.

>>87390437
homecoming looked great for a smartphone game

Promotional photo v youtube screen cap
Dawn of cherry picking

based spongebob references ftw

>>87394166
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRhRZB-nqOU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MilZYig-SXo

If you unironically think that the second video is in any way better than the first one, you probably have brain damage.

>>87394296
considering it's fucking cammed you goddamn mongoloid

also I can cherry pick too https://youtu.be/aJscQ8LYgM0?t=23s

File: RAIMI.png (618KB, 1813x953px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 1813x953px

>>87394296
>>87394418
Forgot the image

>>87394470
is this literally a ps2 cutscene?

>>87394166
Rekt

>>87394501
No, it's from true kino Spider-man (2002) raimi different time tobey back gib

File: 111.jpg (63KB, 250x323px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 250x323px

>>87394418
Holy shit

File: lol.png (754KB, 1351x745px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 1351x745px

>>87394418
>>87394470
>>87394501
>>87394632
The CGI in Homecoming looks like utter shit for a movie from 2017. Spider-Man is a 15 year old movie and it's normal for it to look dated.

>>87394709
You got btfo and have to resort to "IT'S OLD IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE BAD!". Back to formula, Raimi.

>>87394774
The CGI in the original Spider-Man looked great for its time. Spider-Man 2 even won an Oscar for best visual effects.

The CGI in Homecoming looks fake as shit for a movie from 2017. Same goes for Spider-Man's suit in Civil War.

>>87394892
dude it was a different time lmao hah it was always shit

>>87394914
Stay mad, MCUck. Raimi's trilogy will be remembered for a long time, while Homecoming and its sequels will be forgotten in no time just like every generic piece of trash Marvel puts out these days.

>>87394980
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPN1BvR02Xo

top quality

is low key lighting impossible with CGI or something?

it seems like low key lighting is the easiest way to tell if a shot is real or fake

>>87390437
The raimi spiderman was way more realistic because they didn't use CGI every fucking time. Homecoming spider-man is basically a Green lantern CGI type of shit.

>>87395032
Tobey's mannerisms and over-the-top acting made that scene genuinely funny, unlike Tom Holland's constant quipping.

>>87395032
Why don't people like the cringe Peter scenes again? They're top notch.

>>87395102
There's about the same ratio of CGI. Spider-man was one of the first frequent abusers of CGI, basically anytime he's climbing, swinging or doing anything really. You seriously should re watch the movies.

File: spider-man-movie-screencaps.com-13528.jpg (283KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1920x1040px

>>87390437
Good point, bad thing that the picture is shit, would be better with usage of real screenshots.

>>87394166
Reality vs. Shitty CGI

>>87395102
This. The first one especially used CGI very sparingly.

Also, Danny Elfman's soundtrack is god-tier.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuVU2AEse_g

>>87395102
It's worse than Green Lantern because:

1) There was no reason to use CGI (they only used it because the actual costume looks like shit), while Green Lantern's costume, with that design anyway, had to use CGI
2) A lot of the time Spider-Man seemed to be entirely animated, not just effects over the real thing, and not just during action sequences. Green Lantern's movements were much more organic.

File: WE_WUZ.jpg (118KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1200x900px

>>87390437

>>87394914
Dude, it *was* a different time. They were still trying to make money from good the movies were instead of making it from doing everything on the cheap and pocketing chunks of the budget.

>>87395249
>very sparingly

No. I saw it in the theater, and the level of CGI in action scenes was unbearable when compared to the previous norms.

>>87395755
from *how good

>>87395755
born in the wrong generation amirite man lmao?

File: capekino.png (2MB, 1920x1036px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1036px

>>87395780
Of course there were scenes where the use of CGI was inevitable. But it was used in moderation. Did you even see the video I posted?

Maybe you need to rewatch it. And put on some glasses this time around, grandpa.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfSz0bQzZuM

>>87390437
1. different lighting because of the time of day
2. Sam Raimi is a talented chap
Now go cherrypick more screenshots, cockwad.

LMAOing @ the amount of buttblasted MCUckolds in this thread

Homecoming is still the best Spider-man movie.

>>87396939
but muh cgi special olympics!!

>>87395653
WE

File: back-in-my-day.jpg (13KB, 234x260px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 234x260px

>>87394709
>MUH CHILDHOOD

>>87396939
Nah, that would objectively be Spider-Man 2. Perfect casting, coherent plot, Peter struggling to live a fulfilling life while maintaining his two completely different personas, a compelling villain, distinct and memorable characters, great cinematography, great action sequences and I could keep going.

If you fail to recognize that, then you have an extremely shitty taste.

>>87390437
do people care about man of spiders this much?

>>87390437
What did you expect? That one director said that Disney didn't want HIM to make a movie, just follow their cookie cutter, focus grouped sterile template.

MCU IS TRASH

*breathes in*

The Sam Raimi movies are utter trash.
The new one was too Avengers-y, but at least I wasn't expected to believe a 30 year old man was a high school student.

>>87399833
Men used to look like men at the age of 15

>>87397390
>MUH ANYTHING I DONT LIKE IS NOSTALGIA

>>87399893

that might've been true in 1940, which is always the fucking style Raimi tries to ape for his movies, no matter how much it ruins scenes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NbZ3tagi54
Daily reminder

>>87394166
>>87394418
>>87394470
>>87394501
>>87394511
>>87394561
>>87394632
>>87394774
>>87394914
>>87395032
>>87395208
>>87395461
>>87396006
>>87396939
>>87397014
>>87397390
>>87399833
>>87399929
>>87399929
>>87399936
Why is this board full of people with shitty taste in movies?

>>87390437
The Raimi screenshot looks like one of those pre-rendered CGI cutscenes from a late 90s PC game

>>87400040
why do you accept shitty adaptations of simple source material?
do you also like game of thrones?

>>87400040
Ask yourself.

I want to fuck Tom Holland.

File: 115560.1.jpg (139KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 900x600px

Reminder del taco did pic related in 2008 with had the budget of homecoming(85 million dollars)

>>87400236

how about you post what the fucking army of CGI robots from the movie looks like

>>87400236

Half the budget*

>>87400066
Get your eyesight checked, garndpa.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7EZ-CBVgF8

File: images (20).jpg (26KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 512x288px

>>87400286

Literally better than any mook army in capeshit today. Does anyone even give a fuck about art direction anymore? Look how shit the chitauri and the parademons look compared to this.

File: hb81.jpg (250KB, 1200x649px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1200x649px

>>87400368

They still look better desu.