What's a videogame that /v/ heavily underrates?
>>378261708
Lotta shilling for a dead game.
I've put 35 hours into ME:A so far and I think it's pretty decent
My biggest complaint is the crafting/inventory seems really poorly designed, and meaningless at the same time
>>378261708
I concur. I'm quite liking Andromeda so far.
>>378263042
>>378262574
>>>/r/eddit
fuck off you faggots
Is the multiplayer active? Some anon gave me an Origin key for the game. I remember a lot of people praising the third one's multiplayer.
>>378262574
The game overall feels shallow. Is it atleast comfy?
I'm in the underground of the first planet (after the death of the father), considering selling back the game. Does it become better after ? I mean really better ?
>>378263316
I haven't played the other ME's so that's where I'm coming from. I basically see it as Far Cry in space, and from that angle it does its job. There are 4-5 planets that are no where near as big as your typical open world, but where most open worlds tend to be very samey, there's at least a lot of diversity in this case since the planets are wildly different
The combat is very solid, at least on PC. I can't imagine enjoying a shooter with a controller but that would apply for any game
The story is pretty engaging if you can ignore the lackluster animations. There's a lot going on and there's tons of little quests to flesh out various characters and what they care about
>>378263234
I get put into matches/lobbies almost instantly, if I join a random game. Sometimes it takes more time to find an APEX mission.
>>378261708
I feel like if you enjoyed Inquisition than Andromeda will probably be good for you.
But there's something about most of the side-quests that still just feels like drawn out busywork to me.
ME1 had some similar issues with the Mako quests, but there were still some narrative threads to mix things up.
Is the multiplayer PvP or co-op
>>378264512
Co-op. 4 player horde mode, with objectives.