$15 + tip to see this fucking garbage LMAOOOO
>>87538845
walked out at this part
>>87538845
I like it
$15?
Sorry I can wait to DL the 50 GB bluray .iso like a real alpha
What did you tip for
>>87539118
The usher for the showers.
Counter-shilling is more cancerous than fanboyism. We get it, you're mad this film is successful, when you were laughing for months about "how bad it's going to be." We get it, saying it's shit makes you feel smart. We get it, even though you post in an anonymous imageboard you feel the neurotic need to justify your previous posts asserting that the film is shit even though it's economically successful.
Jesus Christ, just move on. The actual shilling is already bad to begin with. Yes, we know the movie is bad, but we don't need to be reminded of it 5 times a day. For the sake of this board's necrotic quality it has left, make a thread for a good film instead, and ignore this shit.
>>87539118
the buffet attendant
>>87538845
>tfw 11 dollars for ticket and twizzlers
>local theatre runs slideshow ads for a local stable, and then a crazy CGI aftereffects ad for a birthday magician
>twizzlers aren't even stale
>>87538928
Nah, your social anxiety ridden ass stayed in it's seat.
>>87538845
This movie only cost $35 million to make when Ghostbusters 2016 cost $144 million.
For a movie that cheap, it has decent CGI and was made very well.
Now comparing this to Ghostbusters, It has way better visuals
> $7 a ticket
>target right next door
>sneak in m&ms
>empty matinee
> $1 coke zeros
I love smaller town theaters, my gf and I can watch a movie in an empty theater for less than $20.
>>87540635
The CGI was the worst part. I actually liked everything else about the movie but the CGI was so bad it ruined it for me. Whenever It was chasing anything around he basically looked like someone in an online game when they're lagging.