Ghost Recon Wildlands

I would say
>Ubisoft
But R6:Siege was pretty good, so I'm optimistic about this too. The concept is at least neat.

Are there towers?

Can you co-op the single player/mission mode? It was a lot of fun taking down camps/doing assassinations in Far Cry 4 co-op.

Since Unity I vowed to never buy another Ubisoft game again.
So no.

>>323164603
its a full 4-player coop but you can also solo

File: 1406243372448.gif (2MB, 252x280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 252x280px

>Open World
Jesus Godamn Tits and Shits Galore Fucking why

>>323165504
It could be good or bad, but honestly its Ubisoft were talking about here

Farcry 4 had at least a decent "open world" (lots of varied side content, base and strongholds to takeover, etc.)

>>323163620
mildly optimistic, yes

I like the setting

I want this to be good but it has so much potential to end up like Watch Dogs and The Division it hurts.

>>323166693
What's bad about The Division now? I haven't paid attention to it since it was first announced

>>323166795
Aside of the obvious graphics downgrade it looks boring.

File: 1342949713929.jpg (215KB, 683x797px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 683x797px

From the gameplay they shown it looks fucking awful.
>bullets reach target instantly even if 600m away
>no bullet drop
>no recoil
>terrible bloodsplaptter effects and death animations I'd expect in a indie game with zero funds
>even slide of pistol didn't move

I don't expect a simulator, but some things just belong into a shooter which tries to be tactical.
Looks like the typical copy paste open world casual Ubishit game with no attention to details.

>>323163620
I just want to frank drug cartels and be able to do it from the start. Give me that and i'll buy it day one.

>>323166693
Me too, anon, me too. It could be a great military sandbox, but I'm so afraid that it will be ruined by the same cookie-cutter formula.