Reminder.......

Because he completely changed everything about King's story and characters. The movie is a poor adaption of the book, i'd be pissed to.

>>87560584
The book was shit, if anything Kubrick made it better

File: Lawnmower_man_poster.jpg (1MB, 1959x2977px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1959x2977px

The only way to make a decent movie from any of Stephen King's works is to completely deviate from the source material.

>>87560584
>Because he completely improved everything within King's story and characters. The movie surpasses the book and makes King look like a total hack, i'd be pissed too.
FTFY

Reminder that The Shining was good as it was, because Kubrick deviated from King's shitty novel and actually made it something interesting.

>>87560691
This. Stephen King wrote a shitload of books, and very few of them are even decent. Interesting basic ideas for a lot of them, but you have to change everything except for the basic idea if you want a good movie.

Kubrick made it into pseudo intellectual nonsense with a retarded ending.

>>87560927
So like.. any Stephen King novel

..ya'll excited for mr Mercedes?

>>87560540
Bathtub lady was better in this one tho, damn she gave me nightmares as a kid

>>87560991
not you Doland.

>>87560927
>I don't like it, therefore it's pseudo-intellectual
grow up

>>87560540
It would be very difficult to cast a 5 year old protagonist in a role that would traumatize them for life.