ITT: pleb red flags

>>87662650
Oh look, another stupid faggot frogposter. Just what we need.

File: 1384618252376.jpg (58KB, 397x388px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 397x388px

>People who say ''Film is supposed to be entertainment!''
>People who have 2001, Seven Samurai, Citizen Kane, other pleb shit on their top lists
>People who have seen 1 film made before the 50s and think they have taste
>People who like Wes Anderson and think they somehow have taste
>People with most movies on list made in last 20 years
>People who have no foreign language movies listed
>People who think korean cinema is good
>People who have movies from Nolan, Tarantino, Aronofsky, Kubrick, Refn, Snyder on their list
>People who have any comic book movie listed
>People who say comfy/based

>>87662650
Oh look, another stupid faggot frogposter. Just what we need.

>complain about the pacing.

File: 1374129727452.jpg (54KB, 484x480px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 484x480px

>>87662650
>"it's good"
>can't elaborate on what makes it good
Every time. How can you form an opinion without even know what makes the opinion hold true?

File: 1489085877822.jpg (92KB, 638x479px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 638x479px

HOW TO SPOT A PLEB 101

>only able to discuss literal plot points and the logical order of the narrative of a film
>every film has a singular universal "deep meaning" which you have to "get" to understand it
>"The writing is the most important filmmaking element!"
>thinks that empty pretty pictures means "good cinematography"
>"I don't find this part of the narrative plausible or realistic, therefore the movie is SHIT!"
>treating a film like a puzzle which you have to put together in a certain kind of way to get it
>a film is either utter dogshit or a masterpiece, there is no inbetween
>"Who cares about editing, framing and composition sound and whatnot if the story isn't great."
>considers heavy use of direct symbolism as a positive factor
>using "boring" and "nothing happens" as arguments ever

>>87662730
why not tho?
you dont have to name all the different spices and cooking processes that went into a meal to know if it tastes good or not.

>>87662781
>treating a film like a puzzle which you have to put together in a certain kind of way to get it
head on over to Twin Peaks general and weep.

>>87662670
>>87662705
Oh look another stupid faggot Oh look, another stupid faggot frogposter. Just what we needposter

>>87662804
>sees food he's never tasted before
>"it tastes good"
>gets asked how he can know it tastes good if he never tasted it
>"I think it looks good, so it must taste good"
Also:
>junk food tastes good
>therefor it's good food that deserves acclaim for no other reason than it tastes good
You describe mere consumption, but there's more to film than that.

>>87662690

>Dumping Kubrick with Tarantino and Nolan
CEASE

File: 1434277122843.jpg (298KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1462x1462px

>>87662690
>having a list
>caring about lists
yikes

>>87662804
That's not a good analogy.
You're only saying that you like that food, not that is objectively good. Someone could literally eat shit and think it tastes good.

File: image.jpg (36KB, 508x524px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 508x524px

>>87662953
Who cares

>>87663134
Objectively good doesn't exist, silly modernist.

File: 1490599347802.jpg (98KB, 1456x896px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1456x896px

>>87662650
>says he browses /tv/

>>87662781
>The writing is the most important filmmaking element
This is fact. Cinematography, good acting and great sound composition won't matter if the script is shit. Sounds like you're the pleb.

>>87663187
Ofcourse the ultimate objectivity doesn’t exost, but I'm pretty sure the general consensus of eating literal shit would be that it is disgusting.

File: 1489502089179.jpg (65KB, 728x546px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 728x546px

>>87663187
Subjectivists deserve the rope

>>87663321
Film is a visual medium, narrative is only one element so you are factualy wrong.
Fury Road, Sicario, Dunkirk all have a bad/mediocre story, but because of all the quality of other elements they resulted in good/great movies.

Even most Tarkovsky films have a pretty simple script if you take it just as a story, but because of his great non linear poetry-like execution they are considered as one of the best films ever made.