[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

HOLY FUCK

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 514
Thread images: 132

File: PC BTFO.png (334KB, 905x308px) Image search: [Google]
PC BTFO.png
334KB, 905x308px
HOLY FUCK
>>
LITERALLY WORKS ON MY MACHINE.

IGN confirmed for not knowing anything.
>>
File: IMG_0350.jpg (44KB, 422x408px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0350.jpg
44KB, 422x408px
>>376562517
>>
>>376562517
4.0
>4.0
4.0
>4.0
4.0
>4.0
4.0
>4.0
4.0
>4.0
4.0
>4.0
4.0
>4.0

HOLY SHIT THAT'S LIKE BELOW 0 ON THE IGN SCALE
>>
4 because of a bug? kek
>>
>>376562517
Who forgot to pay IGN?
>>
>>376562517
PREY FAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
ITS OVER
OVER
V
E
R
>>
>>376562753
I think it's only fair

going "lol, they'll fix it I'm sure 9/10" is fucking retarded, make your damn game work at launch jesus
>>
"4/10 - Game of the Year"
- IGN
>>
>>376562517
It's about time games got punished for having bugs.
>>
>>376562517
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>
File: you.png (229KB, 800x774px) Image search: [Google]
you.png
229KB, 800x774px
>>376562517
>>
>>376562517
Based IGN

Fuck bugs, polish your fucking games devs
>>
>>376562517
>Giving a game a low score because of a bug only you experienced
That's pretty fucking immature
>>
>>376562517
WEW
E
W
>>
>>376562517
>bad review because of a bug

I mean if the game is buggy it's a valid complaint, but they didn't think to check it on their other employees' machines? Is IGN that barebones now?
>>
>Game gets punished solely because of a bug
>Meanwhile 8-10s for Fallout/TES games are still going on
>>
They now follow /v/'s video game scoring.


Jesus fucking christ this board is so shit it HAS become meme magic.
>>
>>376562970
>>376562945
>>376562950
>W-WORKS ON MY MACHINE!

HAHAHAHA
Defense force is in full force I see
>>
>>376562945
CRY
MORE
>>
What was the bug?
>>
>>376562862
They could have simply laid off the review until it is fixed. They should review the game and not a bug.
>>
Meme magic is real
>>
>>376563095
Save-Corruption.
>>
File: 1491391897725.png (131KB, 290x262px) Image search: [Google]
1491391897725.png
131KB, 290x262px
>>376562517
>Its real

have they ever given any other games shit tier reviews purely thanks to game breaking bugs?
>>
>>376563008

this

WTF?
>>
>>376563141
>They should review the game and not a bug.
But how can one review Todd's masterpieces with that logic?
>>
>implying this isn't a shot at bethesda for doing away with early copies
>>
>>376562517
Is this going to turn into another Gertsmann situation? Going by the usual IGN scale 4.0 basically means that the reviewer has a personal vendetta against the devs.
>>
L M A O
M
A
O
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LIiB3ZCfGo
>>
File: 1490399080857.png (269KB, 592x533px) Image search: [Google]
1490399080857.png
269KB, 592x533px
>PC gaming in 2017
>>
>>376563141
Who says it's going to be fixed?
Dishonored 2 was never fixed and that came out ages ago

And this review is ONLY for the pc version
>>
Doesn't matter normies will still eat up this fps movie game crap no matter how bad it is.
>>
>>376562517
Why is it that the Fallout and Elder Scrolls series gets a free pass for game breaking bugs but any other game gets blown the fuck out for the same reasons?
>>
>>376563184

>given game of the year awards
>>
PC gaming?

aaaaaaaaHAHAHAHAHHHHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>376562517
>We've given buggier games with shittier releases 9/10 before
>so this bug actually really matters guys

This is just an example of them lashing out at Bethesda for not letting them get an early review copy. While they should mark against bugs, the fact that they've let worse go before for much less makes this suspect.
>>
>>376562517
Woah... the power of the PC!
>>
>>376563285
Patch this week. Doesn't help people that have corrupted saves, though this is why you should always make multiple saves.
>>
>>376563348
>A blatant newfag complaining about normies
Did you even read the thread, retard?
>>
>>376563410
The bug is real tho
It's not like the guy made it up you cunt
>>
>>376563182
Usually its the opposite, They have given every Bethesda game since Morrowind 9.5's.
>>
>>376562517
>HOLY FUCK REVIEWS SUDDENLY MATTER
Neo-/v/ everyone.
>>
>>376563463
That's not the point he's making dipshit. Games like Fallout 3/NV/4 and Skyrim were FAR buggier than Prey, yet they didn't get their scores slashed in half.
>>
File: 1369021045132.jpg (24KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]
1369021045132.jpg
24KB, 413x395px
>One dude managed to speedrun the game in 10 minutes on the first day
>IGN can't even finish the game once
>>
File: 1480730650366.jpg (78KB, 680x454px) Image search: [Google]
1480730650366.jpg
78KB, 680x454px
Was it with PC and it not being respected by devs with half assed ports?

How many times will this keep happening?
>>
>>376563463
He never said it wasn't real
>>
>PS4 getting good games
>Switch getting good games
>Scorpio is happening
...
...
...
>PC getting 7 year old ports and broken games
haha....
Aha..ha..ha
Haha..haHA
ahaHAHAHAHAHAHABAHAHAHAH
BAAHHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>376563141
they often update reviews later on nowadays for things like that

also for multiplayer aspects due to servers often being dead/unpopulated during review phases

but then you have players who want to know what state the game is _right now_ to know if they should buy, wait, or never get -- and that review is there, showing the shiny 4/10

there is nothing wrong with this.
>>
>>376563273
Oh shit I'm sorry
>>
>>376563584
>reading comprehension
>>
>>376563463
How Can The Bug Be Real When Saves Aren't Real
>>
>>376563221
IGN doesn't have any reviewers with integrity to fire over. Bethesda just forgot to give IGN some advertising money so they don't give a shit about their game.
>>
File: 1491358240249.png (128KB, 316x259px) Image search: [Google]
1491358240249.png
128KB, 316x259px
>PC """"'""""""""""""gaming""""'""""""""""""
>>
>>376563285

I thought Dishonored 2 was fixed?
>>
pc masterrace
>>
>>376563614
>PS4 getting good games
haha....
>Switch getting good games
Aha..ha..ha
Haha..haHA
>Scorpio is happening
ahaHAHAHAHAHAHABAHAHAHAH
BAAHHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>376563463
When did I fucking deny that? I said their motives are suspect, they're doing it to lash out over Bethesda's review policy. This bug is a bug games have had since forever, them suddenly acting like it's a big enough deal to say the game is an irredeemable pile of shit reeks of a temper tantrum when they let the exact same slide before.
>>
>>376563580

This. I'd respect them more if they were at least consistent about it.

>>376563586

Prey was developed for PC first.
>>
File: hla.gif (401KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]
hla.gif
401KB, 400x300px
>>376563584
you can actually beat the game in 5 minutes since after the starting area you can glitch through and fall all the way to the end.
>>
File: 1446109012055.jpg (16KB, 274x368px) Image search: [Google]
1446109012055.jpg
16KB, 274x368px
>Be me
>Knew something wrong is gonna happen with Prey
>Just look a Dishonored 2
>Rave reviews on every platform
>Till now
I fucking hate Arkane
>>
>not completing the game in one sitting so you never need to load the save anyway

Why are reviewers so casual these days?
>>
>>376563773
>Pcbro slowly slipping into insanity as he writes his post, tears in his eyes
Pathetic desu senpai
>>
File: hoer.png (131KB, 241x245px) Image search: [Google]
hoer.png
131KB, 241x245px
>>376563203
Luckily our hero, a lover and friend of the very important consumer, always keep IGN's payments in day.
>>
>>376563764
Needing two 1080's just to get consistent framerate is not fixed
>>
>>376563773
>the current state of PC
Ahahah..
*cough* *cough*
hahahHaha
*tonsil stone*
HAHAHAHAHAHhahahHaHahah
BAAAAAHAHAHAHAHBAAHAHAHA
AHHHHHHAHAHAH
>>
>>376563723
Sure, I didn't meant that the guy has an ounce of integrity, more along the lines of him being fired and using it as a platform for some other thing.
>>
>>376563949
That's a fucking lie, it was stable on my 980 at launch. The framerate problem seems to be less optimization and more engine bugs.
>>
So this is the power of the PC masterrace.
>>
I had the exact same bug. It got patched and fixed 2 hours ago in a beta patch.
>>
File: fag.jpg (107KB, 623x473px) Image search: [Google]
fag.jpg
107KB, 623x473px
>>376562517
>>376563257
>>376563273
>PC save bug got fixed already
>the input lag on the console version still hasn't been fixed

really strudels the noodle...
>>
>>376563451
>A blatant newfag
Funny joke, anon. I've been browsing 4chan since 2006. Try again.
>>
File: IMG_0539.jpg (96KB, 920x900px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0539.jpg
96KB, 920x900px
>>376562517
As a PC gamer.. please delete this.
>>
>>376562517
so i assume this means oblivion, skyrim, and fallout 3 all get 4/10 too, right?
oh wait, ign is inconsistent trash nm
>>
>>376564183
Your reply and his accusation are both the worst content posts i have seen all day.
>>
File: Screenshot_2017-05-10-20-47-49.png (268KB, 1080x1301px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2017-05-10-20-47-49.png
268KB, 1080x1301px
Really makes me think.
>>
>>376564119
>0.5
>>
>>376564119
>give the game a 4/10 for a bug fixed on the exact same day

I would say it was bad timing, but they actually fucking publicized the bug fix before their review came out.
>>
>>376562517
God dam if ign gave it a 4.0 on its 9/11 scale, it must be total dogshit
>>
>>376562517

Oooohhh I feel a firing coming on!
I didn't even believe this was real when I seen it, as funny as it is and who knows maybe the game is shit this seems really unprofessional to destroy a game over a bug it sounds like he had a hissy fit because he encountered a glitch
>>
>ME:A got a 7 despite having an absolute metric fuckload of bugs and glitches
>Prey gets a fucking 4
I mean, a 6 would have been passable, but a 4? Now that's fucking harsh.
>>
So have the devs commented on said bug?
>>
>>376564183
So you've been browsing 4chan for 11 years and still haven't learned basic reading comprehension. That's actually worse.
>>
>>376563868
I'll believe it when I see it.
>>
>>376562517
hmm this totally isn't motivated by the fact that Bethesda has stopped giving press released games.
>>
Alright, I'm officially out of touch. I thought this game was great. I'm enjoying it a lot. It's probably third place in my GOTY ranking.
>>
File: 1434511004911.png (163KB, 299x299px) Image search: [Google]
1434511004911.png
163KB, 299x299px
>>376564341
giving them money goes a long way, even if you know the game is going to get bad reviews.
>>
File: 1487615220535.jpg (84KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1487615220535.jpg
84KB, 1280x720px
>>376562517
There's no way this game is any worse/broken than Andromeda. Does the gay sex really make a 3-4 point difference?
>>
>>376564348
not only have they commented, they fixed it.
>>
>>376564348
They already fixed it, the review score is practically void.
>>
>>376564348
see:
>>376564119

Already patched.
>>
>>376564370
6 min. actually.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pc8aZTn3fnk
>>
File: 1432670735257.jpg (45KB, 512x397px) Image search: [Google]
1432670735257.jpg
45KB, 512x397px
>People still care about what video game "journalists" and "reviewers" have to say about video games
>>
File: image.jpg (50KB, 400x310px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
50KB, 400x310px
>>376563586
>>376563257
>>376563273
>>376563412
>>376563740
While you bait about a save-corruption issue that affects a marginal fraction of players, the PS4 has such terrible input lag that it's Metacritic is five points lower overall
>>
>>376564348
They have. And fixed it.

IGN are fucking ingrates who are grossly selective about which bugs they even acknowledge. A game that is fundamentally broken with no chance of getting fixed gets a 9.5, but Prey gets a 4 because the reviewer encountered a bug that was not only fixed a few days later, but was far from guaranteed to affect every player and doesn't reflect on the game's actual design at all.
>>
>>376564542
>>376564558
sponge-mind
>>
>>376563392

I dont remember any game breaking bugs in Fallout or Elder Scrolls

Bugs? Yes plentiful and never ending, but game breaking? No.
>>
File: download.jpg (6KB, 204x204px) Image search: [Google]
download.jpg
6KB, 204x204px
>>376564290
>bugs
9.5

>bug
4.0
>>
>>376564558
>>376564542
WITNESSED
>>
>>376562517
This is fucking bullshit, there are far buggier games than Prey.

There's no way in fuck it deserves to have its score slashed in half because of it.

What you're supposed to do is fucking deal with it, reload a save if necessary, and beat the game. You fucking review it as normal, give it a, say, 8/10, subtract a point for the bug making it a 7, and then warn people to delay buying until the game is fixed. But lazily slapping on a fucking 4?

No way in hell this isn't some kind of petty retribution against Bethesda. They're pissy they didn't get a review copy, and thus, they're pissy they don't get as much ad-bucks on their website because they weren't first out the door. The bug delayed a proper review even further, possibly making it so that they'd have to wait ANOTHER day to get it out the door, so they just got pissed off, decided not to even bother beating it, and just figured they'd fuck up the score.

That's what happened here. They may have even deliberately given it a bad score to drive traffic to their review and thus compensate for their viewcount since they didn't get a review copy.

What a cunt.

And anyone making this about console war shitposting is a retard as well.
>>
>>376564558
>>376564542
sponge-mind
>>
>>376564642
Fallout NV had a bug where if you played it for more than 10 hours, loading time when you entered a new cell would start to increase exponentially making the game unplayable.
>>
>>376564642
>>
File: 1463125353700.jpg (36KB, 505x505px) Image search: [Google]
1463125353700.jpg
36KB, 505x505px
>>376564542
>>376564558
>>
File: 466545-800px_chadwardenn_large.jpg (7KB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]
466545-800px_chadwardenn_large.jpg
7KB, 300x200px
>>376562517
Who here /console/? Feels good to be playing on the superior platform, Sony always wins baby
>>
That's definitely a fair score if the game has game-breaking bugs, but it's not at all consistent with their other reviews. I mean they gave new Vegas a good review and that might be one of the buggiest games I've ever played. They gave VLR a good review and that game deleted your progress if you saved in a certain room. I had to replay 30 hours of content just because I saved in a puzzle room.
>>
I love this game, but it has hard-crashed my PC to the blue screen with the ":(" on it 8 or 9 times now. I save constantly just in case, but it seems to be about a 15-20% chance when transitioning between areas of the station.
>>
>>376564542
>>376564558
Not that's a Hi/v/emind.
>>
>>376564642
Didn't Skyrim get buggier and slower the bigger your save file on PS3? Until it wouldn't load anymore.
>>
>>376564656
They should stay consistent and give buggy reviews high score, amirite? Let's not improve our practices.
>>
>fantastically explorable
What did he mean by this?
>>
>>376564290
HAHAHA
HOLY SHIT
This is what happens when you forget to pay the reviewer.
>>
>>376563518

>'IM FRESH NEW!'

This shit has been going on forever

Don't you even remember more recently 'FINAL FANTASY X4.0'
>>
File: 1455817281742.jpg (2KB, 58x72px) Image search: [Google]
1455817281742.jpg
2KB, 58x72px
Why aren't the other Bethesda games scored like this?
>>
>Reviewed by Dan Stapleton; editor in chief of IGN
Well there you have it folks. He's mad they didn't give him an early copy of the game.
>>
File: 349.gif (94KB, 500x285px) Image search: [Google]
349.gif
94KB, 500x285px
>IGN
>4.0

Holy fucking SHIT what is the ACTUAL rating then?

-5/10?
>>
File: 1417841033420.jpg (30KB, 316x202px) Image search: [Google]
1417841033420.jpg
30KB, 316x202px
If only Bethesda had listened to the wisdom of based Kotaku and provided review copies, this low score could have been avoided.

http://archive.fo/nYkaR
>>
>>376564642
the first time i played fallout 3 i got a save corruption bug
the first several times i played fonv i got save corruption bugs
the first several times i played oblivion the scripting broke so badly i couldn't finish certain questlines
skyrim refused to play on my machine until a certain patch
>>
>>376562945
All of his save files became corrupted and unplayable after more than 30 hours of gameplay. I would give the game a bad score too if that shit happened to me.
>>
>>376564642
They had all sorts of bugs. Plenty of save corrupting bugs, as well. Skyrim and Fallout 3/NV also had bugs that prevented you from completing quests.
>>
is there another spot i can get the qbeam other than the hardware labs
>>
>>376564895
WITNESSED
>>
don't fuck with IGN i guess.
>>
>>376562517
>Game has a bug
>Give it a "bad" rating
Almost as terrible as giving God Hand a 4 because you suck at video games
>>
File: 2.jpg (7KB, 230x219px) Image search: [Google]
2.jpg
7KB, 230x219px
It's almost like hiring people for one project and then dumping them for fresh meat to burn out finally caught up with the AAA industry.

t. bitter ex-industryfag
>>
They gave Skyward Sword a perfect 10, and that game had a bug that would fuck your save file completely. And it didn't get patched for over a month.
>>
>>376564426
I've got bad news for you, anon. You're a braindead normie.
>>
File: 37602452[1].jpg (26KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
37602452[1].jpg
26KB, 400x400px
>>376564656
>game has more features
>gets higher score
>>
File: 1484229907229.jpg (51KB, 500x387px) Image search: [Google]
1484229907229.jpg
51KB, 500x387px
>>376564895
>>
>>376564872
Still higher than they gave God hand.
>>
>>376564891
Sure, but that doesn't seem like professional behavior.

Oh wait.
>>
>>376562517

Fair enough, reviewers need to be paid too. They'll just have to tip harder next time for those Bethesda/Nintendo scores
>>
>don't get review copy
>Missing out on sweet sweet day 1 review traffic
>Give game a 4
>Ensure clicks and ad revenue
>>
File: 1494192115248.jpg (147KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
1494192115248.jpg
147KB, 800x600px
>>376564719
To be fair, nobody should have to put up with truly game breaking bugs. Having a deathclaw stuck in a wall is one thing, but corrupted saves making the game unplayable and wiping your progress shouldn't be tolerated and the score should reflect that.

Now with that said, the bug has already been fixed. Moreso, any saves that were corrupted have been fixed as well. In fact, the fix might have even been out BEFORE the review was released. While games with bugs should be called on their bullshit, its not fair to judge a game based on fixed bugs.
>>
File: 1338781264912.png (17KB, 560x407px) Image search: [Google]
1338781264912.png
17KB, 560x407px
What is up with Arkane and gamebreaking bugs? There's an unpatched bug in the PC version of Dishonored that I ALWAYS run into when I try to play it. In the first mission, after you sneak into the museum/palace and have to eaves drop in on a conversation with one of your targets, some game breaking bug always happens and the level becomes impossible to beat.

It's a shame because they usually have very impressive lore/world building and interesting games, but they can't seem to fix their most fatal stuff in QA/testing.
>>
File: 9outof9.png (267KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
9outof9.png
267KB, 800x800px
>>376564895
sasuga
>>
>>376564872
Thats not how review scores work on /v/. Anything that is 8.5+ is irredeemable shit, anything 5/10 or lower is actually the secret GOTYAY and you are a retard for not thinking the same.
>>
File: commence.jpg (28KB, 500x555px) Image search: [Google]
commence.jpg
28KB, 500x555px
>>376564895
>>
>>376565003
Do normalfags like this game? I've only been hearing mixed reactions outside of /v/.
>>
Anyone else think something fishy is going on with reviews for this game? It's no worse than any other AAA game from what I can tell, yet those never drop below the sacred 7.5.
>>
IGN aren't fans of the way Bethesda is handling review copies.
>>
>>376564119
>>376564291
Seriously, it's like the devs are screaming WE HAD TO LAUNCH IT UNFINISHED at the top of their lungs, given the kind of contracts game studios sign.
>>
>>376564891

Apparently the patch that came out the same day also fixed previously corrupted saves.
>>
I see the bethesda shills are out in full force tonight.
>>
File: 1472949385120.jpg (12KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]
1472949385120.jpg
12KB, 512x384px
>>376562517
It's all ogre.
Ripperoni Prey 2.

F
>>
>>376563141
No, absolutely not, you review the game you played now, not how it might be in the future.
If a publisher wants to release a broken, buggy game that's on them, reviewers should not make excuses for a game and assumptions that errors will be fixed.
That's an error on the company for releasing it on such a state, people who may buy the game have to know what is wrong with it, delaying the review will just screw over the people that could have benefited from knowing such relevant information.
I honestly have no idea why you would think in such a manner.
>>
File: 1470457030611.png (145KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]
1470457030611.png
145KB, 1500x1500px
>>376564895
>>
>>376564895
>Get on top of a double hivemind
>>
>>376564895
N-NANI?!
>>
File: 234.jpg (277KB, 1001x674px) Image search: [Google]
234.jpg
277KB, 1001x674px
>>376564542
>>376564558
>>376564895
>>
>>376565121
>fps
>movie game
>bethesda
Yes. They do.
>>
>>376565141
Well if that's the case then he should revise his score to reflect that patch after finishing the game.
>>
this would make sense if it was a console game back in the days of no online updates but not for a PC game which had a patch released fixing this before the review even dropped.

Still though this actually gives me slightly more faith in 2017 IGN
>>
File: 1452514095289.jpg (399KB, 1777x1754px) Image search: [Google]
1452514095289.jpg
399KB, 1777x1754px
>>376564895
This thread: Confirmed Magical
>>
That's actually very stupid. Andromeda got better reviews despite being a complete mess. And Prey is leagues better
>>
File: IMG_1795.jpg (499KB, 900x1197px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1795.jpg
499KB, 900x1197px
KILL YOURSELVES PCKEKS

KILL YOURSELVES
>>
>play a game pre-release
>get upset when there are bugs in it
what the actual fuck?
how does this guy even still have a job?
>>
So, should I just buy it on PS4?
>>
File: kogsly.png (215KB, 800x1188px) Image search: [Google]
kogsly.png
215KB, 800x1188px
>>376564895
>>
>>376564758
Switch + Xbone materrace
>>
>>376563008
A broken clock is right twice a day
>>
>>376565226
>movie game
Not really.
>>
>>376565070
The review came out an hour ago, so it most certainly had already been fixed. Therefore, the score is even more fucking retarded.
>>
>>376565292
Don't buy this normie shit at all. Stop encouraging the destruction of the game industry.
>>
File: 1470873284224.jpg (22KB, 400x602px) Image search: [Google]
1470873284224.jpg
22KB, 400x602px
>>376564895
>>
Should I play on hard or Nightmare? Is Nightmare artificial difficulty?
>>
>>376565098
It's a 4/10 from a major backed publisher. God Hand was published by a company that barely had any funds at the time and developed by a studio that couldn't afford to keep the lights on, let alone paid off.

4/10 by Zenimax is fucking huge. That's a score AFTER shill points and bribes are factored.
>>
>>376565290
Not a pre-release and that's the entire point. Bethesda doesn't send out early copies to reviewers anymore.
>>
Dan Stapleton is notoriously incompetent and stupid, his reviews hold no fucking water. He's the same retard who couldn't even beat the first boss of Bloodborne and bitched there was no shortcut because he was too dumb to find the one in the room next to the bridge.
>>
>>376565394
nightmare isn't really too fun, just try hard
>>
File: 1493071974043.jpg (156KB, 1003x767px) Image search: [Google]
1493071974043.jpg
156KB, 1003x767px
>>376564895
FUCK
>>
File: 1485320516290.jpg (137KB, 692x692px) Image search: [Google]
1485320516290.jpg
137KB, 692x692px
>>376564895
>>
>IGN's review goes out on the same day it's patched
>>
File: 55555.jpg (55KB, 555x555px) Image search: [Google]
55555.jpg
55KB, 555x555px
>>376564895
>>
>>376565394

The game seems to have been balanced around Hard, from my experience.
>>
>>376565289
WHO IS THIS SEMEN DEMON?
>>
>>376565425
yeah, stapleton is kind of a tremendous faggot
>>
>>376565425
Seems to be a recurring theme with IGN. They gave Alien Isolation a sub-6 score because the reviewer didn't realise the alien AI adapts (to a point) to your tactics, literally dying hundreds of times from hiding in nothing but lockers.

The incompetence is stunning.
>>
File: 6.gif (80KB, 315x411px) Image search: [Google]
6.gif
80KB, 315x411px
>>376564895
nice but first
>>
>>376562517
>bitching about bugs
>same website that gave PS3 Skyrim a 9.5/10
>the game infamous for save files ballooning to such sizes that they refuse to load, dragons flying backwards, and the "we have no idea if this system will ever get the DLC" thing
>>
File: 1494196565065.png (342KB, 619x700px) Image search: [Google]
1494196565065.png
342KB, 619x700px
>Amazing JRPG gets mediocre score from biased American reviewers
"Totally spot on fuck weebshit in my /v/!!!"

>Shitty fps movie game like all the others gets a bad score because it literally doesn't work
"THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!!"
>>
>>376565315
>Nintendo
>>
>>376565794
>amazing
>jrpg

pick none
>>
>>376565794
>shitty FPS movie game

Have you actually seen people play the game beyond the intro or are you just one of those people that memes too much so they appear retarded?
>>
File: 1312115823346.jpg (11KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]
1312115823346.jpg
11KB, 228x221px
>>376565794
The best part is if it were a console exclusive like Horizon, you'd have a slew of fanboys defending it.
>>
>>376564719
>No way in hell this isn't some kind of petty retribution against Bethesda
Is it really "petty" if most of it comes from the idiotic claim that they wont let reviewers have early copies so that "everyone has fun at the same time", or whatever their bullshit explanation was?
Of course, this does not apply to genuflecting youtubers/streamers who are in no way beholden to bethesda, even though the fact that bethesda lets only them play early is probably their most defining characteristic.

I agree that they are behaving extremely childish, but bethesda LITERALLY started it.
>>
>>376565794
why do i get the feeling this supposed amazing jrpg is a neptunia game
>>
>Still using IGN

Zero Punctuation's review when?
>>
>>376564891
I like Prey but I would do the same desu ne. I'd also give Fallout 4 a 1/10 for all its fucking bugs
>>
File: carlton-banks.jpg (17KB, 192x240px) Image search: [Google]
carlton-banks.jpg
17KB, 192x240px
>>376564895
>>
>>376565794
Flip the green and you're right.
>>
The IGN reviewer hits "Publish" and closes his Macbook with a resounding slam. He cracks his knuckles, leans back in his chair, and takes a sip of his latte. Adjusting his thick-framed glasses, he thinks to himself with a satisfied smile, "Dan, you genius, you've done it again. What a power play." He admires his Undertale figures on his desk before resuming thought, "This will teach Bethesda not to mess with IGN."
>>
File: 1491516785118.png (108KB, 527x431px) Image search: [Google]
1491516785118.png
108KB, 527x431px
>>376564558
>Input lag.

I honestly thought that was my TV or something for awhile when I was playing the demo. The input lag was so bad that I didn't even bother finishing the demo.
>>
>>376566042
I'd give Fallout 4 a shit score even if it didn't have any bugs at all. It's a fundamentally poorly designed game.
>>
>>376565718
These are people who think they know something about videogames, yet they grew up playing exclusively Nintendo games and other ultra-casual mainstream shit.
They are so insecure that the moment they face a mechanic that's even remotely different, they curl up and start to compensate for their lack of insight and terrible taste by shifting the blame.
>>
File: 1494196831998.png (988KB, 1080x1174px) Image search: [Google]
1494196831998.png
988KB, 1080x1174px
>>376566030
It's not. I just really like these pictures of nepnep
>>
File: 7.jpg (44KB, 400x580px) Image search: [Google]
7.jpg
44KB, 400x580px
>>376564895
I need some life pls
>>
I thought there were no enemy insects in the game.
>>
>>376565794
>movie game

It is literally System Shock 3, KYS
>>
>>376566080
DON'T. FUCK. WITH. I-G-N

bitch
>>
7
>>
>>376562862

Except they've literally done that for other games by major companies. It's kinda bullshit.
>>
File: rmyt.jpg (120KB, 845x594px) Image search: [Google]
rmyt.jpg
120KB, 845x594px
>My "Someone is trash talking us PC Master Racers" sense is tingling!
>>
File: 1486001690977.gif (2MB, 325x235px) Image search: [Google]
1486001690977.gif
2MB, 325x235px
>fallout got a high rating and its a game thats bugged from top to bottom
>Ign
>Credibility
>>
File: 2893745.jpg (14KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]
2893745.jpg
14KB, 300x225px
>>376566227
>>
File: 1469761106621.jpg (10KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]
1469761106621.jpg
10KB, 320x320px
>>376566227
>>
>>376566227
N...nani?!
>>
>>376566227
this thread really is magic
>>
>>376565718
Reminds me of the time the IGN reviewer bitched about the game having no ending, then when the developer called him out on playing easy mode (which ends early) all the reviewer did was silently remove that paragraph from the review, score stayed the same.

game might have been pixeljunk sidescroller?
>>
>>376566014

I don't what IGN has done to bethesda specifically to not make them hand out early copies but it makes sense that they did it to Kotaku tho'. After all they were the ones that leaked the ending to Fallout 4 for no reason as well as their journos would endlessly hound the developers about irrelevant shit and trying to start pointless controversies.

All in all the review just seems to have came out at a very unlucky time. The only fair thing to is for IGN to re-review the game again so they can give it a proper score now that it's fixed.
>>
>>376564724
Doesn't that have more to do with loading autosaves instead of manual saves? (It was a issue with many of Bethesda's open world games)
>>
File: 1481608445843.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]
1481608445843.gif
2MB, 480x270px
>>376566227
>>
File: 1488536247803.jpg (29KB, 412x430px) Image search: [Google]
1488536247803.jpg
29KB, 412x430px
>>376566135
It's not even regular stupidity, it's some advanced near-intentional shit. People who never play video games would have figured this shit out. Using the A:I reviewer as an example again; this guy somehow missed all the preview material talking about the alien and how it adapts. He didn't consider changing his tactics once; someone who's never played a fucking video game in their entire lives would have thought "this isn't working, what if I try another strategy?", but not this guy. He insists that hiding in the lockers is the way to go despite dying literally a hundred times from doing so, then he calls the game's AI frustrating because it won't tolerate a one trick pony.

The stupidity is fucking unbelievable.
>>
>>376565718
In the case of Alien Isolation, they just gave that review to the absolute wrong person (Ryan McCaffery). He literally only plays COD, Halo, Destiny and Nintendo stuff. His reviews of other games have been reasonable. Dan Stapleton on the other hand has no fucking excuse. Literally every game he has ever reviewed he has struggled with in some way or whined about the difficulty. He gave DoW 3 a good review saying It's the best RTS in years but even still bitched about "complexity" and said the AI in the campaign was too hard. He's fucking worthless. My patience with him is gone, he's been there for many years as basically their only PC reviewer and he has fucked up like this almost every single time. As a patron of the site, I'm done putting up with it. They need to fire him, he shouldn't be doing this for a living.
>>
File: 1492873716874.png (2MB, 1400x696px) Image search: [Google]
1492873716874.png
2MB, 1400x696px
>>
>>376566227
what
>>
>>376562517
>Mass Effect Andromeda is a buggy, ugly, poorly coded piece of shit
>Can't piss off massah EA, they'll fix everything there's still a good game underneath!

>Run into bug
>Literally who studio
>Rather than see if it's repeatable just sandbag the game

I'm not even saying it's any GOOD, the demo was pretty meh. But this just kinda reeks of the usual review bias bullshit.
>>
>>376566412
Will Trails of Cold Steel break 300m sales?
>>
File: 1461457963568.gif (555KB, 555x555px) Image search: [Google]
1461457963568.gif
555KB, 555x555px
>>376566412
Will I get another 5?
>>
>>376566412
Should I ask her out?
>>
File: 1489613657317.png (572KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]
1489613657317.png
572KB, 600x580px
>>376566412
>>376566356
>>376566227
>OY VEY THEY'RE SHITTING ON US, r/pcmasterrace! SHUT IT DOWN
>>
>>376566303
is that a dhamel
>>
>>376562517
this is what happens when bethesda doesnt pay for reviews. Theyve really thrown this game under buss
Just imagine the same shit said about skyrim
>>
>>376566491
Woops, I meant 300k not 300m. 300m is fine though
>>
>>376566510
No, it's an Elvaan.
>>
>>376566412
will i be happier dead
>>
>>376566384

Don't forget that review they did of D44M
>>
>>376566569
THE TOTEM HAS SPOKEN
>>
File: gimmedattreasure.jpg (22KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
gimmedattreasure.jpg
22KB, 400x400px
>>376562517

is this the lowest score a game has ever gotten from IGN by, like, 2 full points?
>>
File: 1476992344188.jpg (30KB, 457x480px) Image search: [Google]
1476992344188.jpg
30KB, 457x480px
>>376564895
>>
File: 1424915051698.jpg (88KB, 902x464px) Image search: [Google]
1424915051698.jpg
88KB, 902x464px
>>376566227
>>
>>376562517
>gamebreaking bug
>IGN
>translate "there was no handholding"
>>
File: works on my machine.png (441KB, 1600x1548px) Image search: [Google]
works on my machine.png
441KB, 1600x1548px
>>376562565
here you go, baby
>>
>>376566569
lel
>>
>>376566610
Wasn't that Polygon?
>>
File: image.png (262KB, 500x497px) Image search: [Google]
image.png
262KB, 500x497px
Fucking petty that he publishes this despite the fix already being released, what a shitty reviewer.
>>
File: 1421885791501.jpg (57KB, 500x369px) Image search: [Google]
1421885791501.jpg
57KB, 500x369px
>It doesn't work on my machine
>>
>>376566227
>>
File: ad5d883333854d75d8.jpg (49KB, 1011x655px) Image search: [Google]
ad5d883333854d75d8.jpg
49KB, 1011x655px
>mfw reading the comment section on this article
>>
>That IGN comment section
>>
>>376562945
this should be fucking common among video game bloggers ake "journalists".
Severe game bugs or a bug ridden game needs to be punished with a shit score.
>>
So Bethesda intentionally didn't pay off reviewers (or payed them for negative reviews) as an excuse to break up this studio, right?
>>
>>376566412
Do I still have a shot with her?
>>
Still a better game than God Hand.
>>
>>376566656
Polygon was responsible for the absolutely atrocious preview videos of both DOOM and that System Shock remake. It was like my grandmother trying to use a controller for the first time.

I think IGN's DOOM review was just done by a fucking idiot. It's the base assumption to make about that site's reviewers; you'll rarely, if ever, be wrong.
>>
File: 1494196700078.png (831KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1494196700078.png
831KB, 1080x1080px
>>376566829
>just jerk off
>>
>>376566656

Oh wait, that's right. My mistake.
>>
>>376566829
KEK
>>
What score did they give ME:A
>>
88% on steam, with same PC ver. Bethesda done paying to IGN for good score?
>>
>>376564724
Oblivion completely breaks animations a number of hours in and requires the unofficial patch to avoid this. Not fixed in console versions and requires copying the save over to PC and running a fanmade tool on it.
There are NPCs that are poorly pathed like a guy in Chorrol who is scheduled to walk on a bridge that was removed before release so he will fall to his death if the player is there at the right time of day. Oblivion is poorly coded and has a lot of potential divide by zero errors that can cause seemingly random CTDs and if you dont crash it will corrupt your next save.

Skyrim has several save destroying bugs that were never patched. If you kept on visiting an area with nirnroot but never picked it the nirnroot grow would grow every single time you enter the area and not disappear if you picked it.

Worst of all, in all TES and Fallout games NPCs can straight up disappear, and youll have to use the console to move them to you. If youre on console youre fucked and have to drop the main quest.
>>
File: lol.png (476KB, 1203x350px) Image search: [Google]
lol.png
476KB, 1203x350px
>>376566919
>>
File: 1477419360621.png (30KB, 186x160px) Image search: [Google]
1477419360621.png
30KB, 186x160px
2
>>
idk if giving it a 4/10 was the right move obviously it's just done for clicks but I'd have probably postponed my score or put a BUYER BEWARE at the end.

Because he literally called it a great game and in an industry where people only look at a number score the 4/10 doesn't tell the whole story.

Or maybe even contact the devs and find out if there's a fix.
>>
>>376566829
>>
>>376566984
*nirnroot glow
>>
>>376566412
will i get a gf ;3
>>
>pray it works
FUCKING TOLD HOW WILL ARKANE EVER RECOVER!?
>>
File: ign.png (122KB, 1611x532px) Image search: [Google]
ign.png
122KB, 1611x532px
>nu-/v/ unironically likes IGN
>>
>>376564541
So this is the power of cryengine
>>
>>376562517
the "same website" gave it a 9.1
>>
5
>>
>>376562517
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

THANKS FOR BETA TESTING PKEKS
>>
I love this game and I'd give it a solid 8/10 at least. If I were to experience this bug, I'd knock that review down to a 7. It's not an acceptable bug by any means. But a 4 isn't a reasonable score to give it for that either because the game itself is great.
>>
I wonder what IGN would give FFVII on the PC when the game crashes at the choccobo prison race.
>>
>>376566767
>>376566775
Screencaps?
>>
>>376562970
M8 everyone at IGN is a woman and/or still. Listen to any of them and it's obvious when they're told to like things. They insisted Andromeda is a good game
>>
>>376562517
I didn't know DSP wrote reviews.
>>
>>376567153
This makes me really annoyed. I hate hipsters.
>>
>>376567205
wew
>>
>>376562517
Shills BTFO!!! Fucking crazy how awful this game looked yet people on this board were giving it praise. I will never listen to you limp dicks again.
>>
>>376567153

If the shit doesnt run well on my comp from the get go, its a fault of the developers and thus deserves a shit score. That pic very related. I want to play it so bad but it runs abysmally bad on pc even with mods
>>
>>376567219
NOOOOO THATS OUR MEME DON'T SAY THAT
>>
File: 1482193489231.gif (453KB, 255x144px) Image search: [Google]
1482193489231.gif
453KB, 255x144px
>>376567205
Nice 5 anon , not as good as my 3 tho
>>
File: God_Hand_vs_Party_Babyz.jpg (190KB, 1007x891px) Image search: [Google]
God_Hand_vs_Party_Babyz.jpg
190KB, 1007x891px
>>376562517
>IGN
>>
File: 1480472238238.jpg (70KB, 618x720px) Image search: [Google]
1480472238238.jpg
70KB, 618x720px
>>376567153
>Deadly Premonition PS3
>the most playable version
>>
>>376566276
It's good to know the fat fake gamer who liked THIEF also likes this.
>>
>i-it works on my machine!

Just accept that you got the worst version, and concede. You lost.
>>
>>376566986
>The Theory of Relative Savagery: 2nd Edition
>>
>>376567205
Can I get a 5?
>>
>>376566568
oh you
>>
File: fag.jpg (70KB, 1026x770px) Image search: [Google]
fag.jpg
70KB, 1026x770px
>>376567290
>>
>>376565396

Anon don't be retarded. Its IGN childishly trying to get back at Bethesda for chidishly not giving out review copies. Its pathetic.
>>
feels good to be a consolefag today

a literal unironic beta test. you can't make this shit up
>>
>>376564542
>>376564558
>>376564895
jeez
JEEZ
>>
Why is this one autist spamming about PC gayming when its a console port?
>>
Its funnt how 4 looks more like a tantrum and direct assault on the devs rather than an actual review score. IGN are fucking pathetic
>>
>>376567205
get in the fucking bag nebby
>>
>>376567447
that would make sense
>>
>>376567442
>going through the effort to prove a point when you could have easily answered his question/request
Holy tard wranglers batman, we got one on the loose.
>>
File: kek..jpg (20KB, 629x131px) Image search: [Google]
kek..jpg
20KB, 629x131px
>>
>>376567374
they probably never left the hotel when they played it
>>
>>376562517
eh I think they should have just said they can't fairly rate it yet because of game breaking bugs. I find it hard to believe this guy couldn't pick back up on xbone or ps4, unless its confirmed the bug was on those platforms too.
>>
>>376567153
MA/GG/Apedes flocked to IGN because theyre le based
>>
>>376567578
This guy sure means business.
>>
>>376563949
kek what an asspull.

Maxed out at 80fps consistent a week after launch on my 970.
>>
File: 14561985612561.jpg (71KB, 793x241px) Image search: [Google]
14561985612561.jpg
71KB, 793x241px
>>376562517
>nintendo game has a gamebreaking bug
>10/10
>true sequel to system shock has a gamebreaking bug
>4/10

Explain this.
>>
>>376567518
Only if this post is a 5 or up.
>>
>>376567635
>MA/GG/Apedes

what the fuck are you even saying

what is wrong with this board
>>
>>376567578
don't fuck with dan staple her to the floor and fuck her tons.
>>
>>376562517
and fired
>>
>>376562517
pretty much this>>376562565

>cant be bothered to clean and maintain PC
>cant be bothered to update or rollback drivers
>game must be broken
>gets paid to review PC games
>gives shit review.

I have completed the game on PS4 no probs. It has an issue with the controller deadzone drifting constantly. I reported it, they gave the usual automated response "power off PS4 reinstall game" bullshit etc. I replied, showed them links to others having the issue and youtube vids, they said devs are aware and working on it. all within a few hours.
Customer service for zenimax has always been pretty good from my experience with ESO at launch.

IGN are massive faggots anyway. Not that i'm shilling for the game or am a bethesda fanboy, but this game is a great game, well made and doesn't deserve that rating because some dumb fuck is PC illiterate.
>>
>>376562517
4 and we all get gfs (or bfs, whichever you prefer) by November
>>
>>376562517
Why did I fell for the build a pc meme...
>>
>>376567683
Is IGN seriously that much of a shill for nintendo? This is wack as fuck
>>
Can somebody who has a problem with the 4/10 explain what he should have given it?

WITHOUT saying
>They gave ___ a high score and it was buggy
>It'll be fixed in the future
>etc

No excuses. What's the actual right course of action here? Because I feel like if a game become fundamentally unplayable a 4/10 (which is one point below average) is more than fair.
>>
File: dick.png (49KB, 111x148px) Image search: [Google]
dick.png
49KB, 111x148px
>>376563141
yeah you're right dude. health inspectors shouldn't review a place if there are bugs in the kitchen either.

They should review the restaurant not a bug.
>>
>>376567683
what game breaking bug did skyward sword have?
>>
>>376567795
7 and no one in this thread gets a gf or bf until 2020.
>>
arkane is in this thread right now and htey are very mad because they are angry
>>
>>376567761
Doubt it. This jackass has fucked up many times before and IGN has bent over backwards to protect him. I'm guessing his position there is nepotism related because certainly not everyone at IGN is given this same treatment.
>>
>>376567885
He gave higher scores to the console versions. That's a joke.
>>
>>376567885
did he try to play it on another computer?
>>
>>376567979
Superior.
>>
>>376567894
Google is your friend, newfriend.
>>
So did Bethesda not send out review copies of the game? This is a serious baby-wailing-at-the-top-of-his-lungs-in-the-toy-section level tantrum.
>>
>>376567885
If it was on console I'd understand, but with PC it's inevitable that sometimes there are going to be hardware / software / driver etc issues that might impede some people. This has been the case for DECADES. PC Gamers are aware how difficult it is to get software to run the same on each pc given the immeasurable combination of OS, hardware, etc. When I read a review I'm reading a review to know if the game is worth my money. It not working on the reviewer's PC isn't relevant to me at all because it does fuckin happen sometimes with this platform.
>>
>>376563949
this is bullshit.
PC hardware is a fragile thing, if you are too retarded to maintain your PC and drivers for your own level of optimization you should just play on a console.
Just because a game has rec specs and you excede them does not mean it will run well unless you know what you are doing.
More simply than anything is when you are gaming to turn off every background process, including anti virus, and firewall.
though you are obviously too retarded to even comprehend this, so it's "the games fault"
>>
>>376568048
Bethesda stopped doing review copies last year
>>
>>376567979

If the console versions aren't broken then it's justified.

>>376567992
>>376568092

Straight from the review
>Due to repeated save game corruption
>even with assistance from the developer

What other course of action does he have?
>>
IGN gave me a 4 too
>>
>>376568092
A game having technical problems on PC should be reported as it always has, but the reviewer only experiencing the problem on one system and not repeating it on different systems to try to figure out what is causing the problem is unprofessional.
>>
>>376568189
did he try on another computer?
>>
>>376566412

niggers
>>
>>376567885
He experienced a bug that not everyone is experiencing and gave it a 4 out of anger. He never tried it on another PC and even though Arkane sent him working save files for where he was at before he didn't bother to keep playing. It's a vendetta score, pure and simple. Probably partly out of entitlement because they weren't given an early copy.


What he should have done is fucking wait for their patch which they have confirmed will be out in the next two days and then if it still kept happening then post the review score. Now the game has an unreasonably low review published from the biggest site for basically no reason.
>>
>>376566412

>>376568324

Niggers
>>
>>376568269
>>376568264
Anons, please. These people are failed english majors, not game enthusiasts.

They literally think people read their reviews because of their opinions and writing skills.
>>
>>376566412
should i smoke a bowl right now
>>
>>376568189
>What other course of action does he have?
Try it on another computer? I read the review, he doesn't troubleshoot at all or let me as a consumer know if this is a widespread issue that I can expect inevitably (like skyrim saves on PS3), or something unexpected that happened to him.
>>
>>376565070
>Having a deathclaw stuck in a wall is one thing, but corrupted saves making the game unplayable and wiping your progress shouldn't be tolerated and the score should reflect that.
bethesda game regularly have gamebreaking bugs (i.e. mainline quest scripts breaking).

sure. anyone with any sense rotates saves on a fucking bethesda game, but that doesnt excuse it

rating prey a 4 for this meme might be acceptable IFF they also demolished every fallout, every asscreed, dishonored 2, rome 2 etc.
>>
File: ign prey.png (40KB, 1054x145px) Image search: [Google]
ign prey.png
40KB, 1054x145px
https://youtu.be/1LIiB3ZCfGo
>>
File: Screenshot_20170423-010523.jpg (402KB, 1059x1134px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20170423-010523.jpg
402KB, 1059x1134px
>>376564895
Might as well reply.
>>
>>376568189
>8.5 on consoles
>reviewer experiences a bug on one system
>immediately blames the game
>no testing to find out what is causing the problem
>4.5 deduction

Professional video game journalism, everyone.
>>
File: 1422036607849.jpg (40KB, 640x350px) Image search: [Google]
1422036607849.jpg
40KB, 640x350px
>>376568416
>for all eternity
>>
>>376568438
>IFF
good man
>>
File: some_good_tea.png (384KB, 526x526px) Image search: [Google]
some_good_tea.png
384KB, 526x526px
>>376568416
>>
>>376568427
>I read the review
>or let me as a consumer know if this is a widespread issue that I can expect inevitably

Obviously you didn't

>This issue might not affect everybody (and as of now we’ve heard only rare reports of similar issues on consoles), but even though I like a lot of what Prey does when it works I can’t recommend that you take the chance.
>>
File: 1490746536680.jpg (61KB, 702x562px) Image search: [Google]
1490746536680.jpg
61KB, 702x562px
>>376562517
And remind me what score they gave Fallout 4.
>>
>taking over 30 hours to complete the game for a review

literal retards playing this shit now? Don't tell me this isn't some sour grapes trumped up bullshit
>>
>>376568416
Reap the devil's lettuce and your soul will sow the results.
>>
>>376567885
He should know how to make a vidya work on a PC
he should have tried different settings on his PC
Backed up his save
and above all not be a retard.
it's a fuck you review because he is a retard and pissed off because he couldn't figure out how to use a PC.

It's like saying windows 7 is broken because you, and only you, keep getting BSOD. the guy is just an idiot
>>
>>376568593
Thank you.
>>
>>376568438
>Different reviewer
>Might not have run into those bugs

This is what you guys that post GOD HAND vs. IMAGINE PARTY BABYZ never realize. Different reviewers have different criteria and experiences.

I never ran into a game breaking bug on a Fallout game so I wouldn't give it a shit review if I couldn't reproduce it.
>>
>>376568586
Anon maybe you have different standards than I do, but an asspull isn't the same as being investigative about it. "This might not affect everybody" doesn't fucking SAY anything and is clearly out of his ass as an aside.
>>
>>376568707
i wonder if anyone on this board has actually played imagine party babyz
>>
>>376568524

What's the adequate deduction?

>My game literally became unplayable no matter what I tried
>Better take off .5 that's fair

A game that DOESN'T WORK is below average plain and simple anon.
>>
>>376568593

iirc it was a 9.5
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (59KB, 652x225px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.jpg
59KB, 652x225px
>>376562517
wow, 83% to this
PCkeks on suicide watch
>>
>>376566412
Did the thicc girl from work want my D or not?
>>
>>376568781
>works on my machine

Explain >>376567683
>>
>>376568865
user score matters more than metascore these days anyway
>>
>>376568770
I have. it's actually pretty deep and complex gameplay wise.
>>
>>376568593
Remind me what score they gave BotW.

BTFO again, PCCuck
>>
>>376568770
Obviously not because they would realize its a superior game to god hand in every way
>>
>>376568895
>speaks in memes
>won't get laid
Nice.
>>
>>376568715

He talked to the devs and they couldn't help, noted that they've heard a few other reports but nothing concrete, says it happened to him multiple times and he couldn't finish the game. Says he still considers it a GREAT game it's just broken so he feels dishonest recommending it.

What do you honestly want from the guy? IGN fucking sucks but he did everything he could possible do.

The fact that he literally said it's a GREAT game but you might have a game breaking bug so it's up to you if you want to buy it is pretty damn responsible for vidya journalism.

You guys shat down IGN's throat for giving Andromeda DECENT scores when it was as buggy as it was.
>>
>>376568865
good bye bonuses
>>
File: itcrowd-moss-office.jpg (43KB, 570x300px) Image search: [Google]
itcrowd-moss-office.jpg
43KB, 570x300px
>>376568412
>These people are failed english majors, not game enthusiasts
pretty much this.
reading a review by these type of morons is just bullshit after bullshit stacks of useless vocabulary just so they can fill their quota of a certain amount of words in their reviews.
>>
>>376566412
Does she still think about me?
>>
WTF /v/ IS RIGHT AGAIN??!!

WHEN WILL WE STOP WINNING, BROS???
>>
>>376568897
>Review by Richard George
>>
>>376566412
Did she love me?
>>
>>376563141
And let a bunch of people buy the game not knowing about a bug this bad? They'll change the review after they fix the bug, they gave it the score it currently deserves.
>>
>>376562517
They'll give that next cod game a 9/10 GOTY, just watch. Especially after BF1's success
>>
>>376562517
b-but /v/ told me it was a good PC port
>>
File: 1429566935675.jpg (124KB, 600x801px) Image search: [Google]
1429566935675.jpg
124KB, 600x801px
>>376568968
I don't normally but she really matches the label of thicc.
She was super religious so it would never have worked anyway
>>
>>376562517
Nice change from IGN, i hope they remain like this and stop making excuses for bad games.
>>
>>376568924
>people actually believe this
retarded fanboys/haters are equally as bad as shit reviewers
user score and metascore are both equally irrelevant
>>
File: hjuhqxk[1].png (55KB, 797x981px) Image search: [Google]
hjuhqxk[1].png
55KB, 797x981px
CHECK my 4
>>
>>376562517
are they even allowed to give triple a games a score that low?

did the check bounce? is someone getting fired?
>>
>>376569172
>I don't normally but
That's how you're not going to get laid.
>>
>>376568707
an outlet is supposed to have internal consistency, regardless of their being different reviewers. that doesnt mean that they cant have their own opinions, but it does mean that different reviews should be comparable. there are plenty of games i dont personally like that i can still see the merit in. just because theyre not for me doesnt mean i should give a shit review, or vice versa

i also refuse to believe that anyone has played a fallout game for any length of time without having serious issues, ESPECIALLY on a review copy before the community patches are out
>>
>>376562517
Works on my machine :^).
>>
>>376569078
>no consistency between review criteria for scores

IGNorant shill
>>
>>376568924
User scores don't matter at all, everything is full of alt right SJWs raiding with 1s.
>>
File: ign gone home.png (95KB, 620x704px) Image search: [Google]
ign gone home.png
95KB, 620x704px
Looks like someone forgot to pay IGN their shill money.
>>
>>376569281
>>376569332

Reviews are opinion pieces. That's your fault for taking them as objective analysis. Outside of some core "does it work" everything is going to be subjective.

Honestly people like you are just as bad as IGN readers because all you care about is the number score.
>>
>>376569221
You mean this 4?
>>
>>376569384

Gone home is a good, legit game anon
>>
File: keno.jpg (2MB, 3200x2400px) Image search: [Google]
keno.jpg
2MB, 3200x2400px
>>376565098
nah, 6-7 is the sweet spot for secret kino

<5 has too many games which are just literally nonfunctional
>>
>THIS WAS LITERALLY PATCHED TODAY AND HE STILL POSTED IT

>Dan Stapleton

oh that explains it
>>
>>376569036
I watched some of the Joe Rogan podcast when they had that KindaFunny guy who got blasted by twitter and he was talking about how when he was the editor for IGN he would make 50000 word essays about politics to show how passionate he was about being a libertarian to post on the website.

Like holy fuck, how far up your own ass do you have to be before realizing how ridiculous you sound?
>>
>>376566412
will I ever get married?
>>
>>376567349
I never noticed how this image says God Hand gets "increbily boring" under Lasting Appeal.
>>
File: mXyupD1.gif (1MB, 288x198px) Image search: [Google]
mXyupD1.gif
1MB, 288x198px
>>376569408
>IGN reviews
>opinion pieces
>>
>>376569384
IGN wasn't paid off on that one, they're all just buddies with the devs because they're all part of the San Francisco SJW clique.
>>
File: tantrum.jpg (33KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
tantrum.jpg
33KB, 640x480px
>>376568048
>>
>>376566412

>>376568324
>>376568404

Nigger
>>
>>376569456
>>376569489
>literally
you don't know what that word means, shut up
>>
>>376562517
>IGN gave goat simulator a 8/10 but gave Alien Isolation a 5.9/10
>IGN gave Cod AW an 9.1/10 but gave a Doom 2016 a 7.1/10
D R O P P E D.
>>
>>376566412
Will I lose my virginity before I turn 28?
>>
>>376564730
>the number of results in a google search now counts as a source

/v/, you have really fallen far. I hope this cancer kills you. You don't deserve any chemo.
>>
File: 1488226638321.png (136KB, 223x330px) Image search: [Google]
1488226638321.png
136KB, 223x330px
>>376564895
wew
>>
only issue with the game is the abrupt ending and the powers are too OP even on nightmare

>not being able to run it over 100 fps average maxed out at 1440p with no bugs

why are they even playing video games?
>>
>>376569569

Are you implying they're not? Especially at clickbaity places like IGN. There's bias out the wazoo.
>>
>>376569652
I'm pretty sure he's just telling you to google it
>>
>>376564891
So weird they gave Fallout 4, Dishonored 2 and Pokemon X/Y high scores despite both have game breaking bugs/performance as well. Oh, I guess it only matters if the reviewer suddenly decides it matters. Huh. How strange.
>>
File: anime burger.jpg (60KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
anime burger.jpg
60KB, 1280x720px
>>376569569
>implying IGN posts are serious reviews that try to be as objective and fair as possible

I'm taking this bait because it's too delicious.
>>
>>376569621
i meant it in the literal sense (as in, there are many games released with consistent, reproducible crashes in normal gameplay scenarios, some of which are even completely unavoidable)

regardless,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai_VHZq_7eU
>>
File: Literally KYS.png (43KB, 561x514px) Image search: [Google]
Literally KYS.png
43KB, 561x514px
>>376569621
I think you don't know what the word means, but instead of being an asshole like you I will educate you friend.
>>
>>376569884
Ok. Post your review then.
>>
>>376563930
>"One bad review by IGN verifies my incorrect assumption therefore I'm not wrong"
You must be in a bad state if you're using IGN as a credible source.
>>
File: sm64.png (464KB, 1324x992px) Image search: [Google]
sm64.png
464KB, 1324x992px
>>376564542
>>376564558

N-NANI?!
>>
>>376569569
>>376569884

its not an opinion if the publisher paid you to say it
>>
>>376570087
Literal 0/10, doesn't even have a save feature.
>>
>>376565226
>Movie game
Is it even shitposting if you suck at it?
>>
>>376569838

More like it only matters if they actually run into it.

It really fucking sucks for Arkane that he DID run into it. But when you've got a bug that a reviewer is running into multiple times and when he contacts you about a fix you don't have anything for him...what do you expect?
>>
>>376566412
WILL I PUT PEEPEE IN VAJAYJAY SOON?
>>
>>376562517
Good

#NotMyPrey
>>
>>376562517

Whelp, so long IGN reviewer.

Don't piss off the major western video companies.
>>
File: normies.jpg (56KB, 887x730px) Image search: [Google]
normies.jpg
56KB, 887x730px
>peopl on this board actually care about ignpaidreviews.govt
>>
>>376566412
will i ever stop browsing 4chan and get my life together?
>>
>open and non linear level design
>meaningful RPG elements
>interactive environment
>mutiple ways to complete objectives
>great aesthetics

This game is literally System Shock 3. No wonder modern """reviewers""" are shitting on it, it's not an open world meme game or a SJW walking sim.
>>
File: 1494467229178.jpg (73KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]
1494467229178.jpg
73KB, 499x499px
This is what happens to little bitches who don't give us free review copies
>>
>>376569574
Gone Home is a nice story and a good "pick up everything not nailed to the ground and toss it around the room you're in" simulator.
>>
>a bug means the game is shit

That's not how reviews work. Even severe technical issues knock off 20% of the score at most. Stapleton wants clicks.
>>
>>376570587
meant for
>>376569440
>>
>>376566412
WILL IT HAPPEN?
>>
>>376566412
Should I do it?
>>
>>376569408
Wrong. If some one's kid dies the day they do a review, they can't say "1/10 - Didn't make me forget my dead kid."
>>
>>376564348
the bug was fixed before the review was published
>>
File: never forget.jpg (72KB, 373x281px) Image search: [Google]
never forget.jpg
72KB, 373x281px
>>376570438
>>
>>376566412
Will it work out?
>>
>>376564724
Sounds like a feature to stop you lard-asses sitting around having 10+ hour gaming sessions
>>
>>376570825

That has nothing to do with the game whatsoever. So your point isn't a point at all.

Opinion doesn't mean "my emotional state."

But just like there are people who fucking LOVE sandbox titles and will review them more positively there are others who find the lack of linearity leads to a lack of focus and a bunch of busy work. You have to do more to impress the latter person with a sandbox game.

/v/ adored Breath of the Wild. After being so tired of sandbox I felt like BotW did nothing new and didn't care for it.
>>
>>376570984
>>376566412
>>
>>376567885
>played 34 hours
>game is unplayable
pick one and only one
>>
File: 1430190120275-0.jpg (61KB, 514x549px) Image search: [Google]
1430190120275-0.jpg
61KB, 514x549px
>2017
>Still scoring games numerically.
>Still scoring games numerically without having an explicit and well-defined standard and uniform scoring system, that all reviewers on your website must abide by so that readers understand at a glance what a given score actually means.
>Having a scoring system that lists 7/10 as being "average" with anything lower than that being irredeemable trash.
>>
>>376569440
>game
>gone home
pick one because walking simulators and games are 2 different things
Unless you're a homo in which case no wonder you enjoyed it
>>
>ign gave it a bad review
guess i should buy it then
>>
>>376571124

So devs should be able to release games that just break as long as they can provide a good decent half?

Yeah, neck yourself.
>>
>>376566412
Is it time to dehumanize myself and face bloodshed?
>>
File: Fusion Core-Eating Bug.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
Fusion Core-Eating Bug.webm
2MB, 1280x720px
>>376564642
>>
>>376563273

>Not building a PC in the golden age of budget components

>$180 now can buy you $450 worth of graphics power just a couple of years ago

I hope to God you're 13 or just really broke and bitter because it's honestly just stupid to play on consoles in 2017 (outside of portables because those actually serve a purpose)
>>
>>376562517
HAHAHAHAAHAHA "it's the neww system shock" fags btfo
>>
>>376571376
>10/10 GOTYAY
>>
>>376562517
A rating based on a randomly occurring game breaking bug in an rpg is asinine. If that were the case, every Bethesda rpg game would be a 3.0 or worse.
>>
This has to be mainly to leverage their relationship with Bethesda. I have to imagine the gaming media at large is pissed with the lack of access to review copies in while being pressured to get content out as soon as possible. Makes sense that they would trash the game if it didn't work for them just because they could, not because it's a widespread issue.
>>
>>376562517
User review spam tier.

Unprofessional as fuck.
>>
prbly didnt PAY ign for a good review scores, like every other developer/game out there
>>
>>376571310
not only could you load a previous save, but the bug was already fixed, nice try dude
>>
File: (laughs).jpg (158KB, 478x463px) Image search: [Google]
(laughs).jpg
158KB, 478x463px
>>
>>376571376
jesus fuck that framerate and pixalation
lower the fucking resolution to 360 - 480 when making a webm or something.
>>
>>376571567

He said in the review it affected him multiple times across saves and that the devs had no fix for him at the time.
>>
We get a good immersive sim for the first time in YEARS and a bug makes it a 4/10.

JUST
FUCK
MY
INDUSTRY
UP
>>
File: .,,,,,.gif (2MB, 480x292px) Image search: [Google]
.,,,,,.gif
2MB, 480x292px
>People hated on Ass Creed Unity at launch for a fuck-butt load of bugs
>picked up game for $5 on PC
>shit ran at 60 fps and no bugs
>best Ass Creed because actual story and challenging gameplay that made me feel like an assin
>still one of the lowest rated Ass Creed games
Fucking game reviews are bullshit
>>
>>376571726
It will make your game a little harder to shill I suppose.
>>
File: 4chin.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
4chin.png
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>376565794
>>376562517
>>
>>376566412
does she love me?
>>
>>376566412
should I keep studying?
>>
>>376566031
Why would you want an even worse reviewer?
>>
What a douche. I know /v/ hates high review scores, but stupidly low scores like this are much worse. Especially for actually decent games like Prey, it's just a shitty thing to do.

>muh save file

Back up your saves retard. Darksiders 2 had serious save issues, but that's why you back that shit up.
>>
Given the fact this is one of the only recent major FPS games to come out that I enjoyed recently.

Doom is trash, as is Overwatch.
Immortal Redneck is too small scale, can't think of any others off the top of my head because they were forgettable.

This score is laughably incorrect, especially since they gave fallout 4 a 9.5 and BotW a 10. Prey is a solid 8 game on a proper 10 scale, so it's an easy 10 by IGN's standards.
>>
>>376571710

The patch was released before the review dropped.
>>
>>376566412
Rollan' for my question.
>>
>>376572539
Only in beta state though, not official.
>>
File: 1490193414884.jpg (85KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]
1490193414884.jpg
85KB, 960x720px
>>376562517
>...you’d think the ability to turn into any inanimate object, such as literal pieces of trash like banana peels or bio-waste bags, would let you play hilarious pranks on enemies and get funny reactions. But none of these creatures – including the rare humans you come across – react any differently to a strangely placed chair than they do to a valuable item. You’re either ignored completely or discovered and attacked without a word (because the aliens don’t talk), so it feels like I’m telling a joke that nobody’s around to hear.

Jesus Christ Bethesda.
>>
>Bethesda says fucking game critics we're releasing Prey without Review Codes
>IGN BOMBS THE GAME

Are we really going to pretend this shit wasn't personal politics? I feel this is going to be an infamous review.
>>
>>376562517
I told them to pay the reviewers, fucking idiots.
>>
>>376567442
As if anyone is retarded enough to go to an IGN site just to read the comment section. Oh wait, you did.
>>
I've watched some videos with Dan Stapleton. he seems like a twat.
>>
>>376566569

A more appropriate response has never been spoken.
>>
File: 1456713183222.jpg (45KB, 299x453px) Image search: [Google]
1456713183222.jpg
45KB, 299x453px
>>376564542
>>376564558
Witnessed
>>
>>376563057
>>W-WORKS ON MY MACHINE!
That is, was, and always will be a 100% valid argument.

Prey still sucks though.
>>
>>376572714
Imagine being so retarded that you think Bethesda developed this game
>>
>>376564119
>Fix ends up just having the game make multiple auto-saves in the offchance the most recent save gets fucked
>>
>>376564542
>>376564558

ONE OF THESE SPONGEBOBS IS NOT REAL!

ALIEN MIMICS ARE IN THIS THREAD!
>>
>>376572714
because it's a mobility and offensive skill not a sick prank on npcs.
>>
>>376571754
Oh yeah, I forgot to play it just after its Play Date, not when it's actually released! My bad, anon. You are totally right!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdbyYNG_kgI
>>
>>376566412
Will I get some ass tonight?
>>
>>376568989
You uh, seem pretty passionate about a reviewer site that has been shown time and time again to be awful and incompetent. Sure you don't have some kind of vested interest there buddy?
>>
>>376566412
Am I going to die a virgin?
>>
File: 1477107767907.jpg (85KB, 824x579px) Image search: [Google]
1477107767907.jpg
85KB, 824x579px
>Same guy gave Fallout 4 a 9.5/10
as if I needed more proof that Reviewers are fucking worthless human beings
>>
>>376566412
>>376573404
Askan again
>>
>>376573428
Only IGN and other huge review sites.
>>
>>376566412
>>376573404
>>376573474
ASKAN AGAIN!
>>
>>376573428
Fallout 4 was fantastic though, but I'm sure if they had encountered a game breaking bug that destroyed hours of progress they'd have given it a low score as well.
>>
>>376573340
>I'll see you soon
W-what did he mean?
>>
What is the bug?
>>
File: 1475629800421.jpg (563KB, 1500x1714px) Image search: [Google]
1475629800421.jpg
563KB, 1500x1714px
>>376573573
>>
A big fat 8 for you boys who enjoy not enjoying but enjoy things anyway. Just look at it. The 8
>>
>>376569621
>Getting this mad over literally nothing
>>
File: oh baby.gif (2MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]
oh baby.gif
2MB, 400x225px
>>376564542
>>376564558
>>
This is a good thing. I wish more acclaimed games got bad scores. For example, 4 is exactly what FFXV should have received.
>>
>>376566412
Will i randomly find a dildo tomorrow with which I can fuck my ass?
>>
>>376573583
Someone's getting some ass tonight whether they like it or not.
>>
>>376572636
Still fixed the problem. Which the reviewer could have found out with this cool new thing called a "search engine". You know, do what people who actually play games do all the time before whining about it online.
What point are you even trying to make anymore?
>>
>>376563203
Todd never fixes bugs thats the difference
>>
>>376563210
Considering the reviewer wrote an article condemning Bethesda for their policies I wouldn't be shocked.
>>
>>376573971
Good, fuck Bethesda
>>
File: 1494025196014.jpg (14KB, 238x188px) Image search: [Google]
1494025196014.jpg
14KB, 238x188px
>>376566412
Will I make friend?
>>
File: 1489442196130.png (308KB, 500x420px) Image search: [Google]
1489442196130.png
308KB, 500x420px
>>376573809

>That eyebrow raise at the end.

>>376573858

Prey wasn't even acclaimed.
>>
>>376573907
Not even the guy you were arguing with, just pointing that out.
>>
>>376562753
bethesda is next
buggy trash
>>
File: 1456377947529.jpg (220KB, 1000x1412px) Image search: [Google]
1456377947529.jpg
220KB, 1000x1412px
>>376565662

Korwa from Granblue Fantasy
>>
>>376566412
Will I marry a cute older boy in the next year?
>>
>game breaking bug on AAA title
>cutting/ignoring the QA department

Fuck em 4.0 is right if not generous
>>
File: Pure maiden.gif (3MB, 500x294px) Image search: [Google]
Pure maiden.gif
3MB, 500x294px
>>376574546
Sexualizing pure shrine maidens is immoral anon
>>
File: bethesda.png (54KB, 596x815px) Image search: [Google]
bethesda.png
54KB, 596x815px
>>376564642
Daggerfall may be one of the buggiest professionally published games of all time. On day one you could barely play for 10 minutes without encountering some crash, game-breaking, or simply quest-breaking bug. Even when fully patched about a quarter of the game's quests are broken in some way, ranging from minor or rare bugs to consistent crashes and impossible to complete situations. Even the main quest, despite being patched multiple times, still can be easily broken if you do certain quests in the "wrong" order or experience save corruption. Fortunately there are several unofficial patches that fix many of those problems.

As for the many OFFICIAL patches, here are some gems from the notes:
>You will no longer start the game with negative spell points after you created your character. The problem with the negative hit points still exists however.
>A dungeon block was found to not have put an exit next to where you entered. This has been fixed.
(Before that patch it was possible to enter dungeons with no exit whatsoever, making it impossible to leave unless you had a teleportation anchor set outside of it.)
>Illegally bashing down doors no longer gives you a revered legal reputation when you are caught
>Malacath's quest no longer causes the game to lock up.
>The Old Ways Book no longer crashes the game.
>Clicking on Medora will no longer crash the game with error 115.
>Clicking on the shelves in the Mages Guild and then bringing up your spell book no longer locks the game up.
>The bug where instead of having to pay money to summon Daedra, you get paid money has been fixed. You will no longer get paid to do this.
>Witches will no longer try to give inappropriate quests that will crash the game.
>Sleeping on a ship or in your own house no longer summons the city guards.
>Going into your inventory when you have left items in the tavern no longer crashes your game.

And my personal favorite:
>The skeleton no longer walks backwards.
>>
>>376566412
When will the Sonic Totem die?
>>
File: 1493390218939.png (655KB, 1191x578px) Image search: [Google]
1493390218939.png
655KB, 1191x578px
>>376566412
will injustice 2 be the GOAT fightan game?
>>
>>376572908
See >>376575035
>>
>>376563436
it's an issue with the PC port in itself because the reviewer still said his file got corrupted even when Arkane gave him a save file that was at the point before his issues started happening.
>>
>>376575035
>never
kekd
>>
>>376564818
Yes. Oblivion had it even worse. Bethesda games on PS3 were disasters.
>>
If 5 everyone in the thread dies
>>
File: 1484628391168.gif (686KB, 356x275px) Image search: [Google]
1484628391168.gif
686KB, 356x275px
>>376566412
does she know I like her?
>>
File: Screenshot_1.png (23KB, 100x79px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_1.png
23KB, 100x79px
>>376566868
Im loving these nepnep pics dude where did you get them?
>>
>>376572714
>their only criticism
ITS JUST A PRANK BRO
>>
I'd be fucking pissed too if I lost 30 hours of progression.
>>
File: dvd.netflix.com 70004961.jpg (42KB, 284x405px) Image search: [Google]
dvd.netflix.com 70004961.jpg
42KB, 284x405px
>>376568924
>alt right SJW
>>
File: mfw this sucks.gif (1MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]
mfw this sucks.gif
1MB, 400x225px
>>376566412
Should I Buy a 2ds??
>>
>>376567683
>a glitch you have to go out of your way to do
>vs.
>a glitch that can happen at any time, during any point of the game, at random.

dumb anonposter.
Thread posts: 514
Thread images: 132


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.