devs before they were replaced, with only combat requiring fixing as the final puzzle and then followed up with adding more AI development and more enemy diversity/numbers in the followup combined with the improved platforming for effects.

File: no-c.png (8KB, 639x411px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 639x411px

>>378747419
kek!

File: 8ad.jpg (421KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 720x576px

>>378747648
I'll have you know Kirby is one the straightest video game characters around you fuckin' queer.

File: 1495934543066.png (10KB, 507x401px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 507x401px

>>378746581

>>378745919
MEME MAGIC

File: 1441062052034.gif (460KB, 255x192px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 255x192px

>>378756841
>the rainbow makes all the polfags shit themselfs in anger

>SJW DONT EVEN BUY GAMES WFT KEKSOFT

>>378746581
t.Ubi marketing representative

>>378747747
I thought this was a video game thread

>>378757462
>There was actual difficulty to fighting enemies for a change compared to SoT
Not a fucking chance. Enemy encounters are vaguely harder but don't really require any additional thought. You grab a weapon from the ground, maybe pick a ranged target to take down first, and then you jump at walls or otherwise mash buttons until the guys die. There is a single hard fight in the game, and it's only difficult because the two boss characters are insanely aggressively, have insanely long reach, attack while off-screen, can spin around 180 degree mid-animation, and are completely invincible when not stunned.

The rest of your bullshit is speculation, and I'm pretty thoroughly bored arguing with a brick wall about mediocre video games at this point.

>>378747889
I miss the days of ps3 maymays when it was about the banter instead of muh poltards. :(

>>378757905
That's actually a good point.
SJW's don't even buy any games for the most part.
They are only interested in their ideology and "cause" being propagated by others because they lack the skills themselves, but other than that they don't waste time and money on entertainment because it's all already being spent on furthering social justice.
In actuality, the business PR of pandering to SJW's makes a net loss as you stand to lose more customers who are in it to play games than you stand to gain customers who are not interested in games as much as politics.
I think i'll have to research the above thoroughly by comparing financial records, introduction of politics into games, and other concurrent cycles. This is a good business management thesis.
I hope i won't be the only one doing this though.

>>378746093
underrated post

Dark Souls 2 is better than Demon's, 1, 3, and Bloodborne. And it will be better than anything FROM shits out at E3, too.

>>378753274
Look at Tekken, every character has 80+ moves(including different endings to strings I'll admit) and over half of them are unusable
If you look at high level gameplay you'll always see the same combos because those combos are optimal, why would you ever do a suboptimal combo?
The exception to the rule is KI, where the combos are an inherent mindgame.

File: ubisoft mad because elections.jpg (724KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

724KB, 1920x1080px

>>378746581
Literally all their games have shit framerate on my PC, especially Watch Dogs 1 back then and I can easily play Witcher 3 at constant 60 FPS.

There is no excuse for their shit games to run this horribly.

Most their games have a procedurally generated, empty open world, casual as fuck shooter gameplay designed for a controller and broken mouse controls, horrible AI, loot and crafting. Glitches everywhere.

Also liberal propaganda.

>>378747438
As shitty as Watchdogs is to be fair you're meant to hate the fat hacker dyke with a phone embedded in her arm.

File: shit.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>378745919

File: 705.gif (538KB, 240x176px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 240x176px

>>378759683

>>378759683
i want a 3d printer

>>378759683
Fuck i wish it was just 3D animation and not 3D printed. Because you can't see the lines that make up the actual logo that well.

It needs to be cell shaded 3d.

>>378747648
nintendo lawyers will skin you alive for defamation, have fun nigger

>>378759227
sounds like you have shit hardware
poorfags like you and consolefags always holding back gaming

>>378759683
Am I the only one who thinks that looks fucking nothing like the original image?

just checking

>Aisha Tyler not hosting the Ubisoft e3 conference

Literally what is the fucking point lads?

File: A_038.jpg (63KB, 757x430px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 757x430px

>>378759683

You can't say Ubisoft isn't true to itself.

>>378755539
not exactly, liberal 7th circuit """judges""" unconstitutionally struck it down. their day of defeat will come very soon

>>378747438
You have to give them credit that they at least made the tranny governor in WD2 look like a man.
Everything in that game that involved any of the characters was so horrible tho, I would have been mad if it hadn't been free

>>378747648
>Kirby
leave right now you fucking degenerate

File: 1496179084958.jpg (11KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 240x240px

>>378745919
alright, i'll give you this one anon.