>post yfw you bought a switch
can't wait for Splatoon oh my god
>>378208682
>mfw I bought a pass
>post yfw you bought a Wii U
>>378208692
mfw
mfw lith is 2poor for passes
ARMS is turning out to be pretty good. Getting kind of smug.
Need more games yo
Playing my Vita in the meantime
>>378208682
I couldn't be anymore disinterested in anything that's on it right now.
>>378208682
You have good taste in anime girls.
I cant find one, and refuse to search for one.
Is blaster master good?
>>378208692
Can't wait to save Callie.
>>378209290
Blaster Master is okay but it's pretty easy and lasts about 7 hours. I haven't tried the free DLC characters.
Switch is a waste of money.
>>378209290
It's really damn great, yes. Fantastic music, good controls, varied gameplay, great bosses and actually challenging at times. The only bad thing about it is the parts where the fall damage kicks in, but it only happens literally 2 times in the entire game.
>>378209301
>>378209306
Thanks lads. Might buy it later today
The Arms things starts in 10 minutes
Seeya guys
>>378209316
Cool, see you guys then
>>378209316
It's time.
I didn't, and I probably wont until it gets a lot more games that "I" actually want, it drops motion controls from the normal controller so its price goes down, and they give up on the paid online idea. The last one because I guarantee you that if Microsoft charging for online access is a scam, with ALL THEIR TRAFFIC (which it is) Nintendo is even more of a scam because they don't even incur even a third of the traffic. Nintendo is literally Mario kart and Smash bros and that's it.
There is no justification for paid online for consoles, it's literally paying for a peer2peer redirect and credit card/account info storage. Even if you deflect and say 3rd parties too, I guarantee you that if they're using Nintendo's servers they're paying them for the space to run their game. Nintendo like all the other console manufacturers is making bank off your ignorance thinking its some special walled garden service that matters.
>>378208682
>>378208692
>>378208756
>>378209682
>Switch owners are obese anime watching losers
Makes sense
>>378209913
Try getting a job
>>378209987
Wasting money I have on a platform with anti consumer practices doesn't justify those practices existing you excuse making turd. Go marketer damage control somewhere else.
>>378208682
>Switch owners are passbabies
Makes sense, they're used to throwing away money
>>378210709
very, VERY underrated post
Imagine being so retarded you bought not just a console with no games, broken hardware and a fucked future, but also a 4chan pass.
>>378210312
Then don't waste your money. Nintendo is free to charge consumers what they want, people are free to choose to buy it, and are free to not do so. I think $20-25 a year is reasonable to cover any overhead running the online service requires, so I'll get it.
>>378210879
They sure were losing so much money giving us free online all these years, huh?
>>378211068
Very likely they incurred costs doing so, yeah. Even if it's all literally peer to peer, they still have servers for matchmaking and whatnot. Turning even a small loss into a profit will give them more incentive to make sure their service is actually good and encourage more online games.
>>378211275
Yes! Nintendo aren't doing this for personal greed. They're doing this to help us, the gamers.
>>378212000
It's a business, "personal" doesn't apply, and the point of a business IS to be greedy, aka turn a profit. Game costs have remained the same or lowered over time, while dev costs and inflation have risen. You have to open up new revenue streams to keep growing. And yes, one way to encourage growth in said new revenue stream is to reinvest in the user experience, helping the players.
>mfw the switch's library expands
>>378213202
Then why does the netcode still suck dick in every online game?
>>378209971
Jokes on you
I'm just a fat loser. I don't watch anime
>>378208682