Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
For those who don't like remakes 2017-09-12 02:14:56 Post No. 87628221
[Report] Image search: [Google]
For those who don't like remakes 2017-09-12 02:14:56 Post No. 87628221
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: movie-remakes.jpg (49KB, 620x350px) Image search:
[Google]
49KB, 620x350px
>Ben-Hur (1959) is a remake of Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ (1925)
>John Carpenter's The Thing (1982) is a remake of The Thing from Another World (1951)
>The Fly (1986) is a remake of The Fly (1958)
>Scarface (1983) is a remake of Scarface (1932)
>The Departed (2006) is a remake of Internal Affairs (2002)
>>
>>87628221
And?
>>
>>87628221
remakes run hollyjewd.
they were and will be made.
people just act up strange.
>>
>>87628221
They remade films all the time back then. The Desert Song was remade like four times.
>>
>>87628221
None of that is true. If it were true I would have heard about it before. I don't accept UNSOURCED, ANONYMOUS, FAKE NEWS.
>>
>>87628221
I can acknowledge a handful of good remakes here and there while still thinking the sheer volume of remakes we get is ridiculous
>>
>>87628324
more than half of people dont know a shit about pre WW2 movies, so well
>>
>>87628221
>runs out of examples
>throws Departed in there
how about Seven Samurai/Mag7/Mag7?
or Mutiny on the Bounty/Mutiny on the Bounty/The Bounty?
>>
>>87628221
>most of those listed were 30+ years ago
>one of the remakes was from a talented oscar winning director
Thats cheating and you know it
>>
>>87628221
1932 Scarface is the tits. way more kino than Pacino screaming through every scene fucked on coke
>>
>>87628221
That's one good film every 24.3 year average
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1