Anyone getting? >inb4 6 hours, no co-op or PVP campaign.

>>376786165
I want to, but my back log is huge.

Looks like hot garbage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW4Kp48YOn4

if there's no multiplayer, there's literally no point.

>>376786165
It'll probably get put on the back burner for a couple years and once I finally try to play Dark Souls 3 I'll play it afterward when it's $2

Figured I'd give it a shot given a few people I follow said to not judge it on past blunders.

>>376786165
>from this company that has only made shovelware, another Dark Souls clone but in a generic futuristic setting

>>376787156
Or free on Ps+
Like most people did with Lords of the Fallen.

>>376786402
I hate people like you. The devs said there's no multiplayer because they're focusing on the single player experience, and that's a great thing.

>>376788065
Under 10 hours long is pretty piss poor if you're focusing on single player only content

>>376786165
It's made by a literallywho dev and will most likely be thoroughly mediocre.

How can anyone care about this after playing shits of the fallen?

Not if it's as bad as Lords of the Fallen

>>376786165
i'll probably get it, i liked lords of the fallen. i just hope this game is a lot longer