Predict it's Metacritic score
somewhere between 80 and 100.
>>376661586
What it will deserve: 45
What it will receive: 97
>>376661586
98.
95
Arms will be a 91
Splatoon 2 will be an 83
96
then after jim sterling's review is up 95
>>376661586
85
Game is actually a 60 though.
>>376661736
I dont get this, its not out yet, we havent seen any real gameplay, and we dont even know the story how could you possibly say the score it deserves?
>>376661948
because it's a nintendo mario game. have you played one of the many nintendo mario games of the last decade?
>>376661738
this even if it turns out bad
>>376661586
>its*
89
>>376661736
Good thing nobody asked what you think it deserves.
98
>>376661586
>nintendo in charge of drawing earth
i had my suspicions that those ching chongs were dumb but they just set the record
>>376662139
Yeah, Super Mario Galaxy is the best game that decade
>>376661715
I'm guessing 97. Both Galaxy 1 and 2 ended there, so that seems to be the score for perfect 3D platformers.
>>376662347
>nintendo in charge of drawing earth
It's Dearth
this one has a 3D World like feel
Doesn't feel grand like SM64 or Galaxy
85-95
From what has been shown so far, it won't dethrone galaxy
>>376661586
"Back to its roots"
"Finally the Mario game we waited for"
"A welcome twist on the formula"
96 regardless of how good it is.
I wish 50 was average.
95
It's gonna get 93.
It's gonna have some annoying problems that drop it down across the board. I'm calling it right now.
Just about every review is gonna complain about these one or two things that detract from the game overall and the meta score will tank because of it.
>>376661586
97
>>376661775
>ARMS will be a 91
only if every reviewer is a ninten drone
>that feel when you realize that you are convinced nintendo doesnt know how to make a solid mario platformer anymore without some annoying bullshit attached to it
>>376665439
They have specified it's a return to mario 64 style open world
>>376661775
reverse the arms/splatoon 2 scores are you are correct
>>376661586
99 before dropping down to 98 2 weeks later
>>376666736
splatoon is gonna lose major score for being an unambitious sequel
>>376661586
94, but why stop there?
I predict 90 for Splatoon and 85 for Arms.
>>376664530
>>376661586
98
normies and manchildren love jacking off to mario
>>376661586
95~96. 3d world was a 93 and this looks better than that.
>>376661586
A perfect 100
>>376666828
Mario Kart 8 Deluxe has a higher metacritic score than Mario Kart 8
96
It's not going to be that good in actuality though.
>>376662139
The 3D ones? They've been amazing. Galaxy/Galaxy 2 were fucking fantastic.
>>376667926
Titles close to launch tend to have high scores. You can look at just about any launch title for that.
>>376661586
my two last digits
It will probably get a ridiculous score like a 98 or something because video game critics are privileged ivy league kiddies who always give preferential treatment to nintendo
95 critic, 76 user
>>376662197
dummy, its it's
>>376661586
the last 2 of my post no. will be the score this game gets.
>>376669564
>95 critic, 76 user
Kek
99 with 91 user after Sonybro reviews get purged
>>376661586
96
I don't think theres a 3D mainline console mario that has a score lower than 90
98
>>376661586
97-98.
Sonybros and the whiny bitches created by TORtanic will lose their minds just like with BotW.
What even is the appeal of this garbage? It's not even fun, all the games are basically the same thing, etc. To me mario is pure shovelware at this point but dumbass normies keep eating it up. Just stop.
>>376670679
play the games
>>376670862
Why would I waste my time playing this crap. Mario is pure gameplay and that's not good enough.
Upper ninety's, likely a 98. Then a few weeks later Jim Sterling will come out and give it a 6/10 for some attention.
In other words, exactly the same situation as BotW.
>>376671080
to find out whether it's actually fucking fun or not, i'd imagine
>>376671264
It's not fun. I don't need to play it to know that. I play games to enjoy a story and a cerebral experience, not to press buttons for mindless entertainment
>>376671080
>pure gameplay
>in a video game
>not good enough
Go watch Uncharted then
98
>>376671372
well buddy, i didn't have to fuck your mom to know she's a whore, but it sure helped
>>376667926
Mario Kart 8 isn't a sequel, it's an enhanced port.
Splatoon ins labeling itself as a direct sequel.
>>376669157
>source: my ass
>>376671080
>Mario is pure gameplay and that's not good enough
The first 100/100 game.
It gasbag everything esp the nostalgia of being a m64 throwback.
90-93. While it's probably going to be the best in its genre in many years, 3D platformers are generally not well received these days. I can't predict whether they fuck it up or not, but if it builds on Sunshine it deserves above 95.
>>376671559
Gee that's a really impressive argument you've got there buddy
>>376666730
>Mario 64
>Open world
has a Mario game ever gotten universally bad reviews?
>>376672029
Not a main series game, no
>>376666689
Why not? Galaxy 1 and 2 were masterpieces, 3D Land was fun, 3D world was fucking fantastic, and NSMBU was the best 2D Mario since SMB3.
Mario doesn't have a fucking main series dude. There's literally no canonical storyline it's pure gameplay garbage. Referring to a "main series" for mario is a complete joke
>>376672004
i don't need to participate in this argument to know that it's fucking retarded
/v/ - The only place online that contains people that want a Mario game to fail
>>376672205
SMW is the best 2D mario though
>>376661586
my last two digits
It was kinda cool.
But then the hat had eyes...
why.
>>376672302
It's just falseflaggers, no one needs to question whether a mainline Mario game will review well or be good.
>>376672409
I don't think that will be the case during gameplay, probably just when it's talking to you.
100
>>376661736
tpbp
there is no nintendo game out there that isn't overrated (maybe majoras mask)
>>376672450
I for one am being honest, can't speak about the rest of the thread though.
me
>>376671940
>>376672486
>>376672549
MM is the most overrated game in its series
>>376672549
>Proceeds to name the most overrated one
>>376671372
93, critics.
Mostly 10/10 from critics but there will be some who will rate it 7 or 8 because mario. Possible that a very low score review might come. Might come from Jim Sterling
67, users.
PS/Xbox users will shit talk the game for no reason.
>>376672621
>>376672660
at least it was original, which can't be said for 99% of nintedo products.
>>376672982
So you literally cannot comprehend that someone might genuinely not like your mindless jumping simulator?
>>376671372
>>376671080
>>376670679
These are the worst bait posts of all time, but we all know that there always needs to be a red herring in the movies Sonygers love so much.
>>376673117
So far everyone in this thread who has claimed to not like Mario has never actually tried playing a Mario game
>>376672368
Also a fine choice. I love SMW as well.
>>376673026
>literally cobbled together from bits and pieces of a better game
>original
>>376672982
>there will be some who will rate it 7 or 8 because mario
Can /ourguy/ do it again?
>>376671080
This guy and that faggot who spends threads shitposting about how he doesn't play games with any unnecessary additions (ie story, multiplayer, voice-acting etc, posts a lot in TF2 threads I thin) should have a fight to the death
>>376673191
>>376673290
acfag vs anti-acfag?
>>376673248
He gave MK8D a 9/10, didn't he?
>>376673197
>has never actually tried playing a Mario game
You don't actually believe this shit do you? I'm 30 years old. I grew up with Mario. I also grew OUT of it and now look for more from my gaming experience. When are you gonna grow up, kiddo?
>>376673583
>>376673117
That's the point I'm making, most critics will jerk off to the game, some will complain the gameplay is still the same which I would agree with for most mario games.
>>376673583
>kiddo
THIS IS THE LAST TIME I'M DEBASED BY SOME FUCKING SUB-HUMAN, INBRED, VIRGIN. I'M MAKING A MENTAL NOTE HERE: YOU CAN FUCK YOURSELF WITH A RUSTY SHOVEL. I BET YOU ALSO ENJOY IOS GAMES YOU SILLY BITCH
>>376673725
Oh, it's a manchild temper tantrum. How typical
>>376673793
>falling this hard for copypasta
>>376672021
He probably means open levels, the game being a collection of platforming sandboxes instead of linear obstacle courses.
Nintendo isn't much help either when describing their games either, since they tend to use made up bullshit terminology.
>>376673878
>Says the guy who has been giving me (You)s all over the thread
I genuinely do think mario games are a shitty waste of time, though, and have zero respect for nintendo fans
82
>>376673938
So then why not call it a sandbox like it is?
Calling Mario 64 or Sunshine open world is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.
>>376673974
These (You)s are something we shared with each other, baby.
Cherish them.They are all we have.
>>376674182
I don't think it's either. Sandbox only describes the level design. I think Nintendo uses the term "open level" to describe it, if I recall correctly. Confusion can arise understandably.
>>376672621
MM is literally one of the only games that successfully breaks franchise conventions, too bad Nintendo forgot how to be original AND good at the same time.
10 because is nintendo game