Is it worth it?
Also I heard there's a way to still play online. Anything about that?
>>322429529
I'm in a decent mood so I'll be nice
yeah folks still play, some servers get quite full on 64 depending on time of day and whatnot, though for some reason retards like making 24 or 32 person servers too.
either get the "patch" that fixes the in game server browser, or go through thrid-party shit like game ranger and the likes.
>>322429937
Where would I find this patch?
>>322429937
Explain
The only good servers on Gameranger are the swag servers, but they crash all the time. There would probably be more servers, but they get constantly ddos by whoever owns the swag servers.
>>322430645
might be it, got mine on the pirate bay a while back and cant find the torrent for it
http://globalwf.com/site/viewtopic.php?t=11023
>>322430753
what is there to explain
>>322431187
I have the game on steam, it will work, right? Also, aren't the servers on gameranger more populated or anything?
>>322432112
I use the patch with the steam version as well and it works fine.
Never compared the gameranger/normal server populations honestly, though I seemed to find more on the ingame than gamerangers
Fuck yes let's all play some Battlefront.
>>322431187
How does this work for the steam version?