Do you think they learned from their mistakes?

>>378221903
Considering even with those mistakes they made a boatload of money I highly doubt it. That and the people that haven't quit still feverishly play, there's no middle ground.

Not at all.

>learned from their mistakes
>looks like Destiny 1.5

nope

>>378221903
Of course not.

>>378221903
upgraded my pc just to play this :)

They made a second one didn't they

>>378221903
>Look at analytics from previous game
>look at areas where player interactions were maximized
>watch twitch and lets plays
>watch what is considered """awesome""" by both streamer and his audience
>incorporate the two when creating the sequel
>ignore story and give to a board of underpaid STEM fags to pump out some text to match with game design storyboard

At least PC version will have 60 fps.

p2p servers, so no they haven't

>>378222704
Apparently it's not completely P2P anymore, Some weird hybrid servers that are part P2P and part dedi

no; and ill still buy it

>>378222187
really? cause im quite sure a 970 is too much for a console port. no need to upgrade

>>378221903
The trailer made it obvious this was literally just Destiny 1.5, I'm going to say no, they haven't learned from their mistakes.

File: IMG_2024.jpg (30KB, 297x297px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 297x297px

>>378221903
If their mistake is making a game that sold excellently and still has tons of profit coming in thanks to micro transactions, then no, they haven't learned. Yeah, they're selling a game that's largely the same as the first, but why wouldn't they? If you ran a lemonade stand and knew you could make more money selling premade shit instead of something made with high quality ingredients that takes more time and effort, you'd be a fool not to do so.

Nope, as expected. Did people really think they would improve?

Game still has Trials of Lagswitch, so no.

>>378221903
nope