http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests /reactiontime

23 years old and 401ms with my highest being 385.

>>376430313
311average 28years old
188 lowest

292 avg, 252 lowest
18 y/o

25 Years old,

Average is 387ms highest 410ms.

Whas wrong with the rest of you sloths.

25yo 170ms avg

144hz low latency monitor and shit

Average 389 age 26.
I did it on mobile phone and I drink heavily so...

>>376430313
24
253 average

I'm shit

24, 300ms avg

File: 790731ed.jpg (47KB, 874x507px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 874x507px

29 yo
60hz monitor
what's wrong with you, fags. 300 is average

File: Cattura.png (9KB, 1093x126px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 1093x126px

>>376430313
>http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

i did 206 average , i'm 24

File: fadsfaefeaf.gif (890KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

890KB, 500x281px

>>376430313
27 years old
222ms average

Seems okay I guess.

>>376430313
20y/o
don't know why my memory is so good,

File: 1489991582673.png (301KB, 434x391px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 434x391px

>>376430313
28 y/o
191 lowest, 219 average
And I haven't even had any bulletproof coffee yet, but I want to say twitch shooters are why I can do this.

File: fuck.png (40KB, 1371x840px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1371x840px

60hz 5ms monitor

I used to get under 230 easily last year, and I refuse to believe changing monitors and aging a little bit did this to me.

File: scuym.png (25KB, 687x234px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 687x234px

>>376434069
heck

File: get fucked.png (17KB, 728x448px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 728x448px

29 years old
almost 3 am

251 avg
Also got to level 12 on the memory test.

>>376434076
too high for
>twitch shooters

237ms, 79 percentile shitty laptop, didn't have coffee all day

I had worse results percentile-wise in a more reliable test than was normalized on a population of all ages

your results are likely overestimated

File: first attempt.png (24KB, 1106x504px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 1106x504px

Is there a test for the thumb? (A button on a pad)

I think my thumb is faster than my pointing finger

30yo
204 average

Up yours, children.

>>376434687
Can you not put your thumb on your mouse?

>>376434796
287
the position is not optimal though

File: 6wUsVA2.png (31KB, 1101x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 1101x500px

Ended up doing 23 because it's fun

24 yo, 60hz monitor, 18.5cm dick, 1,91m tall, extremely depressed, had grilled chicken breast and rice for lunch, listening to shadowrun music

>>376434553
And yet it's lower than most of the people in this thread, a number of which are younger than me.
>doesn't know about twitch gameplay (tip: wiki it)

File: 1487765991905.jpg (21KB, 724x428px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 724x428px

I'm 24, im getting too old these days. fucking kill me bros

>>376434146
i get 180ms on my desktop (60hz, g402s, wlan) and 280ms on my laptop which is right next to it (thinkpad)

>>376434862
It really goes down with various attempts
Don't feel special
You are a retard fooling yourself
All the <200 were all lucky timed clicks

>>376430313
25, extreme vision problems
286 average
143 best

>>376434862
>listening to shadowrun music
nice, dude

File: 1491777069049.png (1MB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x900px

>>376434974
>t. slowfag

>You scored 288.0. You're currently in the top 43 percentile for this test!

Is this good?

21 here, cant seem to get faster than 230

>>376430313
>right hand average 293
>left hand average 276

>>376434974
Horseshit, m8. I can consistently get sub 200 easy, and if I grind away at it for the next half hour I can get 170 average at least.

>>376435089
You're better then half of everyone else but not as good as the other half

File: eh.png (49KB, 1125x498px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1125x498px

Yo

File: I can go faster.png (16KB, 729x450px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 729x450px

>>376435238
Pic related

>>376430313
23 years old.
Fastest time is 196, Average is 249

>people always overestimate their penis size even though the average is factually online
>people always overestimate their height even though the average is online
>same thing is happening here

why do guys feel the need to lie and make up bigger numbers ?

File: igUbLY1.png (17KB, 728x449px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 728x449px

Not bad for 29.

File: reaction.jpg (166KB, 1070x451px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1070x451px

Usually it's more like 160 when I do this, and there are times when I space out and see the light change but can't click for whatever reason and it's more like 200+

>giving stats for free for someone's homework

Good job sheeple.

>>376435579
I won't lose sleep over it, will you?

>>376434974
Each one is timed with rng. There's very little possibility of getting a "lucky click" if anything it's you becoming acclimated to the act to gradually increase your reflexes for a short burst of time

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a178485.pdf "Visual Acuity and Reaction Time in Navy Fighter Pilots"

>Simple reaction times ranged from 143 to 461 msec, with a mean of 223 msec (SD = 0.055).

>>376435579
the site already has a stats page

26, 244 average. I did another one where I put it on my second monitor which sits at the edge of my peripheral vision and averaged 40 higher. Was kinda neat.

I don't like getting older

>>376430313
>breddy stoned
Average 269
High 335

File: download_20170320_062022.jpg (8KB, 218x231px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 218x231px

>>376430313
378 avg 25yo

>>376434069
Memorizing things is a trained skill. You're on /v/ so I assume you play video games. Video games test and "work out" your memory,

>>376435579
>I had fun once, it was awful

I can't even call you Reddit. You're just retarded.

>>376435553
>240hz

What a placebo.

30yo
197 avg, 168 lowest, 219 highest

dude, variance, lmao

File: int_vs_dex.png (27KB, 692x204px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 692x204px

>tfw 29 and the body is failing

>>376435459
>why do guys feel the need to lie and make up bigger numbers
Except lower's better retard.

File: Untitled.png (12KB, 733x450px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 733x450px

>>376435553
Just got the lowest non-guess result I've gotten

File: file.png (30KB, 652x396px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 652x396px

Tired 33 y/o, not bad.

25
299 avg

>>376430313
age 24, 309ms avg

This test is literal shit, it even says in the fine-print your hardware configuration can add up to 200ms.

233 average
28 years old

>>376430313
25
387 Highest
300 Lowest
340 Average

>>376436150
Ping also plays a factor.

File: Untitled.png (24KB, 358x441px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 358x441px

fastanons, let's work together to fill the scoreboard
we can't beat the 100ms bot cheaters but the lower ones are possible if you're young and have good peripherals

This is the thing I hate about tests like this, always faggots trying to cheat the system to try and lie about how "superior" they are. What a bunch of party poopers

>>376436257
just download autohotkey and write a shitty pixel scanner. it looks like humanbenchmark has a cutoff at 100ms anyways.

File: Human Benchmark - User - Guest user.jpg (23KB, 655x88px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 655x88px

>>376430313

File: sanic.gif (60KB, 466x367px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 466x367px

>>376436473
>not training until you can beat the cheaters without resorting to cheating yourself
it's like you're not an anime protagonist

File: 5a3ad4ede85a17c986ab314e69b2ee85.png (26KB, 738x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 738x300px

Man, reaction speed is my worst one.

File: Human Benchmark - User - Guest user.jpg (25KB, 728x85px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 728x85px

>>376436710
Second try

>300ms
am I the king of reactionlets?

>>376436908
fuck, anon that's good

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-09 at 3.02.21 PM.png (15KB, 182x237px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 182x237px

25

File: Capture.png (30KB, 769x331px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 769x331px

>>376430313
I scored almost 200 on the Verbal portion of the IQ test, so this isn't a shocker. Shame my non-verbal IQ was 130.

Lowest I got was 227. what am I doing wrong?

File: capture.png (25KB, 728x449px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 728x449px

20 y/o

>>376430313
avg 280
23 yo

File: Human Benchmark - User - Guest user.jpg (63KB, 725x297px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 725x297px

>>376436710
>>376436908
So what's the point of this?

>>376437425
what the fuck? that's 30ms better than me and I'm 19. I need to git gud

>>376434974
its not unreasonable that there might be bots for this type of thing as well, whenever highscores are involved retards will try to cheat i

File: benchmark.png (55KB, 1141x491px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1141x491px

Not bad considering i'm visually impaired.

>>376435808
yeah but reactions are a trained skill and I'm young, I should be better than top 60% by your logic

302ms @ 32

18 y/o
280 average
48 lowest

>tfw 30 yrs old

Though I guess it doesn't help I'm using a $10 wireless mouse

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-09 at 3.12.18 PM.png (39KB, 723x448px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 723x448px

3/4 yo

File: Untitled.png (3KB, 261x79px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 261x79px

>>376437864
Forgot pic

File: Untitled.png (60KB, 738x763px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 738x763px

one of the two I got wrong in the verbal memory test was a misclick

this makes sense, when I was in school I was literally retarded-level with math but scored in top 0.001% margin on every test related to words/vocab/reading

>>376437864
I think you're right. I can't get below 220 average and I'm using a wireless mouse.

File: Screenshot_49.png (28KB, 735x305px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 735x305px

19 yo
shit

>>376438071
oh, and 21 years old by the way

>>376438071
holy shit your visual memory is absolute garbage mate. How do you remember where you keep your keys?

File: human benchmark.png (21KB, 742x278px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 742x278px

23 yo

Just Got 185 average.
19yo
wireless mouse

beat that with a wireless mouse, plebs

>>376438225
i think i actually am genuinely retarded in some areas. whenever i am reading a book and there's a description of a spacial area, i actually am incapable of understanding it. i read the takeshi kovacs books the other day and i had to just start skipping every section where he described an area geographically because i would have to reread a sentence ten times to get any kind of a picture of it in my head, and it would leak out right after

on the other hand, i can still remember notable word choices that seemed satisfying and well-placed to me, in all three books, and what page they were on

29 yo, 351.0 avg

>>376430313
Anyone has the APM game?

File: playingtoomuchfps.jpg (22KB, 722x440px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 722x440px

I'm pretty good at fps

27 y/o

File: image:46159.png (32KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x800px

Get on my level scrubs

>>376430313
339 I'm a brainlet.

>>376438558
might want to stick to the LMG

File: old man.jpg (32KB, 689x227px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 689x227px

>>376437746
Got slower on full test.

>>376430313
205 average

I am above average at FPS games.

>>376438815
you sug

File: caoture.png (24KB, 714x284px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 714x284px

20 years old. Always knew my verbal and visual were weaker.

File: reactiontime_age35.png (11KB, 731x445px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 731x445px

>>376430313
35 years old but i played ut-2k4 for years mid-high so that helps i guess

>>376438815
185 average. Git gud or git fragged, pleb

File: reactiontime.png (18KB, 718x438px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 718x438px

24. 300ms average.

I'm above average!

>>376437612
I started getting into FPS game a lot in the past year, so that probably has a lot to do with it.

>>376439361
t-this isn't over! I'll git gud and then you'll see!

>>376430313
260 average, 222 lowest. 21 with wireless mouse, so it might realistically be a bit better than that.

has anyone been getting the same result in the reaction test over and over? i've gotten 163ms so many times i restarted my browser to see if it was a bug. at the start there were lower and higher ones, now only 163

20
350 average

I'm MVP in 95% of all multiplayer matches but my reaction times are pretty lacking at times. Map knowledge and other skills help a lot.

I'm 20.
>You scored 294.0. You're currently in the top 40 percentile for this test!

>avg 325

Calling bullshit on this lads

29, almost 30.

~225 ms average ~20 tries

File: 17498691_276209756161059_9137671248405333353_n.jpg (5KB, 300x162px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 300x162px

>>376430313
>first one was 16ms
>second one was 260ms
>third was 180ms
>fourth was 140ms
>fifth was 150ms
>somehow get an average of 270
What

File: reactiontimev2.png (9KB, 726x447px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 726x447px

35 years old second attempt 199 average
Dude is right if you only look at it from your peripheral vision you react faster like a flick rail lel

File: kinda slow.webm (928KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 800x600px

>>376430313
Here's mine.

Some anon was going full retard and telling me that the reaction times don't count if you click too soon, so I made a vid trying to go flawless. Ended up managing 8 tries before I accidentally clicked too early.

>>376440279
put it on the scoreboard

284 average

Maybe this is why I'm so shit at fighting games...

File: first try.png (27KB, 807x326px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 807x326px

>tfw mistyped

>>376440279
157ms average, on a bad day, that is.
24 years old.

fastest 216

Average after 20, or so clicks 244

26

semi drunk 20
305

21 years old
231 average
I think lowest was 227.
Not too shabby.

File: 24WJuQ2.png (29KB, 1065x474px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1065x474px

>>376437647
slowcucks get out

guys i think im retarded

i scored 30% for all this shit

File: 30 tries, no early starts.jpg (477KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 2560x1440px

>>376440401
I did, but it doesn't count since the scoreboard is filled with people with 100ms 'reaction times'.

I did the video about a month ago, I've got another one averaged from 30 tries. Basically did the same things as the vid, tried to go flawless and click only after it went green. Ended up losing concentration and getting a few 250ms, really fucked my average up.

>>376440845
>hal 9000
you're that autist who posts the quake webms? i'm the autist who posts the quake and overwatch webms

looks like both our bodies contain high concentrations of sanics

File: 1434467209021.jpg (65KB, 600x573px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x573px

>>376440808

>>376440973
Nah, I'm a cs player. I got gud playing surf and awping people going 1,000,000kmh out of mid-air

File: 1492577833626.png (30KB, 726x451px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 726x451px

>>376430313
<1 frame on the last attempt.

>>376440808
27 yo here. I did well on reaction time and verbal memory and absolutely terrible on remembering numbers and visuals.

File: asdfasdfssssaaaa.png (27KB, 709x232px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 709x232px

>28 yo
misclicked once in verbal memory. i expected numbers to be easier...

File: oldjak.png (87KB, 714x810px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 714x810px

This thread is ageist... or... something.

File: legaymer.jpg (62KB, 1088x671px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1088x671px

I'm 21. I always get 170-180ms. 60Hz monitor. I suck at competitive fps games.

>>376430313
28 with 390!ms average and scored 382 on last try

38 years old and 235ms.
Suck it faggots.

238ms
25y

Thats ok i guess

File: 1408591004019.jpg (6KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x200px

>tfw can't get above 50% in reaction time
w-why am i so average...

>>376430313

28, 224ms

>>376441889
You're probably doing it wrong. Don't just sit there and wait for green.
You have to be highly strung and ready to click at a moments notice. Tense up, sit close to the screen, have your finger on the button ready to click the very picosecond you see green.

>>376430313
Wtf I used to be 230 average 3 months ago and now I can't get lower than 290
wtf is this shit

>>376442605
nice verbal memory!

File: time.png (13KB, 692x302px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 692x302px

c a r a m b a

File: 1474069423983.jpg (65KB, 322x301px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 322x301px

>>376430313
40yo, 217ms

File: testresults.png (30KB, 751x311px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 751x311px

>>376442735
Thanks, I still have an old result saved where I did even better!

Why does good number memory seem to be a lot less common than good verbal memory?

File: aah.jpg (30KB, 811x763px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 811x763px

28, 285ms, 100Hz monitor
currently have a terrible migraine and a stiff neck and i want to die

>226ms

are these guys with 300+ms for real?

how the fuck are you so slow?

too much pot?

File: 99d7545acc418e744b735bef5a77ac9c.png (7KB, 753x107px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 753x107px

>>376430313
23 years old

>>376443483
Pot doesn't change reaction time.

Alcohol does

Pot just effects focus.

>>376443045
brainlets

File: chrisMcChan.jpg (11KB, 331x324px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 331x324px

216 at 19, thats not too bad.

>>376444070
kinda is

10 digits, 228.0, 116 points and 27808 respectively. I'm 18.

File: Unbenannt.png (14KB, 704x288px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 704x288px

>>376442605
Friends?

File: time.jpg (51KB, 795x571px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 795x571px

27 years old

drink a pint of milk a day

sleep 2 hours a night

mostly play rust

File: smthn.png (12KB, 724x298px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 724x298px

21 years old feeling like I'm 80 now.

pro tip: count to 4 and click

>>376444070
i'm 25 and got 208

File: file.png (25KB, 729x299px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 729x299px

fuck average

27 old
You scored 226.0. You're currently in the top 85 percentile for this test!

Not bad I think

>>376430313
>have 60hz monitor
>get avg 180ms
>have 144hz monitor
>get avg 100ms


pay2win test desu lads

File: ss+(2017-05-09+at+02.38.57).png (5KB, 176x237px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 176x237px

24 years old.

>>376444238
>Unbennant.png
Freunde!

>>376430313
21 years old, average 244ms, although I didn't slept well those last two days.

File: click.jpg (15KB, 283x251px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 283x251px

27
white
male

>>376430313
27, turning 28
ave: 203
min: 83

You're never too old boys. Never give up!

>be as fast as possible
>300+
>be slower than normal
>299-

Fuck this tablet's processing power and screen

>>376442249
Stop playing slow ass vidya all the time.

224ms average 19 years old

File: Notbad.png (26KB, 696x281px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 696x281px

Yo

File: 1479345195473.png (5KB, 171x212px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 171x212px

>>376430313
22, 198ms

File: 1440169940146.jpg (55KB, 650x820px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 650x820px

>>376430313
Now for sound.

http://playback.fm/audio-reaction-time/

>>376446141
>18 digits
Bullshit

I scored 39th percentile in reaction time and 99th in verbal memory. Guess that explains why I was born a nerd, not a jock.

342ms
24y/o

On my phone, kek

File: 20170509_165534.png (65KB, 1100x459px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1100x459px

>>376446356
18 and my reflexes are shit.

>>376446391
Play Brain Concentration Training on 3DS

File: www.jpg (31KB, 756x328px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 756x328px

> 33yo (why im i still here)

disappointed by my number memory but really wasnt expecting the verbal one to be that high

>>376446578
Fuck I meant to reply to OP.

File: games.png (18KB, 745x281px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 745x281px

did better on my last reaction time but forgot to save

19 years old

why the fuck is everyone putting their age
is this some new age shill thread

File: 1483131820145.jpg (45KB, 681x438px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 681x438px

WHY are y'all so bad with numbers?

>>376446798
it's interesting to see if there is a general pattern, even though the number of tests is too low for some kind of conclusionl.

>>376446920
homosapiens are bad with numbers

28

Average 307
Best 297

File: gotta go fast.png (30KB, 696x271px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 696x271px

I still pretty much like turn-based games better. Going overdrive like this is very stressful. 30 year old btw.

24

238 ms average. Honestly a lot of this probably has to do with what monitor you have

>>376447381
Yeah yeah sure thing reflectionlet.

>>376440279
>Ended up managing 8 tries before I accidentally clicked too early.

Thanks for reminding me that nobody on here does this even only halfway legit

>>376434903
twitch shooters are casual shooters though
they require significantly less reaction time because of the low TTK meaning the fight is over quickly

high TTK in non-twitch shooters require, ironically, a higher level of reaction time so you can track target and respond to them moving, while moving yourself

File: 27.png (25KB, 695x251px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 695x251px

27 yo

>tfw you can't remember numbers for shit but you are good with math and you work as an engineer

Even phone numbers fuck me up. It took forever for me to learn my own. Any tips on how to remember numbers?

>>376430313
36 and 250ms on my first try.

>>376447835
There are none you just gotta not be retarded.

>>376432438
Higher is not better, anon.

>>376447910
I guess I will just keep writing down numbers then

File: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.png (28KB, 792x354px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 792x354px

I literally haven't completed a book in 5 years.

>>376448174
What vidya you play anon? Looks like a lot of RPGs to me.

>>376448174
>that verbal
Wow impressive
>that visual
Jesus fuck talk about below avarage.

I guess your other two are okay.

>>376448413
Dude I don't know how high those are if you don't have the yellow bars. Take a screenshot.

Visual memory test is bogus btw. Your score relies on the combo heavily and if you make an honest misclick in the early-mid rounds your score will drop by up to 20k assuming you're going to make far. Same thing if particularly complex pattern screws you over at just the right time. With multiple attempts my lowest score is 18k and highest 58k.

File: smrt.jpg (30KB, 741x320px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 741x320px

who /retard/ here?

>>376430313
25 yo, 250 avg, 225 lowest

>>376430313
>~250
31 yo
I used to do 230 a few years back.

>>376432438

Apparently 25 years old and retarded. No surprise there.

>>376432582
The age factor is largely pointless as reaction time is something that can be trained. 30 year old navy seals have a much better reaction time than 18 year old army grunts. There's exercises you can do to keep it and improve.

Obviously at some point it becomes a factor, but not when you're, gasp, 23.

>>376430313
25 years old, these were my first 5 results:
>295ms
>343ms
>279ms
>284ms
>300ms

Not bad I guess?

>>376430313
Avg a 264 and I just turned 30 last month.

i call bullshit on all the faggots that got under 150, wish this shit kept track of real tries not only succesful ones, bet you guessed 50 times per try to get the lowest average

>You scored 198.0. You're currently in the top 95 percentile for this test!

27 years old.

>>376450408
Pretty bad desu

File: kännsbramannen.jpg (55KB, 330x357px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 330x357px

190ms average over 10 tries.

File: 1493562671833.jpg (295KB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 960x1440px

>>376430313
>foreskinchanisgoodgoyims

File: rt.png (6KB, 168x214px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 168x214px

Top 1%, motherfuckers.

File: Capture.png (19KB, 724x442px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 724x442px

27 years old.

File: 1492562656805.jpg (335KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 2048x1536px

>>376430313
average 238...36 years old

File: firefox_2017-05-09_14-56-19.png (14KB, 824x345px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 824x345px

22
216
75 hz monitor (it's really fucking old)

I'm really average at video games

File: ss+(2017-05-09+at+10.59.16).png (46KB, 1058x381px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1058x381px

i dont play or particularly like fps games

26
259 average

>>376451769
I wonder how much more lenient games have become due to how much laggier hardware is now

I am so profoundly unhappy and alone I start to thinl it's hopeless

File: Untitled.png (18KB, 763x477px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 763x477px

24
60hz

>>376452703
NEVER GIVE UP

File: 1351361387242.jpg (118KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 600x600px

>>376430313
>28 years old
>220 ms
>its midnight and im tired as fuck after day at work.
>Wireless mouse

Meh, could be better, I remember doing one of these with sheep, was averaging 150ms.

>>376450165

What exercises increase your reaction time? Sounds like lies.

>>376430313
I can get down to 180 average but I'm inconsistent. That's always been my fucking problem in literally every single game. Actually my whole life is inconsistent

File: Capture.png (27KB, 801x627px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 801x627px

Adderall is dope.

>>376433501
200 is average my man.
With enough training you can probably get down to 190

>>376453213
It's all hopeless isn't it?

File: reaction.png (37KB, 1077x498px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1077x498px

21

144ms 1ms monitor

>>376453079
Batting machines

>>376453253
lol at counting pre clicking

cheating faggot

>>376447665
Fuck you slowass. Get good at shootan fast.

>>376444608
nah you're just genetic trash

t. >>376453356

File: 1492818317828.jpg (801KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

801KB, 1462x1462px

>>376447835
>engineers
>good with math

File: 1433008476508.jpg (57KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1280x720px

>>376451261
>Rika

>>376430313
>303ms
I should play fps again i'm getting rusty as fuck.

File: ack.png (20KB, 738x304px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 738x304px

My reactions are shit

what

File: dynamic smoke emitter.jpg (36KB, 336x393px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 336x393px

These times are not accurate. Your computer can easily add more than 40ms

144hz vs 60 screen will lower you average score by 8ms
1000hz vs 125 polling mouse is also about 8 ms
Your web browser can add a full frame (16ms) of lag
The travel and resistance of your mouse button can easily add 10ms

>>376430313
270 reaction time avg. Fastest 230. 29, 50Hrz shit tier TV monitor.

File: Untitled.png (18KB, 767x310px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 767x310px

apparently my visual memory isn't very good... that was my score on the second try though everything else was on the first try. 23/yo

File: benchmarking.png (22KB, 672x221px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 672x221px

good thing i only flip hamburgers

You should also note that men have faster times than women in these tests, as proven by female only gaming leagues in esports.

>>376447835
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlCRfTmBSGs

What is verbal memory even useful for?

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-09 at 5.59.44 PM.jpg (92KB, 1599x646px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1599x646px

What is this newfound power of mine useful for?
Given that I'm shit at reactions (laptop trackpad) that are useful for vidya, I want to believe this can be useful. Somehow.

>>376430313
20 yrs old
279 average

>>376430313
256av
33yo

File: it's shit.png (29KB, 765x322px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 765x322px

no retries

>>376430313
>avg 303

Is that bad

>>376430313
26 years old
218ms average
190ms lowest
Pretty good I guess.

File: 2017-05-09 17_27_26-Human Benchmark - Reaction Time Test.jpg (316KB, 1664x994px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1664x994px

>>376430313

File: 1494370504109.png (45KB, 475x411px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 475x411px

These threads piss me off because I generally see them on my Laptop and touchpads are shite

>>376459440
osumania or regular osu? fight me

>>376459450
a touchpad really doesn't affect how fast you can click a box that doesn't move though

>>376459820
It's what I tell myself so I can sleep at night anon, don't ruin this for me

>>376459721
I played Standard and CtB. Before osu! I played stepmania but never osu!mania

>>376460015
uh- i mean- at least on my laptop which has a weird nanotechnologic touchpad so it probably doesn't count for you

i got your back

File: 2017-05-09 17_37_47-Human Benchmark - Reaction Time Test.jpg (124KB, 1664x909px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1664x909px

I broke it

>>376430313
>255 average of 5 tries
>almost forty

Eh, I guess it could be worse.

File: Dumb.jpg (43KB, 761x317px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 761x317px

Well, pretty decent considering I'm running on 5 hours sleep. Will try again tomorrow.

Also I'm dumb. What does it means when it says i'm in the top 45 percentile for this test?

>>376460481
it means you're better than 45% of people who took the test. Less than average but like you said, sleep deprived.

File: 1398374114763.jpg (365KB, 1200x750px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1200x750px

>>376460135
Thank you

>>376430313
Average 409, best 370some
I'll beat you fags in memory anyday, though.

>>376459450
What's your time? Got 409 on a pretty decent laptop here, so you might be right.

File: Untitled.png (4KB, 763x104px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 763x104px

>>376430313
21, played a lot of fast past jump around shooters and thought I was a special snowflake and fast, but look at OP and some of the nerds of the site, I really tried too.

I got 266 on my first run

File: sdaf.jpg (28KB, 737x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 737x300px

>tfw 22 and brain is already rotting away

>>376430313

215 avg with a wireless mouse

age 25

19, 195 avg

>>376435579
gee i sure hope you don't use google
or the internet

>>376430313
268ms average

fastest was 234

my monitor is older than I am, and I'm 23