Zombies must go

>>376243982

Zombies should just go completely. Move on to werewolves, vampires, dragons, or some other less famous mythological creature.

>>376243982
Frogposters

>>376243982
You.

>>376244143
and this.

>>376243982
Sand niggers were popular some years ago. They might make a return considering they can be fought in the West too nowadays.

File: dragon-quest-2.jpg (396KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1280x720px

Slimes are the best

>>376243982
Why make enemies?
They are too videogamey, this is the perfect chance to get rid of these gaming conventions and make a more interesting less padded experience

>>376244506
>why make enemies
Because they add variety of gameplay

Even portal had enemies

>>376243982
>what enemy should replace zombies as an easy, low IQ AI asset that's just as fun to kill.
N......

File: OOKOOK - africa.jpg (297KB, 1500x975px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1500x975px

Same AI
Same mob behavior

An all new enemy

>>376244121

Zombies are more or less used for the world setting. post-apocalyptic, no mythological creatures really bring post-apocalyptic.

>>376243982
Robot drones.

>>376244121

I don't think zombies count as mythological creatures. The modern "zombie" was basically invented by Hollywood in your parents' lifetime. If "zombie" is your umbrella term for any evil undead person, then I'm sure you could find plenty of myths to fit the bill, but if "zombie" means a mindless flesh eater whose victims become zombies, then they really don't belong in the same category as thing that actually came from ancient myths.

You could probably make the same argument about vampires, if they're the Dracula type.