She carried the whole movie with her impeccable genes.
TALK ABOUT THE 80s VERSION NOT THE NEW VERSION SCUM
>>87486313
cruel cruel woman
>>87486342
I'm not watching old shit faggot.
>>87486313
eh i wish they went full retard with the thing universe like they did with alien, by making like the thing vs superman, or the thing vs king kong
thats the shlock id watch
>>87486438
>making lovecraftian horror CAPESHIT...
what the fuck is wrong with you?
>>87486532
it doesnt fucking delete the original masterpiece from history you stupid nigger
cant you separate various things in your life from eachother?
or did shit prequels of star wars ruin your childhood too you fucking negroid subhuman?
>>87487432
I'm not saying the original is bad. I'm saying that I don't like old movie aesthetics like that. The actors look like shit.
>people think you're trolling when you claim the thing's intentions and modus operandi make the most sense in the prequel of the remake
Wait, there ate women in The Thing!?
>>87487902
Goddamn you sound like a madsive faggot. Back to your capeshit and cgi shitfests.
>>87486313
She could carry my genes if you know what I mean.
>>87488149
Fuck you faggot. Old timey women < Ashkenazi bred actors
>>87486313
reminder that this girl was also supercute and not in the movie enough
>Impeccable genes
>Not white and has a wonky eye
You must be an absolute fucking wreck, OP. I suggest you remove yourself from life.
>>87486385
Jesus fucking christ
>>87486313
>Impeccable genes
>Melting-faced Ramona
>>87488149
There are no women in the original Thing
>>87486532
leave capeshit to me
>>87488818
>Implying Wilford Brimley isn't a FtM transgendered walrus otherkin
>>87486342
I get to see the 80s version in the theater in a few weeks and I unironically enjoy 2011 as well, as an entertaining and serviceable (if obviously inferior) companion piece. :^)
Mary Elizabeth Winstead is a poor actress.
>>87488787
Who is this hot girl?
>>87488818
The chess computer is voiced by a woman.
Also (read between the lines, I'm not using this next item to attempt to refute you as I did above, it's just an interesting related observation), the flying-saucer practical model used in the opening sequence was built by a woman.
>>87488898
That actually sounds about right when you take a look at final-form Blair-thing.
>>87488818
I should've waited and not simpy written about 1982, and instead have pointed out that there's like 1-2 women in the real original film, they are even fairly prominent in the plot, although only as radio gals/girls friday/love interests.
The original short story probably has the best claim to the total absence of a (human) female presence, although now that I think of it, they have a small number of /cows/ on the base. Vaginas, vaginas everywhere, ruining it--
>make a shitton of animatronic and cool make up stuff
>change everything to shitty CGI post production
>>87486385
underage B&
>>87488898
Any porn of this?
>>87486313
>
ForMEW
>>87486313
gross
>>87486342
The new version has a better ending.
>>87491386
The original version has a better beginning