ITT: We guess ARMS metacritic score

>nintendo first party

70 + 15 manchildren points

>>376910140
87

54. Gimmick crap

>>376910140
87. 91 at absolute best. Novel but not revolutionary.

>>376910195
(you)

>>376910140
90

78.

Screencap it if you dare, cited issues will be a weak story mode and awkward tablet controls.

>>376910140
Im gonna guess a high 70 but since its Nintendo we'll go ahead and add about 10 extra points

>>376911403
Fuck off samefag

85
79 after the Jim Sterling review

>>376910371
>awkward tablet controls
Are you retarded?

>>376910140
86-88

>>376910140
78 or similar. Has its moments but might fall into the Pokken category. Hopefully there's a lot of content and ranked online play

>>376910140
92
because despite how shitty a game is, if it's made my nintendo, everyone loves it

>>376913393
No, it's basically been proven that playing without motion controls is way worse than playing with them. So handheld mode would have awkward controls.

It's a new IP, so they'll probably give it a mid 80s score and call it a day

I'd say 83 or 84

>first party switch game

yeah, there's no way that it isn't at least 95

>>376915061
you're a moron
a salty, irredeemable moron

>>376910195
>>376911403
>>376913992
>>376915061
>nintendo games have never gotten low metacritic scores
wew

Whatever the last two digits are.

>>376910195
>>376911403
>>376913992
>>376915061
Because god forbid a game is actually good right? And let's conveniently forget the plethora of Wii U and 3DS games that got mediocre and bad scores

58

>>376915653
>53

Ouch

84

>>376915336
>>376915842
I don't care how good the game is, if it looks like it belongs on a PS2 and is released in the current day then it doesn't deserve to get more than a 70.

File: 1488555491122.jpg (228KB, 916x920px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 916x920px

>>376916141
go back

>>376916141
>f it looks like it belongs on a PS2
Here's that (You) you longed for

>>376916141
Oh I get it now. Not "open world" enough for you? Clearly it lacks the cinematic feel of a 2017 game. Where's the QTEs and the Ubisoft Towers?

74.

It'll be a 65 at best but since this is Nintendo add another 25 points

>>376916439
Epic post my dude

>>376916278
>ITT: pics that are no longer relevant

>>376914512
>No, it's basically been proven that playing without motion controls is way worse than playing with them
Proven by who?

>>376917413
nobody cares what some fat cuck thinks :)

It's probably going to be an 80.

Deez digits

>>376910140
Right around 70. It'll be an alright game, but Nintendo promising a game for "core gamers" has never, ever boded well.

File: Concerned Fox 1.png (44KB, 139x142px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 139x142px

>>376918015
>15
Ouch.

65-70

>>376917779
keep denying reality bud

>>376919019
Like the reality that the Switch got a better game than every single thing avalaible on PS4 ;^)?

File: arms.png (68KB, 654x325px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 654x325px

LOL

Anyone care to do the average of this thread?

I'll say 85

Obvious answer is lower than what it's worth. Same thing as splatoon, basically.
Sales should be 2-3 millions, maybe more if switch really take off.

File: C9x0fz9UQAAG8dj.jpg (108KB, 944x1200px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 944x1200px

79
They'll say something like the game itself is very good but the content is lacking.

>>376919185
They'll never make a non-FE game again.

Depending on content on launch and what the online infrastructure is like, it'll score mid 80s I think.

>>376910140
>8.1 crows
>8.8 dicks

>>376919680
They're still making those garbage 'action-adventure' paper mario games.

>>376919298
Average is 76.

>>376910232
>>376910243
>>376913456
These anons have it right. It'll be an 87

78-82

They'll praise the gameplay if not saying it's a little shallow compared to other fighting games
They will criticize the control scheme and the poor use of the wagglan.
They'll say the content is lacking
They'll praise the artstyle and graphics
They'll criticize the lack of online features

Seems pretty obvious to me.

>>376919185
>Murican pandering
>Ugly artstyle
>Le geek man

I am glad this game failed in all fronts.

>>376920356
>They will criticize the control scheme and the poor use of the wagglan.
Everyone who's played it says this is good though.

30

>>376920356
>Shallow gameplay
I could see this. As much as I like what I'm seeing so far it doesn't seem to have combos, you just keep pelting each other until a super comes out.
>Control scheme
Disagree. I think reviewers will herald it as "what Wii Boxing promised us it would do 11 years ago"
>Content lacking
Yep. It will get updates post release and you'll have reviewers come back and add a few points like they did with Splatoon, but I fully expect it to be pretty barebones at release
>Praise artstyle
Yeah
>Criticize online
Probably. For some reason I wanted to bring up Pokken's awesome online only to forget that that was Namco

I think it'll get between 85 and below 90. High 80s.