PS4 PRO vs GTX 1070 Is this true that a PS4 PRO have similar

File: gpus.png (102KB, 1218x954px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1218x954px

>>377104768
no, it has similar specs as the RX 470

>>377104768
>>377105378
it's actually an RX 480 with 911mhz clocks instead of 1266mhz clocks.

>>377105667

>a gimped 480

Oh so an RX 470

>>377105860
RX 470 is 1206mhz and down 512 shaders to 1792 shaders
PS4 is 911mhz but the full 2304 shaders

>>377105378
Passmark is shit

The 1070 costs $400, so that's a big fucking no.

The biggest problem with the Ps4/Pro is the dogshit processor anyway, it's bottom barrel garbage.

No.
Not even close.
You can do direct game comparisons although it varies because PC games vary in optimization, but from experience the Pro doesn't even scathe the 480/1060.
Partially because it aims for high resolutions like 1440p/1600p which it can't fucking handle but it's not doing great in terms of raw power either.

Also the rest of the components aren't great.
It has dedicated processing for the OS which is nice but still only 8GB of shared memory and the fucking internal HDD uses a SATA 2 to USB connection.

>>377104768
No

>>377106192
Its AMD's equivalent to Atom

why they chose to make a console based off that is beyond me

>>377104768
>>377105378
>>377105667
The base PS4 GPU is weaker than a 660ti, its CPU is a variation of tablet tier CPU, and the only good thing about it is the 8gb of ram. PSPro is the same but overclocked. The big difference is in the optimisation.

When taken individually, console components cannot compete with "modern" PC components. Even at release a console is already 2 years behind. You can't expect a console to compete with a PC in terms of raw power when it costs that money, they already sell them at a loss, have to put all the components+controllers+bluray player and it's tiny, so they have to be low performance to be able to cool down with shit fans.