Let's have a Speccy thread

no im k ty tho

File: specs.png (25KB, 626x509px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 626x509px

>>377442719
My rig is okay but god I hate my GPU. Idk why but not mater what I use whether it's Crimson, Catalyst, or Evolved nothing seems to make my games optimized cause they'll freeze or lag. I had a laptop before this rig and it had Nvidia and would play games no problem. I'm probably gonna just buy a new one

>>377442990
pls bby

File: speccy super 144.png (40KB, 676x527px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 676x527px

>>377442719
>craptop

File: 0.png (36KB, 674x532px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 674x532px

rate my beast

>>377443651
12/10

>>377443215
>AMD
Found your problem

File: Resized_20170519_144551.jpg (89KB, 658x524px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 658x524px

>122 c

File: owAMDCN[1].png (45KB, 770x567px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 770x567px

Running the monitors at 1440p for now until EVGA restocks their GTX 1080Ti FTW3s and I don't miss it again. Used to have to 980s when I got the monitors, but sold one thinking I'd have a 1080 Ti soon.

CPU is overclocked to 4.5 GHz but doesn't go over 70°C under load. Just have it idling at ~60 because of the noise.

File: speccs.png (20KB, 448x388px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 448x388px

>>377442719
loving this build, to lazy to throw in my tbHDD

File: Untitled.png (39KB, 1002x533px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1002x533px

My 7 year old PC with a gimped 3gb 1060 can play every game available today at 1080p 60fps high settings.

People who buy the most expensive builds are actually mentally ill because that power will never be utilized.

>>377444039
>980

Damn, how does it feel having a card that was rendered obsolete in a single gpu gen. Even the GTX 1060 wipes the floor with the best of the 9xx series.

>>377444729
I don't really care.
They've served me well up to me buying two 4k monitors recently, and I'm upgrading as soon as I can.

File: Untitled.png (40KB, 725x548px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 725x548px

inb4 >meme card
I haven't had any issues with my card. Though I am eyeballing a 1080 in a few months maybe.

File: sendhelp.png (39KB, 709x538px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 709x538px

gonna be building a new rig soonish. Having trouble deciding between the r5 1600 or an i5 7600k

File: specs.png (136KB, 757x653px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 757x653px

>>377442719
P-please validate me
I need more RAM, one of my 8GB GSkill went bad a few months ago

File: speccorum.png (41KB, 797x605px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 797x605px

r8

>>377443215
Hmm

File: specs.jpg (110KB, 843x532px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 843x532px

My card gets a little hot playing Overwatch but otherwise works fine.

File: Sem Título.png (36KB, 646x512px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 646x512px

>>377442719
Any chance I could play the Witcher 3 on my school laptop?

>>377448326
Why do you have 4 virtual CD trays in a laptop my dude?

File: file.png (39KB, 515x433px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 515x433px

>>377442719
This is my toaster.
Well, It's better than nothing.

PC Master Race = The one with a Desktop PC with most recent and powerfull setting as possible.

File: specs.png (39KB, 747x547px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 747x547px

Never noticed that speccy can't read M2 drives

>>377447929
What are you using to cool your HD and cpu?

>>377448432

Daemon tools has 4 since I installed it, and I never bothered to remove them

Is it bad?

>>377448664
No, I was just confused.

>>377448158
>i6
>DDR7
>Vita
>Fahrenheit 451
>ATARI

chuckle/10

>>377448880
You're missing maybe 10 or so more things.

File: specs.png (34KB, 652x440px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 652x440px

Built this thing late 2013, added more RAM a few months back.

File: speccy.png (42KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 660x525px

>>377442719
Still no reason to upgrade from a 2600K. Running at 4.6GHz for 24/7 use, though it'll do 5GHz.

>>377446582
>32 gigs of ram
For what reason do you need so much?

File: computer.png (36KB, 768x453px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 768x453px

>>377442719

Behold my ancient build. All I've upgraded is the GPU and even then it what upgraded to was ultra budget.

Oh well. It works. That Phenom 965 is still ticking.

>>377449524
Heavy use of Photoshop, After Effects and other editing for videos can get quite RAM intensive.

File: specccy.png (71KB, 906x553px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 906x553px

should i be worried the RAM is unknown?

>>377447696

It's fine. Why do you need validation for having one of the better rigs here?

>>377449687
It's DDR4, right?
That's normal, Speccy still can't figure that out properly for some reason.

>>377449970
I was just joking senpai. Thank you though

>>377449687
Speccy is garbage that hasn't been properly updated in a couple of years, so doesn't detect DDR4 properly.