Are 4k hdr TVs worth it for playing video games?

>>377345695
If you can run 4k. Yes.
Ps4 pro is not 4k

>>377346469

Both consoles are upscaled?

I played 40 hours Horizon at upscaled 4k on a PS4 Pro. If you can afford it and are an enthusiast, then I'd recommend it. If you aren't much of a graphics snob , then I'd say stick with a 1080 screen.

Not right now if you're talking about consoles. Wait for PS5/NuXbox for legit 4k games.

File: 027e01bcfbac44de00962f80c61e7457.jpg (97KB, 538x900px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 538x900px

>consoles
>4k
maybe in 10-15 more years and still in 30 fps

>>377345695
no most recent game dont even run in 4k anyway

>>377346742
Yes. The graphics cards alone to run native 4k cost more the the consoles. Your getting a 1080p image with ×4 more pixels. Not a 4k image.

If you have literally no eye for latency

>PS4's dont support 4k blurays
>4k bluray/UHDs are fucking expensive
>streaming services only have very few shows in 4k
>cable doesnt offer it yet

why tf is everyone trying to sell 4k so bad

>>377349086
it's fucking brilliant for PC monitors