Is this game worth buying? It looks like a basic 2d puzzle game, but it's 20 bucks and the setting seems interesting.
Wait until it goes 50% off or some shit.
Its like 3 hours long.
>>375986871
don't even think about giving them money for this pretentious 2hr game. Nothing is explained, no closure shit game.
>2017
>buying
Is the MC a boy or a girl?
>>375988106
A girl of course, gotta push that agenda; just kidding, it's just a cute girl doing cute things.
>>375986871
for 20 bucks, hell no
the game is only 2-3 hours with no replay value
just pirate the game, if you like it, buy it a 50% off
People who equate time spent on the game to monetary value, instead of enjoyment had with said game are retarded. I would take little nightmares for $60 over Final Fantasy 13 for $60.
The game is pretty damn good anon, it definitely could have explored a bit more; but what there is, is still good.
>>375988425
What makes your way correct and theirs wrong?
>>375986871
Loved the graphical style, I bought it and don't think I wasted my money doing so.
>>375988934
$15 would have been perfect, but I liked the style enough to buy it.
>>375988640
Art and entertainment hold a greater significance than time and monetary value. When I go and buy watercolors or acrylics I don't get the bigger tube/container. I get the color I want, because that holds a greater significance than "more". I know that analogy isn't particularly good, but I have a hard time explaining this.
And on a pure video game subject. Games that are significant in length generally do so by just repeating the same thing ad infinitum because budget and time spent creating can only g o so far. I would take a 20-30 hour RPG over a 100 hour one because the same themes and gameplay are going to be the same as the 20-30 hour one, but just copy and pasted tons of times.