What are some examples of the remake being better than the original?
>>87446045
The "original" was a tv miniseries starring several people in wigs, OP. It's not really that much of an achievement doing something better with an actual feature budget
The Thing. 80s remake is way better than 50s original.
Unironically
The original was great for its time but really if you just look at it as a normal movie and not the first of its genre then its basic shit, the rob zombie one atleast has some character development and shit. And the killing moments are a billion times better but well its obvious with vfx and cgi being more modern
>>87446684
>cgi being more modern
The original had no CGI, you retard.
>>87446767
My point still stands
>>87446826
nope
>>87446861
Nostalgiafaggot
>>87446317
The fact that a TV miniseries even got to the level of recognition of an actual film is already impressive
>>87446826
>The CGI was more modern
>Original Halloween had no CGI
No it doesn't, because you're comparing an element that does exist to an element that doesn't
>>87446684
>>87446877
The remake is objectively worse in every aspect. Only edgy teens and people with severe mental issues fail to see this.
>>87446045
PAID MARKETERS GET OFF MY /tv/
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>87446045
Not this one.
>>87446981
>The remake is objectively worse in every aspect.
Micheal Myers himself is better. So are the gurls, and it looks better. It has a nice dirty look that rob zombie movies have, and it fits.
>>87446879
It's LITERALLY all thanks to Tim Curry memeing his performance as IT.
>>87446045
Coen Brothers True Grit
>>87446879
Not really. It just scared a bunch of kids in the 90s, and now they're old enough to remember it as better than it actually was because it made an impression.
better than original
>>87446105
I was about to scream, then I realized I saw the black and white one back in 95. You're right.
If you want to call it a remake.