Kill Bill

>>87449951
Isn't that information in the title?

>>87450011
It's not Killed Bill

Tarantino did that in Pulp Fiction too when we see Bruce willis blow away Travolta.

File: anteater3.jpg (202KB, 1100x700px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1100x700px

You're a fucking retard

>>87449951
It's not about the destination, it's about the journey.

>>87450011
>Not memorizing each shot from both films
I'm talking specifically about Kill Bill: Volume 1, you uncultured Swine! You rotten scoundrel!

I think the "Vol. 1" part of "Kill Bill Vol. 1" spoiled that.

"KILL BILL VOLUME 1"
>Bill will be killed
>this is the first volume, there will be another
Yeah gee, what a spoiler that she isn't killed in the O-Ren fight

Imagine being able to watch these films again without a reference for the music used.

The soundtrack was everywhere for years.

>tfw no alternative cut of both movies where the story is shown chronologically

>>87449951
>the end boss dies
You mean the mid boss? Kill Bill is supposed to be viewed as one movie.

>>87450171
DID SOMEBODY SAY..?!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDGVVYnB5g

>>87450291
>Actually following the word and lore of Quentin Autistino
Remove yourself from existence

>>87450310
KINO

>>87450338
Did he actually confirm it?
I always said that because the two movies put together actually form a more traditional and cohesive narrative arc.

>>87449951
It's not the destination, but the journey.

>careing about spoilers

>>87450338
Quentin AutistKino

>implying the brilliant sequence and tension from the moment B walks into the House of Blue Leaves didn't suck you in and make you forget

File: 1465889304003.png (359KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 700x700px

If she only kills Bill in the second one, remind me why I need to watch the first one again?

>>87450691

You don't. Just skip to the last five minutes of the second film.

>>87450772
This is how I watch all movies. Why waste time when you can just jump to the important part?

>>87450641
Epic

>>87450772
>>87450843
i hope you guys are watching at 10x speed too, otherwise your watch is wasted. there's nine other movies you could fit into those other 9 minutes

>>87450843
Truly the best way to watch your kino

I can't believe there are """"people"""" out there that are too stupid for Tarantula of all things

>just because she crosses a name off her list, that means you know she killed them unambiguously

no

>>87450691
>>87450772
>>87450843
>>87451049
I unironically believe that there is in fact zero (0) point in watching any of Tarantino's """"films"""".

>>87451049

I unironically watch most movies on 2x speed and only slow down for kino. I have over 2000 confirmed watches and am kind of a movie expert.

*tips*

>>87451295
men of culture still browse this board

I know you guys are just joking about watching films at a faster speed, but I really do. I watch my films at x1.25 speed because at that pace the dialogue is still understandable and the movement of the actors isn't uncanny valley tier. I only slow down for intelligent films like Inception so I can absorb and grasp the information

>>87451457
>I only slow down for intelligent films like Inception so I can absorb and grasp the information

i give you the benefit of the doubt and this is how you repay me

File: 1495744556604.png (27KB, 741x609px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 741x609px

>Shakespeare ruined Romeo and Juliet by spoiling it at the beginning


BRAVO SHAKESPEARE

>>87451167
Same but about every film ever