why do people care so much about their games being 60fps?

>>378737817
It looks crisper. Did you have to make a thread for this? Should you consider suicide?

Autists act autisticly about stuff they care about.

>>378737817
Why do you care about people caring about fps?

>>378737817
LOL HITLER SO RANDUMB xd

File: 1495784121111.jpg (43KB, 625x415px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 625x415px

Go ahead and dump that shitty comic.

>>378737817

its pretty fucking great

Because 30fps is litterally unplayable, litterally UNPLAYABLE, LITTERALLY.

>>378737817
Why do people care so much about their games being 1080p or 4k?

>>378737817
when you constantly play on 60 then 30 and below start to look horribly choppy

>>378738397
this acoustic level I haven't reached and don't really even understand what they mean

Sometimes a game needs high fps due to fast paced gameplay. Other than that, it is just validation and justification of buying overpriced hardware for the most juvenile hobby in existence. The diminishing returns are crazy this day and age

60 is still unplayable. 100 fps minimum

>>378737961
Why do you answer a question with another question?

>>378737817
Because I have a good sight, I can see the difference between 30 and 60 fps.

It's not your fault if you can't.

60 FPS is sluggish shit, completely unplayable, 144 FPS is standard, 240 preferred.

When you're constantly denied quality titles on a daily basis and have to make due with several years old ports, you'll have to use any excuse to make your platform of choice not look as ridiculous as it really is. Hence why all the mustards creamed themselves at the fact they got Bayonetta 7 years after consoles, and it's better because it's 'a stable 60FPS'.

I'd rather have games than meaningless performance in western trash and decades old ports.

File: fps_1.webm (112KB, 460x358px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 460x358px

>>378737817

>>378737817
ITT faggots who play with shit consoles and don't know what 60fps even looks like

>>378737817
Because it looks and plays better. It's important in every game, even dark souls (particularly easy to notice the difference because dsfix allows for on the fly fps switching) but the biggest difference is made in arena shooters like unreal tournament. It's simply easier to play at 60fps than 30

Sage

Because Totalbiscuit cares about it to the point of refusing to play Bloodborne and watching a playthrough on Youtube instead, he has a zero tolerance policy for no 60fps. Because retards can't think for themselves, they can't realize that 30fps or even a bit below that, while not optimal, is perfectly acceptable for certain genres of games, and just parrot what he says.

>>378738710
Why don't you eat my asshole?

>>378739884
Why do you go on the internet and lie? What is the purpose behind this?

>>378740206
How am I lying?

60fps is essential for certain genres, like FPS, fighting, and SHMUP games. For an action adventure game that isn't fast paced, e.g., I don't know, Ocarina of Time, the framerate it has is okay but could definitely be better. The game isn't even close to unplayable.

60 fps is the current standard because tv refresh rates are 60hz which means it's perfect sync with your average display output. Since PC's can go higher and monitors have higher hz as well we have tech like AMD freesync and Nvidia GSync to help lineup higher fps with higher display refresh rates (hz) to avoid screen tearing and flickers. Going back to 60 fps the reason gamers want a consistent 60 fps is so that the game is in near perfecy sync with the display and causes no tearing or flickers. Hope this helps.

>>378740274
>Because Totalbiscuit cares about it to the point of refusing to play Bloodborne and watching a playthrough on Youtube instead
This is false. Why did you have to concoct a bullshit story to support a point which holds by itself? I agree with you, but if you pad out your argument with bollocks, it just makes you look like a twat.

>>378740308
>>378740308
>>378740308

Industry standard for TV's is still 30fps

That's just above what cable uses still and they have zero incentive to upgrade, short of literally dying right now.

Industry standard for desktop monitors is probably 60, but TV's are still garbage

I mean my TV's proper refresh rate is like 22fps, and it's still watchable. You just can't game on it worth a damn. I have a projector that projects at 12fps, and that's pretty close to useless, but it fits in my pocket so I won't complain.

>>378739884
2bh if I ran dual Titan x then I would be triggered by trash frames as well

Get used to 60. Then try going back to 30. Now you know why.

>>378739121
15 fps looks smoother desu

>>378737817
>hurr durr why do people care about nice food when you can eat shit and survive

File: diminishing graphical returns.jpg (73KB, 625x313px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 625x313px

>>378737817
>why do people care so much about their games being 60fps?
meme drones

>>378739884
Bloodborne would be a better game if it ran properly, and you know that you autistic fucks are going to be jumping out of your skin like the rest of us when they release the GOTY™ edition on PS5 and it gets consistent 60

Not that 30 isn't playable, but for a quick example, try going from Dark Souls 1 on PC to DS2 or 3. The 60 fps makes a world of difference.

>>378740036

give me place an time faggot, your asshole will beg for mercy

>>378737817

(You)

>>378741218
>adds more triangles without increasing detail of model
dumbass

>>378741218
>we should stop caring about improving things once we've reached an arbitraty point of diminishing return
lol

File: Giggle-Giggles-Giggling.gif (1MB, 245x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x200px

>>378737817
they are obsessive like this it is because of an autism Tbh

>>378738790
>tfw I never got the chance to play above 60fps

I really want to but I would need to upgrade my PC since I still can't run a lot of games at 60 fps without frame rate dips

>>378742245
Remember what it was like to use a CRT and play an infini-FPS with Quake or something.

It depends on genre:
For FPS and fast-paced games, 60 is needed for a good experience.
For adventure and survival horror games, 30 is enough
For RTS and strategy games, just 20 is enough

>>378742360
>frame rate is the same as refresh rate

>>378742245
60fps - 120+fps isn't as noticable a gain as 30 - 60 but you can tell and its real nice for face paced games like shooters or racing games

>>378742501
>RTS just 20 is enough
>RTS
>not fast-paced

It's necessary if you're playing with a mouse. Analog sticks and third person and not shooting it doesn't matter half as much

>>378742127
>Tbh
And your opinion just went into the trash.

>>378742360
when I had a CRT my PC was too shit to play anything but runescape and even then it froze all the time

File: saviour of Gensokyo.jpg (70KB, 700x800px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 700x800px

Because 60 fps is better than 30

>>378742583
I heard that even browsing on a desktop at 120hz feels nice. I'll find out myself sooner or larger

>>378738240
Literally you say? Prove it

>>378742802
it is, just dragging the mouse around its so noticeable, especially if have multiple displays and compare it to a 60hz panel

the main trade off really is that with the increased refresh rate colors are comparatively bad and things look more washed out but for gaming it doesn't matter that much