BORN
>>378087957
INTO A PACK
>>378087957
DIFFERENT
>>378088023
THERE'S NO CHOICE
>>378088023
WITH NO CHOICE
>>378088357
BUT TAKE ORDERS
BUT TAKE ORDERS TO ATTACK
>>378088548
TO BE WILD
AND IT WILL FLOW
THE UNENLIGHTENED MASSES
What the fuck was his problem?
I just bought this game and it's great. I'm not a fan of how loose the combat/running feels but the bosses are really well designed.
>>378087957
INTO THE MEMES.
Why do people think platinum games is overrated (in the literal sense that it's worse than people perceive it)? I have yet to hear anyone say something along the lines of, "platinum games is a great studio" yet the universal consensus seems to be that they are overrated.
>>378089529
Contrarians?
Mgrr is sublime. Korah was meh. Idk about the rest of their stuff.
>>378090593
What test is that?
>>378090593
>>378089196
>I'm not a fan of how loose the combat/running feels
Give me examples of games you consider to have better combat.
Daily reminder that
Sundowner = Armstrong > Memeson > Handjobs > Uma delisamurai
>>378092646
How is that neo-conservatism? Wouldn't that be a world focus and not a national focus?
>>378093365
It's because I strongly agreed with having a strong military and the like, which I'll assume the maker of the quiz associated with being a warhawk.
>>378093478
I got this, but I'm not sure it's actually correct.
I think those values are closer to moderate because I strongly agree and disagree on normally contradicting views. Like saying that people should be treated equally but disagreeing that gay marriage is immoral, or saying that traditional values and the family unit are very important but also saying that drug use, prostitution and scientific progress even to the point of human engineering is fine.
Instead of moderate overall it should be more like extremism depending on the issue.
>>378087957
IN A WORLD OF STRIFE
>>378094362
Agreeing that gay marriage is immoral, rather.
>>378093478
Strong military is predecessor or tyranny and enforcement of the will of the wealthy over the populace.
It's never a good idea unless your sovereignty is threatened.
>>378092646
>try to take this test
>get bored by the third question
What political affiliation does that make me?
>>378094530
I'd partially agree with that, but as long as the citizenry is armed it doesn't really matter.
Also the answer changes if you're a US citizen or not, given that you can agree that the premise is true but also have to side with high military spending because the US already drastically outpaces military spending across the rest of the world, licencing other countries not to even bother as much.
>>378094614
an asshat
>>378087957
MY WILL
TO FIGHTTHE KNIGHT