IT

Watching what OP?

>>87747093
he's watching it

>>87747093
IT, the 1990's Tv Mini-Series

>>87747116
Watching what?

File: autism.png (3MB, 1447x1073px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1447x1073px

>they all go in the same class
>stutter guy even sits behind the girl in class
Was it autism?

>>87747183
You know it when you see it

File: 140916_em_sodagallery_josta.jpg (135KB, 279x425px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 279x425px

>>87747036
Yeah, yeah IT is pretty shit. No one fucking liked it when it came out, but it scared kids. Now the kids grew up so they remade it for them even though no one liked it when it first came out. It's just another remake targeted towards the Millennials because it's the largest demographic, even more than Baby Boomers. You're going to see every fucking thing that was great for 90s kids being remade into a movie. I wouldn't be surprised if they came out with a Limewire and a fucking Josta movie.

>>87747226
Cool I saw the rlm video too.

>>87747218
but what's the movie called??

>after all these years, we finally did it bev, we are IT after all...

Nice "movie" nostalgiafags

>>87747274
They said they're making a Josta and Limewire movie?

Is part 2 much weaker than part 1? IMDB says so

>>87747412
It's a snoozefest

File: 1.png (2MB, 1427x1073px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1427x1073px

Why is Bev kissing everyone is she the groups fucktoy?

File: slut.png (3MB, 1457x1075px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1457x1075px

>>87747466

>>87747442
only 1 hour left might aswell sit through it I guess

Chop out the adults and it's 1/2 a good movie, but because it keeps cutting back and forth from past to present they keep ruining it with shitty adult scenes.

>>87747502
Me on the left.

>>87747671
Yea the adults aren't fun to watch so far. They're gonna meet Henry Bowers now though that could be interesting

You got some action here >>87747466
Is it common for americlaps to kiss people that they are excited to see on the mouth?

>>87747466
>>87747502
t. Kv

>>87747305
Its called it
Ya git

>>87747839
Ityagit? Is it foreign?

Mike and Jay were right, the first half was perfect

>>87747036
I watched it and not a single scary scene.
Hopefully the new one is better.

>>87748059
hahahahahaha

>1990s made for tv movie based on a pleb-tier novel with typical 90s cheesy special effects and acting isn't good

woah

>>87747036
Its just old and dated man. I was never really a fano of it some parts were good but the movie was meh the remake looks better though.

>>87747036
Just watch the remake, it improved it in every way.

>>87747036
It's a funny movie but not really scary. Watching it for the first time reminded me of the time me and my friends watched The Exorcist in high school. We expected it to be scary but instead it was a demon screaming "Your mother sucks cocks in hell!", which will never not be funny to teenage boys

Everything /tv/ says is shit, my friends say is good. What gives?

>>87747466
Kind of, when they were kids they all banged her after they defeated it while still in the sewer, so they could feel together and loved or some shit.

>>87748188
It's simple.
Your friend has shit taste

>>87748158

You weren't raised Catholic, I see. The Exorcist fucked me pretty good, only book that's given me nightmares.

>30 years later
but it's only been 27 years between 1990 and 2017 how lame

>>87747036
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=houP7mAjZ0o
agreed

>>87747502
>tfw no lewd french kissing everyone gf

>>87748559
i thought that was pretty cool

>>87748734
I would have been if they actually followed the lore. It's supposed to come out in 2020 then

>>87747226
I wish I had a josta to drink that wasnt 20 years old

>>87747199
Why was Eddie such a boss as a kid but then such a wimp as an adult? As a child he seemed to have lots of confidence. Just look at the way he stands in all his scenes. Then compare him to his virgin adult.

It's bizarre

File: slut.png (1MB, 1057x1019px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1057x1019px

>>87748708
seriously wtf is going on here

>>87748789
the chad inhaler
the virgin four-eyes

>>87748821
So touching that they finally got together now that Bev is going through menopause and can't have kids

It says that Stanley was born 1950 and IMDB list the kids at 12 years old thus making it 1962 or 1963 when the shit goes down. Why are they saying he shows up every 30 years?

>>87748886
would still smash with a condom

File: slut.png (2MB, 1311x1079px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1311x1079px

>>87748821
Is the second part just a drawn out porno?

>>87748930
He shows up every 27 years.

File: 1404844996122.jpg (27KB, 699x471px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 699x471px

>the kid actors of the 90s tv mini series playing the adults in the next chapter of the movie

are they all still alive? could that happen?

File: nig.png (2MB, 1249x1071px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1249x1071px

>>87749033
not according to this shitty movie

>>87749065
The only relevant one is Seth Green

>>87749110
Another thing the remake got right that the original all got wrong

>>87747036
Yeah it sucks. Fucking terrible piece of shit.
people will dickride it anyway though because it's from their childhoods and it has Tim Curry in it

>>87749122
I would be severely pissed if they put Seth Green in the second movie after new kid Tozier stole the fucking show.

I saw it when I was a kid and rewatched a few months ago out of hype for the new movie, and yes, it's a steaming turd. Don't believe nostalgia fags.

>>87749011

Stephens sex fetish

>>87749065
That fag from Neverending story part 2 killed himself

File: brandis.png (139KB, 669x345px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 669x345px

>>87749065
>are they all still alive?
Guy who played kid Ben is dead the rest are alive

>>87749122
this desu

>>87749133
baka desu senpai. Was it 27 years in the book?

>>87749185
Tozier kid was great. Grown up Tozier is an unfunny tryhard
>IF I YELL LOUDER IT WILL BE FUNNY

>>87747226
It's not a remake of the miniseries it's an adaption of the novel.

>>87747226

90's normies are the fucking worst.

>lel look i posted my kidz bop cd on instagram while cleaning my room!
>power rangers was awesome
>muh Nickelodeon
>muh boy meets world
>i was born in 1994 and my brain never developed until 2010 but i'm such a 90's kid

>>87747036
well it's a tv mini series, what do you expect?

File: Perkins.png (119KB, 665x341px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 665x341px

I would "perk her" if you know what I mean

>>87749269
He played Bill. Ben is the chubby kid.

>>87749360
The people most obsessed with the 90s are 90s babies whose actual childhood would be the early-mid 2000s.

>>87749417
You are correct. My bad typo

File: slut.png (2MB, 1441x1073px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1441x1073px

3rd guy she kissed. that's 50 % of the group

>>87749539
nevermind it was Pennywise

File: slut.png (2MB, 1419x1073px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1419x1073px

>>87749574
okay now it was her

Holy fuck part 2 sucked. Part 1 was just decent

>>87749701
The second part is almost unwatchable, stop when you're ahead

>>87750436
>1st part
7/10

2nd part
4/10

>>87747036
It was a made for tv movie that had the budget of a ham sandwich and had to be PG rated. Still better than nu-IT.

>>87747036

It's one of the most over-hyped pieces of "horror" ever made. The main reason people know about it is because they always saw it at Blockbuster and le spooky clowns.

>>87747036
>he fell for the "original IT is better than the new one" contrarian meme
*breathes in*

>>87751245
>4/10
being generous honestly

File: ecli_7Cp.jpg (24KB, 377x325px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 377x325px

>>87747093

>>87747036
Not the best, most King adaptations are garbage, but Tim Curry is worth every second he's on film. Watch it just for him.

Tim Curry was the only saving grace for this. The spider at the end was great, but hilariously outdated now.

>>87747036
Tell me what you buy with all the shillbucks you make

Don't fall for the Disney antishilling, the new movie is kino and the old one is trash. Stop watching right where you are, it won't get better

>>87748086
bev at her old house is scary don't lie pleb

Just watched it for the first time today, I liked how the story was setup. Everyone getting a phone call and their memories come back. Pretty comfy

>>87748775
Lore of the book is actually 27 years. For some reason the tv miniseries rounded up.

>>87747226
>Limewire movie
target audience: pirates
sounds good bro

>1990 IT Part 1
6/10
>1990 IT Part 2
1/10
>2017 IT
7/10

>>87748208
She only came twice, so she's not a ho

>remake shit film = modern goat
copy and paste

>>87747036
Fuck you, it's the second half that's shitty. The first half is top comfykino.

>>87748137
Nah, it was shit then, too. Only good part was it was free on TV. This was back in dinosaur times when people paid for things.

>>87749011
It's part of the disturbing parts of American suburbia, abused girl from a broken home becomes a boy group's plaything. King does it weird definitely, if I remember in the book he even talks about the kids orgasming with each other but she only does with Mike and Bill. The time skip is so the reader gets the impression of overcoming childhood fear, which is why he crammed so many standard milestones in there.

IT 1990 Part 1:
>5.5/10
Part 2
>3/10
It 2017
>8/10

>>87755671

Only the fat kid makes her cum

>>87754830
They made one for the pirate bay. Limewire deserves its own movie.

>>87747036
Pleb.

>>87748789
he's mgtow

>>87748158
>watch horror while chilling with your bros
>expect to be filled with terror

Movies aren't magic anon, they're just film and sound. You have to meet them halfway, and let the movie inside you.

Unironically think it's a great start. Also, I think the kids really did a good job this movie. I was not expecting believable acting in the movie when the principal cast was almost entirely teenagers.

>>87758546
Should specify that I'm referring to the new movie. The miniseries was alright for the first half, and the second had some of my favorite parts from Tim Curry but was otherwise total trash.

File: a61.jpg (34KB, 600x665px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x665px

>>87747036
>>87747226
>>87747442
>>87747528
>>87748086
>>87748137
>>87748145
>>87749110
>>87749138
>>87749196
>>87749360
>>87750436

salt detected.

90's It part 1 i think is better than 2017 part 1.
however part 2 is the best in my opinion.
who wants to watch kids more than adults?

File: Stephen-King-IT-Paperback-1990-Made-For-TV-Movie-Tie-In.jpg (34KB, 275x400px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 275x400px

>>87747226
You're somewhat wrong. It actually got good reviews back then but the miniseries got a lot of shit for the last confrontation with Pennywise and IT's final form. I saw it recently and I actually liked it more than I did back then. I read the book before I even saw the miniseries ages ago and I didn't even think it was one of King's best books. It was a bit ponderous like all his 5,000 page books. The book, the miniseries and the new movie are all slightly better than average that's why /tv/ keeps posting threads about it. I don't have any nostalgia for the miniseries either, like I said I enjoyed the drama of it but the ending was nothing like the book and it reminded me of some shitty Patty Duke giant spider movie mixed with The Fly. The book wasn't even that scary at all. I think King wasn't even trying to be scary after The Shining anyways, but to say the 2017 is a vast improvement over the miniseries is a joke. The irony of the hate the miniseries meme is that you can tell the makers of the 2017 version actually have a soft spot for the miniseries because a lot of set pieces and child actors are similar to it.