>he ACTUALLY plays games at 1080p 144fps

>>377814332
>£550 for 1080p

Jesus Christ, OP.

>>377814332
>[...]GAMING
>paying extra dosh for flashing lights and marketed sham

What the fuck? I paid £200-300 for my 144 1080 monitor, AOC brand

>24.5
>2007 resolution
>TN

Cancer

>>377814332

Ill just buy it in a few years when its a fraction of the price.

>>377814332
>TN

>>377814332
4k @ 60 > 1080 @ 144

File: 1494193305048.jpg (86KB, 500x307px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 500x307px

>he doesn't play on a 32 inch 4k ips with gsync

File: 1470806520126.jpg (21KB, 500x632px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x632px

>>377814332
>240hz
30 FPS meme aside is it really fucking possible to see fps that high?

>>377814525
this is 240hz not 144 and it also has gay-sync which always increases price by a buttload for no perceivable benefit.

>ROG
>that stand
ASUS make good shit but their branding is fucking hideous and I refuse to buy anything ROG branded

>>377814616
It's more about feeling it rather than seeing it.

>>377814616

As a expert meme analyst who has used a 4k 60 and a 144fps monitor, your eyes can definitely see higher than 4k or 144 fps.

Wiggle the mouse and it becomes obvious you can see higher (not really worth paying money for though)

>>377814332
>Republic of gamers
why is this a thing?

>>377814616
translated motion, no
vibrating or shaking motion, yes

>>377814332
240 is great, but it's hard to push for many games, some engines are hardcapped at 200 or less.

That said

Frames/Refresh > Resolution > Graphics

Which one is better?
>Triple 24 inch 1080p60hz Monitor
>One 27 inch 1440p144hz Monitor
>One 27 inch 2160p60hz Monitor

>>377814332
I plan to get a 1440p 144 Hz freesync monitor this summer when Vega comes out and if they have a decent ~400€ card.
Preferably VA, but unfortunately IPS and TN are both far more common.

Would have already bought one this month, but alas, my 3.5GB VRAM cripple will have to hold me over a little longer.

Your eyes can only see a frame per 4ms anyway

>>377814332
>TN
still waiting on a 1080p hdr ips gsync monitor to exist

>>377814924
>One 27 inch 1440p144hz Monitor

>>377814639
>for no perceivable benefit.
Adaptive sync is a great feature, doesn't matter if it's Freesync or g-sync.

I'm sticking with intel integrated until a GPU that can handle 120Hz at 4k comes out.

>>377814924

2 >>>>> 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 for gaming

Including general use, youtibe, work etc aswell as games

2 = 3 >>>>1

>>377814947
That's what I have, and free-sync/g-sync is stupid. The monitor is fucking godlike. I have the acer one and I can't recommend it enough.

>>377815159
>free-sync/g-sync is stupid
Objectively wrong.
Sounds like you're just too stupid to enable it.

>>377814924
>>Triple 24 inch 1080p60hz Monitor
this

i don't play video games and i have space on my desk

>>377814947
VA is slow as shit which is why it's so uncommon. It tries to incorporate advantages of both TN and IPS but doesn't really do a very good job.

>>377815361
>VA is slow as shit which is why it's so uncommon.
It's faster than IPS. Reaction time and g2g.

>but doesn't really do a very good job.
I got a BenQ AMVA monitor and it does a very good job.

You probably just googled the term right now and think you know what you're talking about.

so what do you guys play with all that hardware

>>377815231
Not him, but it's literally meme tech. Higher framerate is always better than capping under refresh rate and lowering settings to get a higher frame rate is better than maxing out graphics settings and playing at 30-40fps. G-sync/Freesync literally only benefits shit-eating casuals.

>>377814332
nigga I can barely reach 100fps on my 144hz monitor as it is, what do I need 240hz for

i bet its amazing for porn

>you will never have an 32" 8K 240hz ultra-thin CRT monitor that plays good video games at 240FPS

>>377815545
>playing at 30-40fps.
Adaptive sync also works when you're at sub-144.
Don't you know?

Having 60 Hz and perfect adaptive sync is already a massive step up from normal 60 Hz.

>>377815076
>4k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_PnCKK_Nhc

>1080p
>2017

shiggy

>>377815718
>ultra-thin CRT
What a stupid thing to say.

>>377814332
>muh 26744 Hz
>meanwhile there's like three 32'' 4k monitors under 700€
I hate this retarded gaymur meme.

>>377814332
>1080p
Is this 2005? Do people still use that out dated resoultion? That's sad

>>377815509
minecraft mostly

>>377815821
Again, having a higher framerate is always superior. Instead of spending money on memesync, put that money towards a better GPU and get a better frame rate.

>>377815994
>What a stupid thing to say.
Yeah because why should I want a thin monitor when I can have an 80lb box on my desk taking up most of the room :^)

>console plebs will never know what 240Hz gaymin feels like

>>377815868
How long will it take to get 8K at 60FPS, 2022? Plus Linus couldn't even get most games running even TF2

>>377814985
translated motion yes, vibrational/rotational no

>>377816081
>Again, having a higher framerate is always superior.
Again, even at something like 90 Hz it will feel leagues above 60Hz non-adaptive.
At 100 Hz you will start to get rather diminishing returns and some people will enjoy the richer detail or things like downsampling more you can get from those e.g. 44 fps.

Besides, with adaptive sync you don't HAVE to have 144+ FPS all the time. Because the the variable Hz rate of your monitor from, let's say, 120 to 144 Hz will not be noticable from you.

>>377816085
You are clearly not aware what makes a monitor thin and what doesn't.

>>377814581
Which ones are good? I want to upgrade mine.

>>377816385
ok

1070 cant do 4k max 60+fps

>>377814616
Yes. To see individual frames and recognize them as such? You're beyond that already at 60 FPS. But there's still two things:

- Feeling of smoothness contributed by lower time between frames. A milisecond or two doesn't sound like much but it translates into something more readily understandable by the brain. Animations become less "stroboscopic".
- Less sample-and-hold blurring. This one is more readily apparent. In terms of this, we ought to go up to 1000 frames per second where things become as sharp as a CRT (or strobed LCD) but without strobing.

>>377814850
Marketing department in charge of being down with the kids. And it's porbably working out, fuck if I know. Kids are kids.

>>377814924
Tough question. For competitive gaming, 240hz 1080p, easily. For single player games where visuals are important, I'd always recommend a VA over an IPS, so probably that Samsung ultrawide that goes up to 100hz, I forget it's name. I think 1440p at 27'' is a meme with very little advantage over 24'' 1080p in terms of sharpness (and preventing aliased edges). But if going up to 27'' 4k means you're limited to 60hz, well, that's a bummer man.

>>377815361
How the fuck does VA "try to incorporate the advantages of a TN"? The only advantage of a TN is faster pixel responses which means being slightly less trailing than a IPS. What VA monitors attempt is stronger black levels and they achieve that. They trail perceptibly more than VA and TN monitors, but it's nothing at all important in single player games. You'll notice the piss poor contrast of IPS and TN monitors a lot more than a bit of trailing.

>>377816081
There's nothing meme about it, freesync and g-sync offer more visual clarity by removing tearing. Tearing is readily apparent even at 144hz. And if you're strobing, it is a very apparent eye-sore. I wouldn't know about 240hz.

File: CostanzaPixels.jpg (6KB, 378x378px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 378x378px

>>377814332
>TN

>>377816464
>They trail perceptibly more than VA and TN monitors
I meant to say IPS and TN.

>>377814332
rog is a dumb name and that stand is gauche

>>377816385
>Again, even at something like 90 Hz it will feel leagues above 60Hz non-adaptive.

Who are you even talking to? You literally made up something up, then started arguing against it.

200 fps on a 144hz monitor > 142fps on a memesync 144. It literally does not get any more simple than that.

>>377816692
>200 fps on a 144hz monitor > 142fps on a memesync 144
The difference is absolutely negligible.

>>377816464
Only autists give a shit about tearing. Higher frame rate > removing tearing

>>377816418
I have the xb321hk and it's great. Generally well reviewed also.

>>377816776
>Only autists give a shit about tearing
What a bizarre thing to say.

But I guess a meme-spouting shitposter does have to shitpost all the time.

>>377816771
>I'm a shitter and can't tell a difference

Good for you, I guess that settles it. Have fun with your memesync slideshow toy.

>>377814581
>He doesn't play on a 7 inch 3 Paмкa with ysoup

>>377815545
Consistent framerate is better than wildly spiking and shifting framerate. I'd rather have my eyes get used to a steady 60 fps than deal with a game that fluctuates from 80-120 fps. If you can manage a constant 144fps all the better, but consistency/stability is the most important thing for me.

>>377817139
Consistent high frame rate > Consistent low frame rate

A 240Hz monitor is amazing for motion clarity.

Literally 0 blur in any game even when Motion Blur is enabled in the game settings. It's actually pretty amazing.

File: The_Dungeon_tg__summonancienthorror.png (93KB, 768x800px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 768x800px

>1000:1
>Literally no contrast

File: 24-260-239-01.jpg (24KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 640x480px

I use U3415W at work and love it. Will probably get one when I replace my current monitor at home

>>377817179
That's what I said, consistent 144 is better, but if you can't achieve it I'd rather stay locked at whatever fps I can steadily pull that is best divisible by my monitor's refresh rate to prevent tearing. So 72 on a 144hz display.

>>377817139
Or you can use minimum graphic settings like everyone else does and have 300 FPS minimum in Crysis.

>>377814639
>no perceivable benefit
Confirmed for never having used adaptive sync.

I agree that G-Sync is way overpriced, though, they should just do the right thing and support Freesync.

>>377817198
What games actually run consistently above 240FPS on non-supercomputer hardware, though?

>>377814578
Autism speaks.

>>377814332
>1000:1

why?

>>377817698
Shovel Knight probably

>>377816776

The primary advantage of a higher framerate is more visual clarity. Tearing gets in the way of visual clarity.

>>377817698
Visual novels

>>377817825
>He believe in meme numbers for the contrast
Why?

>>377814850
Because it sells. For some reason.

I'm using an ROG laptop right now, but I bought it for the specs, not the branding.

>>377817983
Higher framerate not only gives better clarity, but better input, both of which trump capping below refresh rate to eliminate tearing.

>>377818113

Do you know what the "meme numbers" represent or are you trying to sound knowledgeable and confusing static contrast ratio (which the 1000:1) represents with dynamic contrast ratio which you've heard somewhere is not properly representative and now you're confusing it with static ratio?

File: 1372517651952.png (145KB, 332x371px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 332x371px

>>377814332
>gsync
>tn
>24.5"
>1080
This is literally made for CSGO and that's it

>>377815329
Then get an Ultrawide

>>377818191

You're capping only a small amount.

I can't speak from direct experience - I haven't tried either freesync or g-sync so I can't speak about the amount of input lag it adds to the proceedings, but something tells me it's completely negligible if you're capping just below 240 FPS.

>>377814924
One 34" 3440x1440 100Hz monitor for casual gaming, and one 27" 1440p 144Hz monitor for fast paced games. I have a triple monitor setup, and while it's awesome, I'd rather not have the bezels.

>>377814332
higher fps monitors are nice but i dont see the point in paying a "gamer" premium to use it.

If monitor tech is like tv then that feature will eventually move into mass market as feature padding to inflate the price, Like always.

>>377816081
But freesync adds no extra cost to the monitor.

>>377814545
>>377814564
>>377814986
>>377816598
>>377818241
>wanting IPS glow
Kys, TN is still the best panel type.

>>377817698
Every single game. Turn down the settings nigger. I get around 220 FPS on Witcher 3 at High settings.

>>377814332
>16:9
lmfaooo

>>377819841
>TN is still the best panel type
Ahahahahahaha

Fucking retard. TN is deprecated ugly shit

>>377814616
it still looks a tiny bit better, especially when playing games that go fast (racing, action, shooters)

that aside, it doesnt make sense to play things at a frame rate that is higher than the game's internal tick rate. some games (fighting games) have a 60 tick rate, so you get literally no benefit from anything above 60 fps.

also even the most absurd hardware will have trouble putting out 240 frames per second in any modern game

>>377814924
easily the triple monitor setup.
for me personally, 1080p@60fps is good enough to enjoy games. in fact i wouldnt even mind 720p@60fps.
but two full additional montiors providea ton of utility. i'll take them over the single high res monitor, easily.

>>377815486
VA is terrible at high refresh rates because of easily perceived ghosting. Not that anon.

For gaming, TN or IPS is best. The high end IPS panels seem to have shit quality control.

I got a 1440p 144hz gsync monitor for around 400. I love it. Dell something or another