Obviously, I'll start
Severus Snape
>complete fucking loner
>finally meets cool gril
>gets put in different house than friend
>loses best/only friend
>gets picked on
>lives this until he becomes a teacher
>best friend dies to some fuck
>he can't save her
>lives next several years making sure her kid is ok
>eventually has to go deep undercover to save friend's kid; does bad shit
>has to kill only other friend to save the kid
>has to die to save the kid
>everyone hated him except potter (the kid) when he found out the whole story
Sad? Excuse me, but he chose to be a a masochist cuckold that ended up watching over his ex-childhood love's husband's son who also starred in easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>spent years undercover with the most vicious gangs in america
>develops various addictions, neuroses and trauma working with the carteles and others
>watched his daughter die in front of his eyes
>wife abandoned him due to the stress of losing their child
>finds himself in the middle of a satanic pedophile cult investigation
>his only friend is a philandering piece of shit
>>87333438
Obviously Dale.
>>87333907
He also had a war veteran father and didnt even watch tv until hes 17 i believe
>>87333907
Rusts change was flawed.
Ultimately the only thing that made him hopeful again was "feeling" the presence of his daughter in a near death experience. He was saved by his understandable edgy persona by a miracle or a hallucination.
Had that never happened, he would've been a depressed, nihilistic person for the rest of his life.
>>87334032
>not having access to TV is considered a "hard life"
>>87333438
>incel beta who pined over his oneitis who was married to and banged her highschool Chad and so you start bullying her son because you could never have her and hated his father but deep down you wanted to fuck that kid because his eyes were just like your highschool crush's
I can't imagine depths of cuckery beyond this.
>>87333690
You should review movies, I'm being dead serious