2017 > 1990

File: let's go shopping papa.png (555KB, 900x883px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 900x883px

>>87735802

I agree

File: IMG_3126.jpg (11KB, 169x169px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 169x169px

>>87735802
1990:

>funny and likable antagonist that is actually frightening during creepy moments

2017:

>edgemaster clown costume with lots of edgy blood and edgy voice

>>87735802
I can see how kids would be lured by the one on the right more than the one on the left. If chapter 2 improves though, the better of the adaptions will probably be 2017. 1990's second half is unwatchable.

Yes.
>>87735932
>actually frightening during creepy moments
He has zero frightening moments, the movie is not scary, you spend more time laughing and finding it comedic than being scared.
Shut the fuck up nostalgia fag

>>87735802
lol the 1990s movie is a made for tv movie, aka, cheap in every way imaginable. This movie would have been forgotten in time if it weren't for Tim Currys entertaining performance. That's literally the only redeeming factor for the old movie. 2017 movie, the kids carry the film instead of the clown, which makes for a better picture when the kids are 90% of your movie.

>>87736044
t.19 yr old

>>87735932
If you think the miniseries was ever frightening, you need to kill yourself.

>>87735932
You used the word "edge" three times. It's almost as if you are chanting this buzzword, as if you believe it's some sort of magic talisman that if you repeat it enough times, will make some nebulous "point" for you, that you are too lazy or stupid to even bother framing with actual words.

File: God Damn.jpg (67KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 630x630px

>>87736890

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=houP7mAjZ0o

>>87737399
Don't you DARE speak to me

>>87735802
Scooby Doo > 2017 > 1990

File: this is a scene in a scary horror movie.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>87736044
>He has zero frightening moments, the movie is not scary, you spend more time laughing and finding it comedic than being scared.
I agree. The 2017 version is a fucking joke.

The original actually sucked so Idk why I went to watch the 2017 version.

That said, 2017 blew it out of the fucking water. Incredible movie.

2017 It can only hurt you when you're afraid of it. It goes around in its Pennywise form to frighten children, but literally cannot kill you if you're not afraid of it.

1990 It can attack you whenever the fuck it wants, and only scares you first because you "taste" better that way. It takes on the Pennywise form not because it has to, but just to fuck with you before you die.

1990 It wins in a knockout.

>>87735802
I saw IT (2017) yesterday, and then I saw the 1990's one this morning. I never watched IT, or paid any attention to it prior. The 2017 one is INFINITELY better. 1990's one has shit pacing, is cheesy as fuck, and is cheap as fuck too. It is a mini series, so it gets a pass on the cheap but uh, yea. I enjoyed the new one alot more.

/tv/ sure is talking about this movie a lot. i thought it looked too shitty to even download. is it really worth watching?

>>87738320
>Director of Cinematography: Idubbbz

>>87736890

I always just assume people who use edgy every other word are underageb&

>>87735802
Billy's a better IT, Tim's a better clown.

Someone post the webm pls

>>87738858
huh. well put

>>87738716
Thanks Ebert, how is hell?

Sorry the 1990 version wasn't paced to the slow wit of the cell phone and social media age, we used landlines and letters back then.

>>87735802
movie is better than the miniseries but Curry is better and with better production and CGI eyes like the newfag got it wouldn't even be close

>>87738925
>A slow movie can't be paced well
You're retarded. There are slow movies that are paced well, the original just has bad pacing period

>>87738858
new clown is so stupid looking there's nothing scary about it.

Like a woman trying way too hard to look hot, I can see right through the heels, 3 hour hair and makeup, and stupid tight dress right into your insecure soul.

It's way more effective when the monster looks a little more casual or natural and not "ooooh I'm so fucking creepy, goddamn I am the creep master, look at my spiky hair and gray washed out clothes, ooh shit I am soo fucking scary." Like IT the monster was staring in the fucking mirror for hours getting his creep on, it's so goddamn stupid. Original IT looks like a space monster looked at a clown for 5 seconds and this was his interpretation, like you wouldn't notice the difference. Uncanny valley shit, like Vincent Donofrio in MIB, the alien was CLOSE to human, even despite wearing a skin bag.

>>87735851
>imagining these two IT's as roomies

thats actually kinda cute

>>87739035
>A slow movie can't be paced well
WHEW you're reading comprehension is shit mate
I said the cell phone generation had slow wit, and you are proving my point. dumbos love fast past jump scare trash

File: you're pennywise not sweet tooth.png (208KB, 800x555px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 800x555px

>>87739166

>>87739187
ok gramps

>>87739113
Someone who actually fucking gets it.

>>87739113
Shut the fuck up already. Jesus Christ. If you were 10/11 years old in some podunk town in the 80s, the 2017 clown would be scary as fuck. N

File: IMG_8713.jpg (1MB, 2655x3543px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2655x3543px

I think if you were to combine Curry and Skarsgard's portrayals of IT you would have the perfect Pennywise. Both performances are great imo and I actually think Skarsgard channeled his brother's character Floki on Vikings more than Curry's original performance

Skarsgard gives a good performance and legit tried hard for this role but I feel like that costume just sabotages his every effort, it tries so hard to be disturbing that it ends up having the opposite effect no matter how good his acting was.

I have not seen either film or read the book but lol this is /tv/ so I'm gonna weigh in anyway

Tim Curry looks like an actual clown who could be at a children's party but would also fucking terrify those children. 2017 guy looks like a horror movie character who would never pass for a working clown.

File: carnac.jpg (23KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 300x300px

>>87739113
>Like a woman trying way too hard to look hot, I can see right through the heels, 3 hour hair and makeup, and stupid tight dress right into your insecure soul.

Dies a virgin.

Why are people pretending that It was ever good.

>>87739323
Goddamn this guy was the one who took the genetic hit for the rest of the Skarsgard family. Like the manlet hemsworth brother

>>87739255
guess what faggot, I'm an adult in a fucking movie theater. So is everyone else watching this. "Duuuuuh if you were a kid and saw a CGI cartoon car like in Cars drive through your yard you'd be excited!" Well guess what, neither are ever going to happen and if a character from Cars, or IT, or Frozen or whatever show up at my house I seriously could fucking care.

God what a stupid fucking argument. "Hey man, if it showed up at your house...!" Oh yeah, go fuck yourself, it's a fucking movie. I don't watch movies wondering if it's going to happen later, in fact knowing that it won't allows for BETTER things to happen on screen, but obviously this movie was lacking ALL of those better things and just sucked a big fucking lemon.

>>87739113
>Original IT looks like a space monster looked at a clown for 5 seconds and this was his interpretation, like you wouldn't notice the difference. Uncanny valley shit, like Vincent Donofrio in MIB, the alien was CLOSE to human, even despite wearing a skin bag.

No, original It looks like a serial killer clown. New It is what you just described.

File: 20992566.png (419KB, 606x602px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 606x602px

>>87735802
Nu-IT looks fucking terrible, like one of those autistic fanfic drawings on deviantart. I dont know if it is the actor, or the makeup that is focused on making him look so edgy and stupid instead of going for a normal clown look like the original pennywise.

I have no idea how the designer got a greenlight for it. It's as bad as Letos Joker character. They even overdesigned the fucking costume.

>>87738320
So people actually this shit scary? It looks like that porn gif with the dude fucking a girl standing up while his friend does a similar dance

>>87738320
I still cant believe this is real. This garbage actually got a sequel in the making.

>>87739624
>waaahhhh!! WAAAAAAHHHH

>>87739439
>women aren't insecure
have you ever had a woman beg you for comments? It's pathetic

>>87735932
We get it, you saw the 90's version when you were a kid and also old is always better.

File: IMG_8566.jpg (121KB, 1024x694px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1024x694px

>>87739483
Poor guy

>>87739524
I bet It would show up to you as a job and responsibilities and lack of access to /tv/ to complain and bitch about stupid shit on.

>>87739718
He looks like a more handsome Steve Buscemi

File: pogo.jpg (98KB, 561x721px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 561x721px

>>87739551

>>87739573
no you fucking retard that scene was comedic relief, go watch the fucking movie before posting in my thread

File: IMG_8716.jpg (26KB, 225x289px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 225x289px

>>87739773
He absolutely does holy shit

Those googly eyes

>>87739831
I already did. In 1990. All Hollyjew does now are remakes, shitty sequels and prequels and bleed out old franchises as much as possible with a bunch of more sequels and spinoffs.

>>87739734
The remake is bad enough, I'd just get a copy in the mail.

>>87735802
Opposite day?

You shills still shilling, pathetic.

File: Dining out.webm (1MB, 1719x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1719x720px

>>87735802
This part really scared me in the 1990 one.

>>87738608
>2017 It can only hurt you when you're afraid of it. It goes around in its Pennywise form to frighten children, but literally cannot kill you if you're not afraid of it.
thats bullshit

>>87739892
>I didn't see the new film but I know the context of it hahaha im so smart

woah

>>87738320
This not being scary has nothing to do with the false notion that Tim Curry's Pennywise was ever scary.

>>87739831
>literally trying to defend OAP OAP GANGNAM STYLE

Well it wasn't very funny, dipshit.

2017 IT was decent. I have to say that the horror parts were probably the shittiest part of the entire film. New pennywise had zero personality.

>>87738608
>1990 It can attack you whenever the fuck it wants, and only scares you first because you "taste" better that way.
And people say the new one is "edgy"

Any links so I can watch it??

1990 was more imaginative.

>>87740145
>le nostalgia reply

>>87735932
Just like the book then.

>>87740186
>le redditor reply

>>87739934
>ywn get paid to do this

>>87740145
because it has all the shit that's going to be in the new movie's sequel? Yeah being a shitty made for TV miniseries fused into a "movie" will do that I suppose

File: Bozo.jpg (58KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1280x720px

>>87735802
1976>1990>2017
Hollywood has lost all understanding of subtlety and can not figure out what makes original concepts what they are.

>>87740254
Life already fucks me in the ass every day for free.

>>87738320
This is youtube tier

>>87736044

>le nostalgia goggles

opinion dismissed

File: hqdefault.jpg (18KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x360px

Nostalgia Fags ITT:

>Man, the new IT wasn't scary at all, fucking pathetic!
>Old IT was so scary! Ah! Curry Clown gave me nightmares!

>>87740048
>no quips=no personality

>>87740549

I'm sorry but the Curry Clown was just creepier, I'm sorry that you cant argue this past typing 'NOSTALGIA FAGS!!!' like a spaz.

>>87740111
https://www.fandango.com/

>>87740549
I only watched the miniseries a few years ago, it was alright I guess but you have to be a huge faggot to deny Curry's performance was 10/10.

>>87738320
Bev didn't look that scared.

>>87740702
nah mate, I liked Curry's performance. I'm just talking about the scare factor

New one was so dude convenient jumpscares lmao

>>87738716
>implying the 2017 didn't feel like a TV movie with just a much bigger budget.
You probably prefer Zak Snyder's version of Dawn of the Dead over Romero's too because it looks more boujee

>>87740800
>scare factor
are you twelve?

>>87739934
Source please.

>>87735802
Put Tim Curry's voice with the new IT monster and it'd be perfect

>>87740800
>scare factor
It's a fucking demon taking the form of a clown to appeal to innocence and lure the kids in. It's not supposed to look scary as a clown. At least Curry didn't push for fangs.

>>87738746
Kek

File: 5d738b26-7c68-4a28-83f5-6a4d087eb07d_560_420.jpg (45KB, 560x420px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 560x420px

>>87735802
/tv/ literally wouldn't give a shit about this movie if the 1990 superior version existed. 90's Bev is best Bev btw

As someone who doesn't give a shit about horror and superhero movies and all that, I thought the guy who plays Pennywise was also the guy who plays The Joker on Gotham. Just found out now that they are different actors.

Thanks for reading.

THIUS MOVIE IS DESTROYING THE JOBS OF REAL CLOWNS! WE NEED TO STOP THIS!!

File: xkF8HX.gif (985KB, 500x289px) Image search: [Google]

985KB, 500x289px

>>87741315
http://www.cinemablend.com/news/1697319/real-clowns-are-losing-work-because-of-it-and-theyre-not-happy

File: IT.webm (871KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 1280x720px

>>87741018
Wrong.

>>87740302
Holy shit, in this pic bozo is scariest of all!

The thing about clowns is it's a game of facades, there's such a try-hard joviality that's masking something else, you don't know exactly *what* else but it doesn't exactly seem benign when they're trying to appeal to children...

That's why in terms of delivery Tim Curry's clown is better, he has that joviality that masks something blank.... that turns out to be pure evil. When skarsgard is trying to radiate menace to begin with it kind of breaks the formula of why clowns are scary.

But that being said

2017 movie>>>>>1990 miniseries
BUT
Tim Curry's clown>>>> Skarsgard's clown

>>87738320
The whole point of this scene is Pennywise trying to be scary but failing. Maybe you fucks should actually see something before you judge it.

File: George_Costanza_Hat.jpg (19KB, 400x290px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x290px

How can you not know Bozo?

>>87741668
With attempts that bad I can't imagine how anyone is afraid of him

File: 0999 (2).jpg (304KB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1280x1920px

>>87735802
I never read the book, so i don't understand the character.

>a clown landed on earth
>goes on a year long child killign spree every 27 years
>won't kill the kids until they're scared enough
>killed Georgie when he was barely scared

It's such a stupid character, i think it's cool that he basically traps kids in a fun house and torments them, but why didn't he just kill them, it's like he wanted them to get him, as if he were the Predator or some shit

>>87741668
everyone in the theater I went to laughed at this scene

>>87741768
So did I, it made me laugh because of how weird it was, it didn't make me scared but it also didn't make me comfortable.

I feel like the worst part of the new movie is the clown, and the horror he tries so hard to brings with him. The kids bits are actually done really nicely, but the clown really drags the movie down since there's no subtlety to the horror and even weirder all the chase ends with the clown every time. I did think overall it was better than 90's rendition but only because the 90's version tries to tackle both parts and the second part is such hot garbage. I also think they could have gone down a couple kids since they messed with what each kid's role was. They really didn't need Hanlon at all and he basically does nothing in this movie.

>>87739255
faggot detected

>>87738320
Everyone in my theater laughed during this scene. How about you guys?

>>87741743
>killed Georgie when he was barely scared
The child got his arm ripped off, I think he was plenty scared by the time he was dragged into the sewer, and assuming this is his first kill since waking up, the dude was probably hungry and anything would do.
In the end he didnt kill them because he got cocky and sloppy

>>87735802
like it was something difficult to do

I enjoyed 2017 a lot more than the TV original. That said, there were moments where I felt like Curry's voice would have made the scene so much more frightening.

>>87738320
Holy shit is this real?

I think the general consensus is that the 2017 movie is good for everything BUT the clown/scary shit. Meanwhile, the 1990 movie is all shit except for Tims performance. Basically its a reversal also 2017 bev is better

>>87741832
There were some scenes in the new movie that Pennywise did pretty well, the scene where he crawls out of the fridge and "It was real enough for Georgie" were great in my opinion, but then it falls flat with Pennywise zooming toward the camera all scary

>>87741743
Creepy clown is allegorical of childhood innocence and fears. That's all you need to know.

>people think that curry was supposed to be scary
Am i missing something here? I thought he was just supossed to be creepy or annoying and the scary stuff would be the exploding blood baloons or something

The second half of the 1990 version is quite bad

>>87742004
yea, I almost slept through it

>>87741618
I agree for the most part. I've been partly trolling and partly honestly discussing. I've always found that iteration of Bozo a little off. Like the hair is alluding to spikes and aggressiveness without looking like that was the intent (it obviously was not the intent of Bozo, but that's the look I think they should go after in IT) bright flaming orange-red, the makeup making the facial features weird as much as happy.
Does Pennywise have some convincing moments in the new one?

File: 9c0.jpg (43KB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x480px

>>87742004
>that scene where everyone is kissing the woman on the mouth
It was so awkward when i first saw it but now that i know about the gangbang in the book i can only imagine it was supossed to be in the part 1 of the miniseries

>>87741998
The scariest part of him was all the fucked shit he pulled on the main cast and got away with, but he wasnt so much scary, as just very unnerving

>>87741947
Meh. The cast of the original looked and acted more like 12 yr olds than the remake where they drop the f bomb every 5 minutes. Dorky kids didn't say "fuck" all the time back in 1989 like online 12 yr old gamer ragers do today. The original cast looked legitamitely scared of Pennywise. The kids in the remake seem too unbelievably ballsy about Pennywise.

File: 729.gif (227KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 600x600px

>>87737522

>>87741743
whos that next to alice? her mom? does she have a thyroid condition?

>>87741956
yeah that's kinda what i meant by >no subtlety. Every starting scene that's good is totally undermined by just ramping too hard. I really liked the start of the bev sink scene where hair, blood and creepy voices are coming out of the drain but then suddenly it explodes outwards everywhere and covers everything. They just try too hard. If they just like cut every single horror scene right before it goes full retard, the new movie might be a lot better.

>>87742026
Kids these days can't handle dramatic overtones in a horror film. Sad. Too busy thinking about Jake Paul or the latest may mays i guess.

>>87742259
>dramatic overtones in a horror film
>The ending of 1990 IT
>dramatic

I think its time for your meds grampa

>>87742108
Well, as always, really the scariest moment is him in the sewers in the very beginning talking to georgie (in both the miniseries and the movie). Skarsgard really sells this well as he's not really trying to be spooky, he's trying to be friendly and charming which is *far* more spooky than *trying to be spooky*, it's like the regular clown shtick.

He's so friendly and charming that you can see how a kid would read it as friendly even though the notion of a man being in the sewers during a storm can and would trigger red flags in any adult.

This is really about how the clown was played in most of the series, the manner and words being friendly, the menace being implied. They should have stuck to that formula more in Skarsgard's performance. When the clown tries to be spooky (also a flaw in the orignal but much less so) it falls into traditional monster movie tropes and really loses a lot of the scare factor.

File: 423456563.jpg (2MB, 1949x4500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1949x4500px

>>87742188
delet

File: IMG_3026.jpg (57KB, 751x418px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 751x418px

>>87736890
You're on fucking 4chan browsing /tv/ out of all boards. Every thread on this board is either bait, shitposting, or funposting... and there are. Just fucking sitting there being a waste of existence calling out meme words on fucking /tv/.

Kindly hang yourself with chicken wire.

>>87741863
Eddie Cochoran was his first kill after waking up. It was Eddie's brother Dorsey that woke Pennywise in 1957.

>>87742422
>Every thread on this board is either bait, shitposting, or funposting

project harder faggot, it's not our fault that those threads entice faggots like you the most

>>87742340
That was the only action in the 2nd half. Obviously not what i was referring to dipshit.

>>87735802
Gee, what an achievement
1990 was utter dogahit, straight to TV flick, that was 50 times worse than the book, im baffled that people here enjoyed it.
Havent seen the new one yet, but i dont see how can it be worse

>>87741743
It is a cosmic being of evil from the void around the universe called the Macroverse. It landed on earth millions of years ago in the area that would eventually become Derry, waiting for humanity to arrive so it could feed on it. Once humans settled the area It would awake then feed in cycles of 27 years. It can kill whatever it wants however it wants, but prefers the taste of fear in flesh so tends to go after kids.

>>87742608
I think you got 1990's IT mixed up with the cringy The Shining miniseries.

>>87742720
no anon, 90s IT is literally a TV movie

>>87738983
He was actually doing that with his eyes. Wasn't CGI.

>>87735851
It is cute! CUTE!

>>87742768
>implying a tv movie can't be good because it was shot vertically
Kys

>>87739831
Um..no it's not.

>>87741598
YOU JUST KNOW

>>87742163
>Dorky kids didn't say "fuck" all the time back in 1989 like online 12 yr old gamer ragers do today

you fucking what, kids curse frequently all the time, just out of earshot of adults

I like both desu

>>87743731
Where did i imply that?

how much of Bev getting abused as an adult do you think they will show?

>>87735851
any lewds of them in this style?

File: IMG_8684.jpg (45KB, 300x450px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 300x450px

I wish someone would've handed this movie over to Robert Rodriquez and told him to give it the Faculty treatment

>>87744237

So it'd flop?

>>87739686
T. moans your cousin does while I penetrate her

>>87738608
lmao so why did none of the 1990 main kids die then stupid faggot

>>87735802
>The Virgin IT

vs.

>The Chad Pennywise

>>87741668
>Tries to find a way of scaring her
>Dances like an asshole
Kek

>>87739778
Fuck that shit man imagibe a gacy film as pogo.

>>87736146
No... I'LL KILL YOU INSTEAD MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>>87744342
Because he kept trying to make them more and more delicious numbnuts. You talk like you know what a fag is so I bet you give really good head huh candyboy? Yeah just mmmmm suck me real good just like that...

>>87740392

>>87740657
I'm sorry but it's time for you.... to die....

The problem with 2017 It is that it's competing against Tim Curry, an actor so good he single handily manged to carry a 3 hour mini series and leave most people with a lasting impression, even after it went really bad.

The current IT can't. They banked way too hard on the "scary" when the power of the performance comes from mixing terror and comedy. One minute you've got a clown making jokes, the next minute it's hissing at you with razer teeth and saying it's going to kill an eat you.

>>87741598
She's irritatingly attractive and makes me feel uncomfortable

>>87735932
>1990
>actually frightening during creepy
No. He looks like a cuck.

>>87746725
looks like a fucking irish boy in a wig you fag

File: 1505256194417.jpg (163KB, 1335x685px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1335x685px

I'll kill you all -NYAH HAH!-

>>87739255
>If you were 10/11 years old in some podunk town in the 80s, the 2017 clown would be scary as fuck.

Way to miss the point, moron.

>>87743874
My friends and I grew up in the 90's and we certainly didn't curse much if at all until our early teens

>>87746924
Not uh

>>87740851
girl with the dragon tattoo

pleb

>>87739718
>>87739483

Why is it always the middle brother who gets fucked over? Hemsworthlet is the middle one too.

He's fucking beautiful and I loved him in Hemlock Grove

File: it.gif (2MB, 245x150px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x150px

>>87738320
>DANCE OFF BRO
ahahahahahaha.glad i didnt waste my money on this shit

Bill Skarsgard does great physical acting in this movie, like the way he walks up to Eddie in this scene:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JccOmi-8CMc

But they rely on CGI too much. He could have been much better than Currywise without it.

>>87739624
Most people liked the movie. Seeing a 15 second webmd without sound doesn't really give you a good idea about the quality of the film.

>>87740241
>le "le redditor reply" reply

>>87740950
What do you mean? Curry's pennywise does have fangs.

>>87740549
Old It wasn't just scary, it had better bonding scenes.

Also, it wasn't set in the 1980s for
>DUDE 80S LMAO
bonus points

>>87747782

>that baby crying

Christ. Why bring your child to a fucking R18 horror movie of all things?

>>87742422

Our reality in a nutshell, so to speak.

"Look at that boys, all it takes is a little fear to make a paper man crumble."

and what happened at the end of the movie?
really really great dialogue in this movie that wasnt even in the book

>>87745773
yea and like other people were saying the CG was too weak to carry the film, it was a good movie, and the kids were fucking golden, but the IT monster had me laughing more than scared and i wasnt genuinely scared the whole movie, but then again i read the book and im 26

(read the book when i was t h i r t e e n )

>>87738320
CLOWN WITH THE SICKNESS

IMMA GONNA KILL THAT FUCKING CLOWN GIRL POWER

There's a reason scary movies are lame, because only little girls get actually scared by them. This movie has such a marketing hype job it's ridiculous how much people are talking about it. The movie follows standard "scary movie" plot with CGI clown.
Again this isn't amazing plot or dialogue, it's just a shitty horror movie where the killer kills, then gets killed at the end. Basic movie as fuck and not kino.

>>87750119
>>87750119
This new Pennywise has to be the scariest movie monster we've ever seen. Ever. I was so scared every minute I almost peed myself. Every time Pennywise or one of his minions was on screen I got more and more afraid. Can't wait for chapter 2 to make me more afraid next september.

File: capture-2017-09-15-00h45m00s176.jpg (64KB, 720x304px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 720x304px

>>87735802
>>87735851
>>87736044
>>87737399
>>87738320
Who else is /pepperonitits/ here?

>>87750301
while the movie was on i told my friend besides me all the kids run trains on that redhead in the sewers in the book

No fucking shit this movie sucked, the original movie also fucking sucked. Really curious as to what kind of person you are if you genuinely enjoyed this film.

>>87735802
They both suck. The new one has better effects and acting, the old one has a few creepy part from what I remember. Neither of them are actually scary though, and neither of them are good films.

>>87750364
>>87750431

neither of the movies were even 10% as enjoyable as the book but could you really expect it to match what the book at?

there was like a fucking pterodactyl fight in the book, WHERES MY STONE DINOSAUR

>>87750580

Most Stephen King film adaptations are either pretty good (Green Mile, MAYBE Shining) or pure shit. This one was most insulting by just being mediocre.

>>87750580
The book suck, the 1990 miniseries sucks, the 2017 comedy movie suck.

>>87750615
i guess i have to agree with you

>>87750638
the book was fantastic, you neanderthal, i dont even think the dark tower series is his crowning achievement, i think IT is

>>87735802
They're both garbage

>>87750688
Stephen King is a hack, without airport kiosks he wouldn't sell well at all. King is like the novels for women with Fabio on them but for men. Its meandering to the intellect to read his maudlin shit.

>>87750776
yes hes a hack and hes not very smart at all but hes an entertaining hack, if you want to try to argue that something has to be intellectual and smartly geared in every aspect to do well or entertain, you'd have to argue against money and that's something you can't do in a market that runs on it, entertainment value is subjective and the amount of entertainment someone gets from something is relative to there reference level, in other words you are wrong because many people would be at the reference level that this is considered good and thus he has a wide demographic and can be a successful hack

that and i just want to try supporting a book that has young boys run trains on a little girl

>>87742163
Are you kidding? Kids swear all the time. ESPECIALLY when they're around that age.

>>87750986
some of the things they were talking about were a little too high reference level for kids in that time era

sources: degree in child psychology i can't find jobs with now

How are they going to adapt Tom in part 2? Could a person like Tom exist in modern times?

>>87735802
>left
look at me I'm a scary clown, listen to this scary noise so you know when I'm being scary

>right
juxtaposition of innocent childish imagery with horrific imagery to fuck with your head

>>87751012
>Could a person like Tom exist in modern times?

There are horrifically abusive husbands, yes.

>>87751059
OH WA AH AH AH

>>87750301
is this the underage gangbang scene?

I could never finish the book desu. It's like 25,000 fucking pages.

>>87751104
only a little over 1000 you big baby, i read it in school

I knew you stupid faggots would get this wrong.
>"herr derr nu-It is soooo much better than Tim Curry's It"
WRONG
nu-It is:
>not scary
>has no creepy, sarcastic personality
>has none of the "initial charm" that made the Tim Curry one so effective
>barely speaks
>when he does speak I could hardly understand what he was saying
>Tim Curry standing on the side of the road holding a few balloons was scarier than nu-It eating a bloody arm

I knew you numale faggots would get it wrong again.

>>87751204
I am still scared by this new Pennywise. I haven't been able to sleep for a week, IT is THAT scary. Trust me.

>>87751308
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFMY-oF8D_U

>>87751327
I can't watch that, just thinking about this new Pennywise makes me lose more sleep. Its so scary don't see this movie guys, it will fuck you up.

>>87751327
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmin5WkOuPw

>>87751351
do you get off to being pedantic

>>87751204
I totally agree on this.

Old IT as simplistic it looks, it worked wonderful. You had no idea what that clown motherfucker was up to, because he looked so calm, non-violent and cynic.

>>87751378
What is pedantic mean?

It does like fear to make he flesh taste better and that's part of it but pennywise also feeds on the emotion as well. There is more than one "IT" in King's universe. For instance there is one in the dark tower series that makes Roland and Susannah laugh so hard hey almost choke to death all the while it is getting younger feeding on their maniacal laughter.

I can't wait for the Clown Cinematic Universe to leave MCCU and DCCU in the dust.

>>87735802
You need to have a terminal case of autism to think otherwise. 2017 is a good movie is 1990 is judt shit

>>87751426
Just reading that makes me afraid to go to sleep tonight, that's fucked up. How can someone come up with something so fucked up and scary.

File: received_937945889580292.jpg (11KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 413x395px

Look at all these edgy kids who spent 15 dollars and wasted 2.15 hours of their lives just so they could run and say online how IT sucked. Despite the fact that when you're online no one really cares what you say

>>87751520
could have watched the dark tower movie instead


i guess steven king isnt done making money yet

S T O P

I just much prefer the way the clown in the 90's version looked. He comes off as a friendly clown at first glance but as you get a closer look his eyes become off-colour and menacing.

New clown is too clean and sounds like a goofy retard.

>people actually picking the miniseries
>people denying the 2017 is the NOTABLY superior version
Holy contrarianism Batman!

>>87751204
>nu-this nu-that
Holy shit kill yourself.

File: 1430492116093.png (124KB, 262x288px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 262x288px

>Pennywise itself isn't supposed to be scary in clown form
>Chose clown form to lure in kids
>Scares them through other means and forms etc.
>Shit on new it for not being scary

I don't get it.
Pennywise isn't supposed to be scary, people literally just decided for the fuck of it that he was, so why do people care about how the new one looks?

File: 1451012832953.jpg (53KB, 419x480px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 419x480px

>>87751204
>nu-It

File: IMG_0495.jpg (23KB, 436x436px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 436x436px

>>87751520
>implying they actually saw it

File: tumblr_inline_owb0cetbZk1tvub55_500.png (112KB, 500x314px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 500x314px

Can we maybe stop comparing the movie with the miniseries cuz the producers were trying to make the new IT as -different- from the 1990's one as possible, weren't they?

Who the fuck gives a shit about the clown? The kids totally made the show.

>the leader
>the smartmouth
>the fatass
>the hypochondriac
>the token black
>the fap bait
>the jew

I need more kid-shenanigans kino in my life.

>>87750301
Finn looks like hes overdosed on estrogen

no surprises there

>>87751204
>get it wrong
But every single human being not in autism spectrum liked the new one better, so we got it perfectly right. The new movie is just objetively better in every way including Pennywise, deal with it

>>87735802
The old one took something common and made it scary, the new one tried to make something scary and gave it a clown look.

I'd be more spooked if they just used Ronald McDonald.

>>87750301
why do they all have the exact same brand of underwear

wasn't the 80s supposed to be a capitalist paradise?

> tfw no scene where the kids run a train on the qt redhead

>>87751810
Stand By Me

File: we all flTHE FUCK STEVE BUSCEMI.jpg (124KB, 1049x800px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1049x800px

>>87739773
>>87739872
>>87739718

File: 1505239923484.png (569KB, 1376x1666px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 1376x1666px

>>87751700
>I don't get it.
I'll explain. We have 20 or 30 people on /tv/ who are unironical r+ddit rejects, as in they are redditors but their edgelord opinions are downvoted there, so they come here. They made fun of the movie before it came out, so now that it's released and we all know the movie is great, they have to do some damage control

Look at this >>87738320
All these people replying to that with "t-that can't be real!" are the same 4 or 5 guys in every thread. They can't let go because the BTFO they suffered is too big.

>>87751700

Because the new one is trying to be scary. It's an edgy creepy dirty monster clown that can barely speak. Compare the Georgie deaths. Currys was inviting and friendly, he talks like a human being, even getting Georgie to relax and laugh with him.

New Pennywise is some gurgling scooby doo voiced goblin. He's creepy when he shouldn't be creepy. The stranger danger fear doesn't work because theres no predatory undercurrent in the scene, pennywise isn't putting on an uncomfortable act to lure in Georgie. He's just dribbling through his lines like a fuckin monster from the get go.

>>87739718
>tfw not going to have a bf in my entire life

>>87739113
>It's way more effective when the monster looks a little more casual or natural
too bad thats not how King wrote it
go fuck yourself

>>87751810
>>the token black

I lolled hard when the other children called him "the homeschooled kid". It was the fucking 80s, he'd be lucky if they called him "the black kid" instead of "nigger"

>>87751920
>Compare the Georgie deaths.
Yeah let's do that because if my memory serves Curry doesn't kill anyone else in the miniseries. Nice """"""""scary""""" all-powerful clown you have there. And Georgie's scene is infinitely better in the new one so I think you have no argument

>>87751204
Tim Curry one had no "charm", that's literally your nostalgia speaking. He wasn't creepy, his scenes had no tension or suspense. He was just a guy dressed like a clown, acting like a normal guy until he'd randomly get angry and attack people, then go back to being normal. Nothing interesting or scary about that. Put it this way, if I saw Curry Pennywise at the side of the road I'd ignore him, if I saw the new one I'd run a mile

>>87751412
No, he looked like a regular guy dressed as a clown who needed to brush his teeth and fix himself some eyedrops. New Pennywise looks like an alien wearing a clown skin.

>>87751597
>his eyes become off-colour and menacing

Everyone parrots this, can you explain why exactly you found them menacing? They're slightly bloodshot. This means he hasn't been sleeping because he's a bum who works as a circus clown 24/7, or it means he got wasted the night before and needs hair of the dog. Do you find tired looking people scary? Lmao

>>87751920
He's creepy because he's an ancient spacemonster wearing human skin, if you think he should laugh and roll like a jolly old wiseguy then you're missing the point

Does anyone know if they have a stream of this movie yet?

>>87751818

The new one was better because of the kid actors and their story. Not because of fucking clown jump scares every seven minutes.

>>87751810
This. They made a supernatural adventure movie with horror elements instead of a pure horror movie. Nice move because horror is a dumpster fire of a genre

>>87739400
and the second one is exactly how hes in the book

>>87739567
>going for a normal clown look like the original pennywise
the original pennywise is fucking spooky unnatural monster with nothing natural you retard

>>87735802
Hey, it's you. That shill

>>87740048
>New pennywise had zero personality
>you dont believe in me, im not real enough for you? :(

adaptation of shitty stephen king book featuring tim curry as its only redeeming factor vs adaptation of shitty stephen king book: mom's gonna freak edition.

Movie:
>2017 > shit > 1990

Pennywise
Depends, I'm not a nostalgia faggot or a contrarionbro so I prefer the new one because it works better with the kid dynamics in the new one, but the old one is fine too

>>87741743
in the book he straight ou wants to murder them immediately, he doesnt play with them, that was a onetime thing only with Georgie
the few that were lucky and managed to survive and escape subsequently form the Losers Club

>>87738608
>>87744342
fuck off, in both the 2017 IT and in the book Pennywise tries to fucking kill them right off the bat, some kids just manage to get out with luck and survive, thus forming the Losers

Just watched it. It's spectacular. Fucking contrarians at it again, pretending like the mini series was better, it's nothing like this movie.

>>87738608
But 2017 tried to kill them all in the end?

>>87735802
Why I always see in 2017 horror bad guys trying to look scary by leaning their head forward and looking up at you while smiling

Who started this

>>87750344
I did the same thing but my friends didn't believe me.

What's the scariest part of the mini series? I don't want to watch the whole movie.

>>87752027
>Tim Curry one had no "charm", that's literally your nostalgia speaking. He wasn't creepy, his scenes had no tension or suspense. He was just a guy dressed like a clown, acting like a normal guy until he'd randomly get angry and attack people, then go back to being normal. Nothing interesting or scary about that. Put it this way, if I saw Curry Pennywise at the side of the road I'd ignore him, if I saw the new one I'd run a mile
But that's the whole point, dummy. He lured you into a false sense of security, then slowly turned on you and by the time you realized it it was too late.

The new Pennywise is literally just "herr derr I'm scary and now you're dead".

There's literally not one clown scene in this movie that I'll remember in a few months. But the 1990 scenes are still in my head (my fav is It starting off as Ben's dad, then slowly getting more and more clown decorations on him until he's finally It).

>>87735802
totally agree but oddly enough Pennywise sort of dragged the movie down.
Dont get me wrong Skarsgard was fucking great and its clear that he fits the role perfectly when he gets to talk. For example, his scene with Georgie is just as good as Curry's, and him talking to Bill even though it was brief in the Niebolt street house were fantastic moments. His attempt to just kill Bill and let th rest of the kids go worked too. But the problem is most of what we saw of Pennywise was him rushing at the camera, which would have worked if they didnt have him do it in an extremely predictable jump scare every 15 fucking minutes. It was fucking boring after the first three times.
The only part of the movie that was truly scary was honestly that weird painting lady Pennywise took the form of and its a shame we didnt get to see more shapeshifting.
So i can see it both ways between Curry and Skarsgard, both were pretty great. Curry gets an edge though because he was the best part of his respective film whereas Skarsgard was not.
On that note, literally every single other thing about the 2017 version is better and it is astonishing to me that people think otherwise. The scariest part of the 90's IT was that someone thought the acting was passable even for a fucking made for tv movie. The kids in 2017 were brilliant. Just everything else about the 90's tv movies were so fucking bad its not even fun to talk about.

>>87752450
Because it's made by a shitty director. It's great because of kids and the atmosphere, but as a horror movie it's very generic.

>>87751920

Missing the fucking point entirely. You're comparing a series that completely ignored the book and let Curry chew the fucking scenery because LOL HE'S THE ONLY SAVING ASPECT OF OUR TERRIBLE TV SERIES. He's supposed to look creepy, he's supposed to look hungry, that's why he's so desperate in the first scene. The book clearly described his eyes flashing a weird glow the first time Georgie sees him. The series completely ignored everything that hinted him being something else than a clown in a fucking sewer. In the movie you can even see him stumbling over some words and retorting to threats like "Bill's gonna kill you" when he sees that Georgie doesn't buy into his game. IT is supposed to look like a monster pretending to be wearing someone else's skin, not an inviting jolly clown. That's exactly why the scene worked, it had a sense of urgency and desperation with a gory and shocking payoff.

>>87752450
You also have to remember that the 1990 version was TV miniseries. There's no way they could do anything violent or shocking in that era of television.

>>87750615
Shining is a very good movie, but one of the shittiest adaptations

>>87752522
yeah. It was hyped up so much through the marketing like it was something truly special but in the end its just an above average horror flick with a monster

>>87741280
Well shit, I thought so too.

>>87752450
>On that note, literally every single other thing about the 2017 version is better and it is astonishing to me that people think otherwise
They don't, they are contrarianing for attention and cheap (you)s. I'd argue that Skasgard is better than Curry too

>>87752554
I dont think shocking violence is really important in determining that the remake is better.
Its not like its even that shocking anyway. we only sort of see Georgie get his arm ripped off, and we get a glimpse of Pennywise as the painting lady biting a kids face. 90% of the physical violence in the movie is directed at Pennywise anyway, I think Beverley stabs him right in the face two seperate times.

File: sophia_beverly.jpg (98KB, 1777x750px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1777x750px

>>87741598
i want to protect her smile

>>87749480
Yeah, a movie made in the 80s didn't go for 80s nostalgia, what a shocker.

It instead went for 50s nostalgia which was pretty much the same fucking thing, you colossal retard.

>>87741598
>Has teenage girl acting in his movie
>Makes her fall in love with him to get a good performance
Based Andres

>>87749480
>Old It just wasn't scary

fix'd

>>87738858
This

>>87752715
you totally missed the point.
They set it in the 80's so they could set part two in present day you fucking idiot.
How fucking stupid do you have to be to not notice that?

>>87752848
Yes, and it is a correct choice. Your point is?

>>87741018
>>87741598
90's Bev is pure, nu-Bev is a whore.

File: sophia lillis.jpg (68KB, 666x1000px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 666x1000px

>>87752889
false

>>87752871
if you understand the choice then you wouldnt be whining about nostalgia like a fucking idiot

>>87752635
>Its not like its even that shocking anyway. we only sort of see Georgie get his arm ripped off, and we get a glimpse of Pennywise as the painting lady biting a kids face.
That's what I'm talking about. They were able to use more violence, more blood, etc that the tv version couldn't do.
Unfortunately they also had more jump scares which are boring as fuck nowadays.

>>87740214
yes and the shining is good because it follows the book exactly

>>87752008
he kills the guard in the asylum and the bully in the sewers.

>>87752963
>Jump scares as a point of criticism

Fuck off with your reddit arguments.

>>87752444
this guy gets it

>THAT'S MY HOME NOW SON
creepy af.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (132KB, 1918x816px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1918x816px

>>87753290
shut the fuck up.

shit like pic related is 1000x more frightening (and memorable) then le scary reddit clown running at the camera with loud music to make you jump

Left tranny
Right man

File: 1491224708082.png (69KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1024x640px

>current year reddIT
>Literally cant count the "loud noise and le spoopy shaking, running-at-you" """""jumpscares"""" on one hand
>every scene with it is grimdark emo im so scary guize

Yeah, its shit.

>>87753371
>in the new version the clown kills itself at the end

>>87753341

>Le scary people walking past the background

>>87738722
2017 is worth a $5 matinee. Couple of jump scares. Shitty 80's background music to make it more 'authentic'. Could have ran another hour to build up the scares and not have the all the subplots punching you in the face.

>>87753549
>masked murderer watching you in plain sight in your own home but you never notice

don't look behind you

>>87736146
The lucky biscuits scene

>>87742163

>Dorky kids didn't say "fuck" all the time back in 1989 like online 12 yr old gamer ragers do today.

You couldn't be more wrong. I remember one conversation with my friends from that very year (granted, we were 9 and 10 rather than 12 and 13) where we were debating what exactly a blowjob was (didn't have internet back then and we were like fucking 9) and started inventing outlandish and impractical suggestions for what it could mean while laughing hysterically. The winning definition was sticking your dick in a bottle of liquor, setting it on fire, then having a girl blow it out like a candle.

>>87751327
she just looks bored

what a horrible show

>>87753341
what movie

>>87751204
>I could hardly understand What He was saying

This, his Scandi accent is retarded

>>87754022
The Strangers

>>87754022
The Incredible Hulk

>literally everyone loved the movie
>"W-WELL IT WAS ACTUALLY BAD BECAUSE [reddit buzzwords go here]
Name a worse board than /tv/, I'll wait

File: 59873439.png (819KB, 1280x1134px) Image search: [Google]

819KB, 1280x1134px

Hi /tv/

>>87753341

The irony here is that The Strangers is chock full of jump scares.

>>87742163
I was dorky and grew up in the late 80s. We cussed all the time. In fact we cussed constantly because it was still new and dirty to us. We also stole cigarettes from our parents (which made me puke), stashed porn in a clubhouse we built into a dirt wall near a creek, and touched our own weeners all the time in strict defiance of what they were telling us in Sunday school. We'd all lie about getting to touch boobs or having girlfriends. One time we found my friends dad's porn tapes. We found one unmarked one and threw that in the VCR and it wound up being a recording of his parents fucking.

>>87751204
did you watch 90's IT recently? even my gf who's scared easily saw the movie for the first time two weeks ago and laughed most of the time and meant that "well, maybe it was scary to kids in the early 90's".
it just isn't spooky. tim curry's pennywise is good for an afternoon watch for the little kids

>>87754495
I remember when I was 11 or 12, one of my best friends was this tom boy girl, and she started getting tits she let me play with them. Ah to go back to the days of youth.

I also stole my dads playboys and my friend had a dad who bought loads of porn vids so he'd steal one every now and then and we'd watch it when whoevers parents were out.

It's really blowing my mind that anyone found the miniseries scary or creepy.
You HAVE to be 5 years old

>>87754350
>drool
YES

>>87735932
Too bad that all they have to do is show literally anything but 2 hours of tv drama on screen during part 2, and this adaptation will be superior

>>87754580
Back in the day it was scary, but then again shit like Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street was also scary. Kids are desensitized so early now, that nothing is scary, and you can only really get people with jump scares now.

>>87754350
I want him to fuck me right now

>>87754350
*unzips dick*

File: clussy.png (570KB, 1280x1163px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1280x1163px

>>87754605
drool you say?

File: b2.png (154KB, 500x437px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 500x437px

>>87754605
>drool

>>87738320


OOO WAH AH AH AH

>>87752444
I prefer the build up of the sink and shower and especially Pennywise in the old Derry photo scenes vs. The Boo! IT's a Madea Halloween jump scares of the new version.

>>87754741
I want that sloppy tongue to violate my throat.

File: spider boy.png (328KB, 994x788px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 994x788px

Does...SPider have...Puss puss???

>>87736044
>you spend more time laughing and finding it comedic than being scared.

That's literally the 2017 movie as well though

It's always the difference between being scared i.e. elevated heartbeat, rapid breathing, shaking, and just being a bit frightened. Loud noises can be scary, but they're not necessarily horror. The overall mood of the movie matters more than any one scene on its own.

>>87754920

The mood of the new It is infinitely superior to the mini-series.

>>87753740
Saying "Fuck" was the mother of all bad words. You had Catholic guilt as a kid just saying it then. It was said too casually in IT. I was there too. We mostly said "shit", "asshole" or "son of a bitch" with a not to frequent use of "fuck you" or "fuck off" but the 2017 version the kids didn't use the word fuck as a dramatic exclamation. They used fuckin this and fuckin that, "fuck" as an adjective and it wasn't like that in 1989. The only time we said fuck a lot back then was when we were rapping along to nwa and even that felt weird too.

>>87754965
Wrong

>>87755013

The mini-series had no mood setting at all.

File: tumblr_ow8zzeUQpx1qg2koco2_1280.png (600KB, 1080x949px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 1080x949px

>>87754763
>teethies

>>87755021
the miniseries setting (to me) was Primetime 90s television

I want to P O P pennywise's clussy

>>87749587
Fucking this. Modern parents in a nutshell.

File: pennycry.gif (3MB, 540x280px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 540x280px

This is what he looks like after I ravage his holes and beat him into the ground

>>87755021
Wron . Also, le grimdark edgy xD isnt a valid mood setting.

>>87755222

Just saying wrong doesn't mean anything. The series never tried to set anything and Pennywise just showed up randomly.

You're just a contrarian retard.

>>87754969

Different kids, different experiences. Probably didn't help that we were in a Navy town, though.

File: 1505034264585.gif (2MB, 656x368px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 656x368px

>>87755040
And eyeroll.

File: 1504756456386.jpg (74KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x640px

>>87755275
>Just saying wrong doesn't mean anything.

>Just says that Nu-It "had a mood setting"
Rly making me think

>U contrarian!! Stop not liking IT (tm)2017!! Omg!!
Lol ur a faggot

>>87755418

Cool facebook memes. Really activated the almonds on that one.

Kill yourself.

>>87755475
>no argument
>"facebook memes"
>copying "rly makes me think"

First few days here? Go back to facebook

>>87755527

You literally haven't presented an argument besides "wrong"

Again, kill yourself.

File: 1504732256202.jpg (32KB, 434x466px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 434x466px

>There are people unironically defending Millenial Emo It

The absolute STATE of this board

File: 1504238121907.jpg (160KB, 760x430px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 760x430px

>>87755556
>doesn't present an argument
>expects an argument

Oh, so youre retarded? Got it

>He's literally still posting despite not having an argument

This brainlet doesn't seem to understand that he has a claim and can't back it up.

>>87755021
Yeah. It wasn't all greyscale and pretentious like the 2017 version. I'm literally watching the 90's version right now. 30 minutes into it, no dick jokes, better character development (I already care for the characters, flashbacks has that Godfather Part II feel to it). I couldn't even tell the kids names apart until an hour into the 2017 version. No edgy violence, still the point gets across. 1990's Bev doesn't smoke an edgy cig, she's pure and more likable from the get go. Curry is so alpha as Pennywise. 1990's IT is KingKino

>>87755732

Willing to bet this anon hasn't even seen the new movie.

There was no characterization for any of the characters in the mini series.

File: bdze8eyu6yly.jpg (56KB, 803x737px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 803x737px

>>87755760
>I-I bet y-you didn't even watch it!
>Nu-uh!

It was then that you realize Nu-It defenders are literally underage brainlets.

When did it all go wrong, /tv/? Was it capeshit that turned everyone into retards or maybe the first Spoopy Jittery-Running meme monsters? What happened to decent horror films? I cant even name the last decent one ive seen.

>He's still replying

No argument nostalgia fags everyone!

>>87755851
>Literally nothing of value:The post
Why are Burgerlards so dumb? Or is it just shills?

>Literally STILL posting

God, this tard is so pathetic.

>>87755901
Its underage fags that love kids that are like themselves. These people look up to the cast in the movie and wish they were like them and their friends. So yes mostly burgers.

>>87755901
Americans were a mistake

File: 1504786205427.png (177KB, 592x574px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 592x574px

>>87755901
>>87755963
>>87755977

>>87755822
>capeshit turned everyone into retards
literally this. same kiddy faggots who think babadook is shit, yet annabelle: creation is a masterpiece.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fxXmVybL8Y

What amazing kino! How could the new film hope to compete with such amazing scenes like this!

>>87755822
>literally underage brainlets.

>unironically defedning a crappy mini series from the nineties just to be contrarian

stephen king is just capeshit of the literary world

>>87756212
>contrarian

Theresthatwordagain.jpg

>>87756262

Are you new here?

>>87756298
The irony of this post is palpable. Lurk more

>>87756315

Are you really going to try and dispute that 90% of /tv/ isn't hivemind contrarian?

>>87756413
I see you didnt understand the meme I posted. Keeo digging that hole, newfag.

>>87735932

1990 :

>No budget, no CGI, bad FX

2017 :

>Welcome CGI