Leave 2017 to me

2018*

2019*

Wonder how long it'll take them this time to implement the heist-equivalent to Read Dead Online

File: BOTW-Share_icon.jpg (237KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1200x630px

Don't worry, I've got it covered

>seven samurai/magnificent 7 game

i may just buy it for Ps4 on launch instead of waiting for PC release

>>376855551
If they neglect single player for online I'll fucking flip.

>>376855378
>2017 Rockstar
Will they actually implement random events in an open world environment, filled with largely nothing? Of course they won't. They'll spend their budget on character models, and the rest on ways to get money from online players.

>>376855551
Chances are we won't get heists. Instead they'll implement all the gang and property shit for a while. Even the single player looks like you're building a gang rather than having a set of characters.

There's no way it's going to be as good as the first. Still gonna buy it though.

>>376855378
>a group of badasses
>they all use different weapons/specializes in different skills
Why is this trope so unrealistic, so overdone, but still so fun.

>>376855787
You mean red dead revolver?

>>376855591
This

Do you guys still get excited for Rockstar games? I think they are in the habit of neglecting game mechanics too much, and they go the pretentious route more often than not (ugly main characters, filler missions that drag on forever and are a horrific ordeal to repeat, so on and so forth).

RDR had good qualities, some amazing details always show up in Rockstar's stuff, but I've always found it to be too boring (a bad cover-shooter) and full of fluff. It's got a great feeling when you first play it, though.

That's not Ape Escape 4

File: RDR 2 Poster.jpg (586KB, 1414x2000px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 1414x2000px

NEW TRAILER FUCKING WHEN?

>>376856308

Having ugly main characters isn't pretentious

>>376855378
I don't want it to be fucking around with multiple playable characters, it was okay in GTA 5, mainly when not doing missions, but character switching during missions was junky.

>>376855630
I'll be pretty disappointed if that happens. I played a bit of GTA Online, but the novelty of it wears off so quickly. I'd much rather some traditional expansion packs so the single player campaign can continue.

>>376855969
The game is called Red Dead Redemption 2, not Red Dead Revolver 2 or Red Dead 3.

>>376857216
how about you shut your red dead retarded mouth up before i flog yuh!

>>376856475
this month
my wifes son works at ISIL

File: Eric_Morganson.jpg (445KB, 700x701px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 700x701px

I know it's unlikely, but I hope to high heavens this based fucker makes a return in multiplayer

>THESE COLORS DON'T RUN! HOOOAAAAH
>IT'S A GOOD DAY TO DIE!

>>376857216
Doesn't mean it's not the third in the series, dummy.

>>376855630
After how much money they made on gta5 online theyd be silly to even think of having a single player mode. Incoming grinding mmo in the wild west guys, buy your own ranch apartment for only $20 of shark cards

File: raw.gif (124KB, 220x275px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 220x275px

>>376855378
>it's gonna be gta online all over again