Greatest Directors of All Time

lmao who are any of these nerds

File: nanook_3.jpg (507KB, 960x700px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 960x700px

>>87663188
dem bro, v patrish

>>87664753
>nanook
*guffaws

>>87663188
>look how hipster and contrarian I am
Fuck off. Don't you have some troubled girl with blue hair that plays the accordion to chat up?

>>87663188
>>87664773
>no frank borzage
>no henry king
>no john s robertson
>no dw griffith
>no erich von stroheim
>no clarence brown
>no joe may
>no jean renoir
>no marcel l'herbier
whats the point then, really?

>look at all these no name faggots my teacher is obsessed about at film school

Yeah, I'm sure they're great if you love identifying yourself as the contrarian goth kids from south park

File: Birth of a Nation Miriam Cooper extreme closeup.jpg (15KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 320x240px

>>87665077
>frank borzage
no studio hacks allowed
>no henry king
no studio hacks allowed
>no dw Griffith
check again, verifiably not Hollywood
>no erich von Stroheim
check again, verifiably not Hollywood
>no Clarence brown
no studio hacks allowed
>no joe may
no studio hacks allowed
>no jean Renoir
added nothing of worth to medium, all traits already accounted for here >>87663188
>no marcel l'herbier
added nothing to the medium, all traits accounted for here >>87663188

>>87665397
>lowercase posting
im not reading the piece of shit you just posted, git gud lazy faggot

>>87665876
nice try, kiddo
*sneers

>>87663188
>anti-TSPDT list
>almost all of these directors have films on TSPDT list
What did he mean by this?

File: you can't see it but I'm laughing tears.png (47KB, 808x654px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 808x654px

>>87665972
>almost all of these directors have films on TSPDT list

>>87663188
>white men

>>87666021
I don't know about current version, but in the past there were at least three Flaherty's movies there: Nanook, Man of Aran and Louisiana Story.

TSPDT definitely lists films of Stroheim, Griffith, Flaherty and Murnau. I don't know about other, but for example Lederer was more famous as a screenwriter than a director.

File: flaherty biggest pleb filter.png (61KB, 680x458px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 680x458px

>>87666295
The point isn't the question of whether Flaherty is mentioned, lummox. I won't baby you if you can't add 2+2

>>87663188
you're so mysterious OP

>>87665397
>no Eisenstein, Bresson, Godard

File: bresson is shit.png (32KB, 748x156px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 748x156px

>>87667911
>Eisenstein
adding nothing new and if anything is the biggest pleb-indicator. His style is all about manipulation with shoddy propagandistic content. When you watch Eisenstein, you are taken through explicit actions and forced by his images to feel particular ways. There is no profundity or complexity. If you want (proper)dynamism revisit here >>87663188

>Bresson
pic-related
>Godard
I shouldn't even be taking you seriously, but no nothing new. All he did was apply silent techniques to sound and filmed staged fiction with the guise of documentary (see Karl Brown and Flaherty)

>jews
Opinion discarded

>>87668407
Griffith exposed the jews on multiple accounts

>>87668458
Then why include Jews in the list?

>all these butthurt ledditors itt
lmao

>>87668497
Uh-oh. Point out the jews.

>>87668577
>"von" Stroheim
>DeMille
>Strand
>Murnau (homosexual pedophile - basically a Jew)

Wow he actually did it.
*giggles

>>87668271
>When you watch Eisenstein, you are taken through explicit actions and forced by his images to feel particular ways.
Well, in Griffith's case you are forced by his intertitles, but for some reason you love his preaching.

File: wise words from griffith -.png (183KB, 645x479px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 645x479px

>>87669225

>>87663188
>all dead white men

Lmao get real

>>87669455
>white men
Lmao

>>87669455
>>87668407

the irony in that you managed to make this the worst thread on tv

gj

>>87671174
wahhhh I hate boring old shit!!