What went right? What went wrong?

>>376109223
1 year to develop a sequel. 3 years to develop another. Oh how I miss the days when you had to wait 7 years for a sequel to drop.

>>376109223
It was shit from the start.

>Origins
Some went right, some went wrong, overall it was alright.

>2
Almost everything went wrong.

>Inquisition
Everything went wrong.

>>376109223
>Origins
A lot of things went right. Combat sucked though.
>II
A lot of things went wrong. The mechanics were too simplified
>Inquisition
It looked nice. And the combat was better than II but that's about it.

>>376111142
Awakening was an expansion. Besides:

>Baldur's Gate 1998
>Baldur's Gate: Tales of the Sword Coast 1999
>Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn 2000
>Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal 2001

>Fallout 1997
>Fallout 2 1998
>Fallout Tactics 2001

First two series that popped into my head.

>>376109223
wasn't dragon age 2 supposed to be an expansion like awakening but then turned it into a "full" game all of a sudden?

>>376109223
Origins was pretty cool as a game with its party and custom AI mechanics. But I didnt like the writing at all.

Less is more. They should have kept it minimal.

>>376109223
>What went right
Origins, Inquisition.
>What went wrong
II
>What went horribly wrong
Awakening

File: image.thumb.gif.25916995eaa3e4ff860a3a3574aa69ab.gif (692KB, 239x240px) Image search: [Google]

692KB, 239x240px

>>376112972
>Less is more

>>376112972
>>376112972
Agreed, they went almost Kingdom hearts 2 on it during the first game. Don't know about the other two since I didn't play them