What games feature practical female armor?

>>377722483

The ones where whatever armor you equip doesn't actually show on your characters.

>>377722483
Fuck your b8 thread and fuck you.

>>377722483
Mountain Blade.

skyrim nexus

>practical female armor
You mean females in practical armor, a breastplate is a breastplate and if you make boobs on it a mace would break your sternum.

File: mb10.jpg (197KB, 1280x954px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1280x954px

>>377722834
Is this what you call practical?

>>377722483
Women don't do battle. Therefore any game with females in combat is unrealistic. Women are weak and lack testosterone. They're simply not built for killing.

This is the truth. You may not like it, but that doesn't change anything.

>>377722483
Who cares???

>>377723308
That's right brother. We also need to start removing other problematic aspects of gaming that aren't realistic, like magic, monsters, EXP rates, day/night cycles happening in a 20 minute time span. I mean it's only fair.

File: 1442069333046.png (5KB, 371x200px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 371x200px

>>377724137
Who said anything about removing, faggot sperg? He asked a question about what is realistic. I gave him the answer. I said nothing about removing.

In fact I softly implied that his question is stupid and that realism in video games doesn't matter.

>>377722483
>female armor

>>377724372
>realistic
No one mentioned realism until >>377723308 sperged or baited

>>377723014
It's realistic to the "era"

>>377722483

unironically The Elder Scrolls (if you take out the Anime huge tit monster + katana mods)

File: 1476481826974.jpg (57KB, 499x559px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 499x559px

>>377722483
>female
>doing anything but breeding males

>>377724691
The entire thread was about practical armor. What do you think "practical armor" means? Obviously it means "functional in realistic combat; i.e. true to life."

I pointed out that there is no such thing as medieval female armor that is "true to life" because fucking females are weak as shit and never fought in combat in the middle ages. Then you sperged and said "WULL I GUESS WE SHOULD JUST REMOVE ALL ASPECTS OF GAMING THAT AREN'T REALISTIC LIKE MONSTERS AND MAGIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" which is a fucking implication nobody made.

You're fucking stupid. Just admit you're wrong and have no reading comprehension. You got yourself into this retarded position by misreading what I originally said then getting angry about it.

The only good armor I've ever seen on a female character in a video game was Titania in Fire Emblem.

>>377725187
lol your stupid

>>377725187
Fantasy autists
Not even once

>>377725187
The term "practical female armor" means females wearing armor is a given and you want a setting where it actually is armor that provides protection

File: 42df2ed93822a813a1eefe79d3dd166b.jpg (449KB, 2000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 2000x1500px

>>377722483
Granblue Fantasy

>>377726912
This armor is practical.

Practical for lewd things.

>>377722483
females lack strength and resistance, therefore a small armor that protect and help their nimble (as opposed to a guy wearing 100 punds of metal) small bodies is better.