The original script included the gangbang scene

What is the point of viewing a film if it doesn't challenge your current perspective?

>>87660615
This. IT still turned out ok, but I could have been great. Too bad Hollywood won't take any risks anymore.

>>87660518
>>87660660
An underage gangbang would not have improved the film at all you sick fuck

>>87660518
Needed the movie to be more disturbing. It was still to cookie cutter and didn't push the edge. Well made but it needed more to be terrifying. Jump scares aren't scary if you're older than 13

File: 1264645711862.jpg (32KB, 269x261px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 269x261px

classic fukunaga

What's scary about a kid raping a sheep? Or jerking off on a birthday cake? Sounds like Fuckanigga just had some weird fetishes he wanted to film.

>>87660518
That would've been so dark and grisly and perfect.

I read the script. There was no such scene. Only what's described in the OP.

Honestly, the movie was better. Fukunaga's version is way too tryhard with the "disturbing" sex elements.

>>87660518
The original script didn't have the gangbang you fucking retard. Everyone has read it

>>87660615

People don't want to watch anything uncomfortable or actually scary that'll stick with them. They want temporary BOO spooks.

>>87660698
What's the point of a horror movie if it doesn't challenge you and make you a bit disturbed?

>>87660711
Agree.

So sad since it had so much potential. It's an ok (even good) movie don't get me wrong, but it's not great. It would have been great if it had been more disturbing.

>>87660518
I read the original script and there's no "masturbating sheep" scene, there's only the naked woman in the jewish thing

It could have been made offscreen

>>87660518
I can get the sheep and the cake thing but those other 2 are perfect for haunting the audience

>>87660518
Everything except the raping of a sheep and masturbating in a cake was pure kino.