Tarantino hatred thread

File: 1503512219619.png (1MB, 900x1449px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x1449px

>>87313382
Pulp Fiction
Hateful Eight
Django Unchained
Reservoir Dogs
True Romance

Some of the greatest films of all time.

>>87313382
I don't hate his movies or work, I genuinely think the guy has his style and signature on making stuff.
What I do find retarded is his fanbase though.
It's as autistic and cringeworthy as rick and morty, got, twin peaks and kubrick ones.
Dunno if I made my point clear, most of this stuff can be fun, watchable, even good sometimes, but when faggots go full retard mode acting like it's the greatest thing humanity ever produced in more than 15000 years oh history... that's something worth hating.
TLDR: yeah, Tarantino fanboys and normie fanboys are faggots.

File: ANGRY PEPE.png (307KB, 600x545px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 600x545px

>>87313507
all of these films a literal turds that scoot by by being memes.

Take pulp fiction for example. There's nobody i care about in the whole film and i certainly dont care to watch what happen to any of them

OMG SAMUEL L. NIGNOG JUST SAID MUTHFUCKA LELELELEL

ROYALE WITH CHEEEEEEEESE?

POINTLESS DANCING SCENE AND UMA THIRMAN IN GENERAL. O'D YOU BITH LIKE I GIVE A FUUUUUUCK

POINTLESS NON-LINEAR STORYTELLING. WHAT DOES IT EVEN IMPART?

SOMEONE SAID NIGGAR LEL 2EDGY4U

WOAH SUPER VIOLENT!

GAY RAPE! WOAH LOOKOUT SOMEONE SAID NIGGARS AGAIN WOAHHAHAHAH

>>87313916
>x is a meme argument
>caps lock shouting

>>87313957
NO MEME ARGUMENTS HERE AND WTF IS WRONG WITH CAPITALISING FOR EMPHASIS?

>>87313382
WE ALL HATE HIM

>>87313382
I don't need you tell how good my movies are okaaay? I'm the one who watches them.

>>87313382
watched a couple of scenes from inglorious basterds on youtube after not having seen it in years and it's absolutely pathetic

File: 1498690428040.jpg (3MB, 1816x5276px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1816x5276px

>>87314378
>>87314224
>>87314100
>>87313916
>>87313382
Tarantino is patrician because he triggers plebbitors like you.

File: 14453526565790.jpg (7KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x241px

>>87313507
>Hateful Eight
>Django Unchained
>Some of the greatest films of all time.

>>87313916
The thing that fills me with seething hatred the most is whenever a fucker think he is super smart or cool when he recites by heart the Ezekiel tirade.
Makes me want to set them on fire just to have a reason so piss on them afterwards.

>>87314378
I had to sit through with all my friends. they were behaving as though they were watching a masterpiece and i was wanting to gouge my eyes out from the boredom. I just wanted all the characters to burn to death in the cinema by the end. Waltz is a shitty actor too.

File: MV5BMTcyNDA4Nzk3N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDYzMjMxMw@@._V1_UX214_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg (12KB, 214x317px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 214x317px

marty does the same thing with old movies but his movies are great

I appreciate Tarantino, but I feel the same way about him as I do PTA. I just don't like their movies for some reason.

>>87313382
>>87313916
>Literally no actual arguments
Shocker. You idiots pretend to hate his movies literally to just be contrarians

File: 1504322947149.jpg (124KB, 571x618px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 571x618px

>>87314478
That is the most pathetic "patrician" selection i have ever seen. Half that shit is reddit/plebeian standard and it doesn't have "Chinatown" or "L.A. confidential" on it. You have failed.

>>87313916
I know this is probably bait, but I know there are wankers that are actually like this, so I'll try to let you know why I enjoyed the film and hopefully you'll at least walk away with a bit of an understanding:

It had nothing to do with "dead nigger storage" or any of the "edgier" lines, it was the cool persona. Everyone had their own different persona of cool. He skips making them complete humans to make them cool aspects of different humans. The hard gangster bible quoter - his quotes were relevant and great to hear in the moment. Two high assholes 50s dancing with serious looks on their faces and giving us some sex to an otherwise sexless era. The soldier that has no manners around children, but at least he's honest. The boxer on the motorcycle. The black guy that walks into a very openly racist shop with guns despite knowing what they are.

These are all examples of cool. They do not make a full person, nowhere close, but they don't need to. Resonating with these people on an empathetic level was never the point. You were supposed to walk away seeing the different faces of cool that only cinema can bring.

File: northwest.jpg (276KB, 1325x1000px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1325x1000px

>>87314693
all those things i listed are flaws gaping wider than your mothers busted pussy/asshole region. Address one and get back to me faggit

>>87313382
You have to go back buddy.

>>87314784
I promise i'm not baiting. I have hated Tarantino ever since i was pointed towards pulp fiction as a good film. Since then i have watched his status amongst the normies rise to truly gigamemetic levels and alwys wondered why.

I think you've certainly hit the nail on the head with the coolness being the appeal but i just don't find any of it cool. its just a bunch of assholes acting like complete twats

>>87315086
Okay then. I'm glad we both understand each other. I'd still watch movies with you, anon, even if we both like different things.

>>87314597
Oh god pal you aint joking. Some of the most alienating experiences i have ever had with people involve that shit. never fails to trigger instant contempt for somebody

File: this is what cool looks like in a movie.jpg (122KB, 1351x577px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1351x577px

>>87315210
Nah i'm bloody awful to watch films with. Cant keep my mouth shut if i don't like it, either that or i just have to leave them room cos the cringe is too real. Pic related is J.J Gittes, the ultimate example of cool on the screen. Samuel L. Jigaboo shouting and John fagvolta with greasy hair are NOT cool

>>87315580
>implying we aren't all insufferable and talkative while watching movies
One day we'll watch and riff together.

>>87313766
name me a better director

>I didn't go to film school, I went to films.
Seriously though, I don't care. All of his films are solid entertainment. I don't know how he does it, but they're always a good way to spend two hours.

I'm not a fanboy and I know nothing about his supposed retarded fanbase. All I know is that I've enjoyed every single one of his films and I can't say that about many directors.

>>87313507
Hateful Eight and Django are both heaping piles of DOGSHIT, and I don't mind QT flicks.

>>87313382
Explain Kill Bill then.

>>87315975
Django have one most kino shootout of last 20 years though

All of his fans think they're so unique for liking him, when really, he is the only director they know by name

>>87316215
lol you can't be serious

>>87315975
>Dude contrarianism lmao

>>87316061
Which part? the disjointed narrative? the overlong painfully drawn out dialogue? the scenes/tropes/themes ripped straight from superior original films? the unlikable protagonist? the pointless second volume? which part anon?

I'll give you the final swordfight from KB 1 as a good standalone fight scene but waiting through the whole film just to get to it? No way

>>87316431
I like all his other films, those two are absolute trash, sorry you have to go back to school tomorrow lil guy.

>>87313916
Yeah Pulp Fiction's pretty bad but Reservoir Dogs makes up for it. Jackie Brown is also good but like most of his other things are just rehashes of his favorite exploitation films.

File: 1504015267321.jpg (15KB, 232x206px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 232x206px

>>87316431
underage

File: bastards.jpg (888KB, 1241x1894px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 1241x1894px

>>87314378
>>87314615
rather watch the original

I find his films to edgy for me, I dont enjoy watching a film glorify sociopaths and unlikable characters.

Most his films protagonists have no redeeming qualities which make it difficult to relate to.

>>87318915
>thinking you have redeeming qualities
>not a sociopath

>>87315975
we get it dude you browse /tv/

>>87319175
rebbit

>>87315580

You really are one pathetic loser. Grow up kid and maybe you'll understand why people love him so much. Till then, keep it down because your mom and dad are trying to sleep upstairs.

>>87313916
fucking relax

The problem with Tarantino is only that now we are getting familiar with his style, his tropes, the things he's been studying for and mimicking for years. It's not so fun watching events unfold anymore now that we know there is absolutely going to be a Mexican standoff, ponderous one sided dialogues, some kind of revenge plot, gratuitous violence, etc. Hateful eight was interesting but felt like it was 50% just shit Tarantino feels obliged to do.

OP, he's the 90's hipster "indie" version of Spielberg; a sperg who's only knowledge of the world comes from movies and that's reflected in the types of films they make.

Spielberg likes to think of himself as an artist but the truth is that he's nothing more that a craftsman who takes even the most complex issues/characters (Schindler's List/Munich) and reduces them to simple ideas and so that his feeble mind can comprehend them. But he'll never make a holocaust drama feel as real as The Pianist nor a political thriller such as The Battle of Algiers.

QT is even worse in that he's incapable of doing anything that comes near to reality and has no variety to his work. It's all allusions to exploitation and pop culture references. He makes race hate films like Inglorious Basterds and Django Unchained so that he can ride the fence of saying what he really feels about Jews and Blacks but at the same time covers for it by letting the protagonists get violent revenge against their oppressors.

He also never deals with relationships or sex because he's a grotesque mongoloid who never got laid before becoming a Director without paying for it. So he's an autistic who doesn't and will never understand human being which is why his movies are cartoons.

Don't get me wrong, Pulp Fiction/Kill Bill Vol. 1 and IB are masterpiece's and I love them, PF being the most iconic movie of the 90's, but they're simple entertainment with no deeper meaning!!!FACT!!! https://youtu.be/GxLR_VaWkMM

>>87320242
Just to add to this, I wrote two articles, one about why movies/entertainment sucks these days and Pulp Fiction's impact on cinema in the 90's, the other about why Spielberg sucks shit. Read them if you like, or don't and see if I give a fuck!!!FACT!!!

http://thesupernaughts.com/columns/fact/why-does-modern-cinemaentertainment-suckfact/

http://thesupernaughts.com/columns/fact/fuck-steven-spielbergfact/

>>87314652
Scorsese is the difference between someone who is INFLUENCED by something and someone like QT or Brian DePalma (the latter is admittedly my favorite Director) who just outright rips shit off. Neither of those two Directors will ever do anything as profound as Taxi Driver or Raging Bull!!!FACT!!!

>>87314655
PTA is even fucking worse than QT. Every movie PTA makes is meant to be a version of someone else's film, for example....

Hard Eight = Sidney Lumet
Boogie Nights = Martin Scorsese
Magnolia = Robert Altman
Punch Drunk Love = Hal Ashby
There Will Be Blood = Terrence Malick
Inherent Vice = Altman again and obviously meant to be his own The Long Goodbye which was also about a shambling private detective.

No, QT has PF/KB1/IB and although I really enjoy Boogie Nights it has the same problem as all of PTA's movies; his characters fall into two categories -the cool calm sage or the blithering idiot with no in between!!!FACT!!!

>>87320673
Scorsese is shit without Schrader

>>87321032
PF was just a mashup of reservoir dogs and his other exploitation film influences.

>>87320039
Come up with an actual argument Tarantino fag. I've put up several and all you can do to defend your plebeian tastes is try to seem more grown up than me. Did you ever consider that liking rehashed parts of good movies with a heavy dose of pointless ultraviolence and bad language means you have the taste of a 12 year old?

>>87316061
>Explain Kill Bill then.

Kill Bill Vol. 1 is a near masterpiece. The problem is that the Weinstein Jews got greedy and wanted two movies while that gargoyle didn't want to cut anything. If you edited a shit load out of Vol. 2 and merged it with the first movie you'd have a great film. I wish QT had fucked with audiences and at the end of KB1 and went meta; during the credits showed an editor working on the final shot and saying that part 2 was never made because the Director died while jerking off in Tokyo to hentai tentacle porn just before the films release and as a result. Subvert expectations and don't provide an ending to the story because there was soo much build up that the "Five Finger Exploding Heart technique" was shit and anti-climactic!!!FACT!!!

>>87316492
>Jackie Brown

QT only made that shit because he was beholden to Elmore Leonard whose novels are filled with characters talking about random shit. The problem with his books is that they're meandering and why most of the movies based on them sucked with Out of Sight>Get Shorty>Jackie Brown being the best although that's faint praise!!!FACT!!!

>>87321893
Jackie Brown is a masterpiece, it's just less of a Tarantino masterpiece. Reservoir>JB>etc>the exploitation knockoffs kill bill/inglourious/django with deathproof being the better of them, probably.

>>87321076
True enough but I think it was also the era (1970's) that helped. Scorsese couldn't nor wouldn't make movies like that today despite having all the resources to do so. So he makes big budget glossy flicks to keep his bank account flush. Can't hate him for it though as Tax Driver/Raging Bull/Goodfellas has earned him his legacy. I also FUCKING LOVED The Wolf of Wall Street as it felt like "don't give a fuck" Scorsese!!!FACT!!!

File: IMG_0629.gif (2MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x360px

>>87313382
Okay, anon !! QT is hyper mashed up mediums director. The point you made as the rip off isn't that obvious compare to some that came out recently, contains the sequence after sequence just looke a like its preceders. On the 2nd to pinpoint this, the filmmaking itself go more than 100 years of history. That makes it hard for the originality to come out. They all have the tendency to sounds & look alike. A about another complain on the goons having chitchat is that you need to know the difference between a character explaining the plot & a character showing inner character through the conversation. Keep those in your mind & go over his early efforts especially. The really are marvelously done, updating what director like Martin Scorsese did in the past.

File: image.jpg (15KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 200x200px

Pleb: Tarantino
Patrician: Kitano

>>87321129
Yeah but the structure made it feel revolutionary at the time. Maybe you don't know or remember but in the early 90's cinema was stagnating with nothing but big budget shit from the major studios. PF was a low budget movie that embraced it's R-rating, right when political correctness was starting to take hold, and blew peoples minds by essentially bringing Vincent Vega back from the dead just by changing the order that the stories were told. It made people say to themselves "WOAH, you can do that with movies?!?". I'm serious that it blew the doors off and made it feel like anything was possible. Without PF there is no Trainspotting, no Boogie Nights, no Fight Club etc... It's one of the reasons why 1999-2000 was a great time for movies with the usual influx of big budget popcorn and a ton of films that took chances like Being John Malcovitch, Fight Club, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, The Matrix, American Psycho, Requiem for a Dream, The Blair With Project, The Sixth Sense etc...

Of course it all came to an end but if you want a really great education on the subject, read Peter Biskind's 'Down and Dirty Pictures' that details the 90's "indie" scene which was dominated by Miramax, the Sundance film festival and New Line Cinema to a lesser extent. A GREAT book and a close second to his masterpiece 'Easy Riders, Raging Bulls' which is my favorite book of all time and details how the 1970's became the greatest era in north America cinema history and how it ended. Oh and if you want a good overview of cinema from its inception to the era when that book starts, go and by the 7 hour TCM doc "Moguls and Movie Stars" which is a fantastic!!!FACT!!!

>>87322828
That is a silly comment, in the late-80s/early-90s PG13 wasn't even solidified. By the time pulp fiction released shit like trainspotting and boogie nights were already in production. I'm not gonna deny Miramax started a big move towards the indie-er pictures but they weren't alone.

I dunno why they shifted to lower budget films but I would imagine spielberg and the 80s stars were just asking for too much after their successes.

File: IMG_0651.jpg (39KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 396x382px

>>87313507

>>87314842
>uhhh it's memes and people who annoy me like them!
that's not an actual criticism kid

>>87313916
calm your autism

File: ufugginfaggots.jpg (106KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1280x720px

>>87323390
Harvey Kietel is doing insurance adverts in the UK featuring that Wolf guy. They run during the day time for old grannies and kids to watch. PF is shit, tarantino is shit, and (you) are shit

File: Shaft_among_british_front.jpg (20KB, 200x316px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 200x316px

>>87322059
>Jackie Brown is a masterpiece

I think it's self indulgent and boring. It's a 2.5 hour movie that should have been 90 minutes. Felt like QT was trying too hard to bring another actors career back from the dead which is ironic since Pam Grier has a supporting role in Mars Attacks the year before and undercut the whole endeavor.

To be fair, how do you follow up Pulp Fiction? That movie captured the zeitgeist of the time like no other film of that decade. Shifting down gear wasn't a bad idea but it would have been better if he could have subverted expectations and delivered something like LA Confidential which was arguably the best film of 1997

It's funny that Rum Punch was the only novel he ever adapted. Seems Directors like QT and Kevin Smith have a bit of pretentiousness about them in that they don't like adapting other peoples work because it makes them feel less like an "artist". BULLSHIT!!! Scorsese, Cronenberg etc... have all made great movies based on material from other sources.

I mention this because I remember thinking back in the late 90's about how desperately I wanted QT to adapt Shaft Among the Jews which was one of the Shaft novels by Ernest Tidyman that was never made into a movie.

He should have did that, set it in the 70's and released it in 2000 instead of that fuck awful remake!!!FACT!!!

>>87323752
>that non sequitur
enjoy your brain damage

File: George MacDonald Fraser.jpg (14KB, 228x332px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 228x332px

>>87313507
>>87313957
>>87315026
>>87315664
>>87316061
>>87316215
>>87316431
>>87320039
>>87320135
>>87322828
>>87323390
>>87323710

>mfw when this shit plays:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQirllj_0QA

>>87323861
Pulp Fiction was shifting down from reservoir dogs. Tarantino wrote good stuff when he wasn't just taking it from 70s movies instead. His portion of Four Rooms is some of his best work, the intro to rodriguez' dusk til dawn? Masterful.

Jackie Brown was Tarantino sitting back and actually looking at his style. The soundtrack and how it plays out through the film, which takes have that extra shot of just sitting still and not being spastic ADD shit. That was refinement of what he tried to do in pulp fiction. He had his IDEAL cast, not because they were his childhood favorites or huge names but because they fit perfectly. It was just a coming together of what tarantino is good at in a style he knows better than anyone and without having to one-up his own shit or dumb-down his writing to reach exploitation levels.

File: 29XYmgE.gif (2MB, 450x345px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x345px

>>87323169
>By the time pulp fiction released shit like trainspotting and boogie nights were already in production.

You know nothing and I'll explain why.

Pulp Fiction began shooting in sept 1993. It was shown at the Canne film festival in May of 1994 and released in Oct of that year.

Trainspotting didn't start shooting until mid-1995. Boogie Nights wasn't shot until late 1996-early 1997.

So, your version of "reality" is wrong, furthermore, this comment you made...

> in the late-80s/early-90s PG13 wasn't even solidified

Shows just how fucking little you know and understand even less. The PG-13 rating was implemented in 1984 with Red Dawn being the first film to have it.

Finally, this statement you made...

>I dunno why they shifted to lower budget films but I would imagine spielberg and the 80s stars were just asking for too much after their successes.

Proves that you're not a total fucking retard, so bravo, I golf clap in your general direction!!!FACT!!!

>>87324401
>What is preproduction?

>PG13 implemented in 1984
>Not standardized til into the 90s
look at some 80s PG movies sometime, an 80s PG13 is like a 2000s R. The lines got drawn over the course of a decade or so though.

>>87324210
I disagree. It felt self conscious and I've read that he was hesitant to make another movie after PF because of its acclaim. Jackie Brown doesn't feel organic, it seems like QT trying to down shift while still being self-indulgent. Kill Bill Vol. 1 feels like the movie that he should have made after PF because it arguably tops it!!!FACT!!!

>>87314750
you responded to a bait picture, good job retard.

>>87313382
I can watch pulp, basterds, j brown, django, reservoir dogs. The rest was garbage shit a hack would make.
I can't figure out how he got a pass with dead nigger storage. He sure like to say nigger a lot. Where is all the outrage over that?

>>87324518
>>What is preproduction?

*sigh* PULP FICTION WAS RELEASED IN OCT OF 1994 AND PRE-PRODUCTION OF TRAINSPOTTING WOULDN'T HAVE LASTED FROM BEFORE THAT TIME TO MID 1995 WHEN IT STARTED SHOOTING!!! A LOW BUDGET MOVIE LIKE TRAINSPOTTING DOESN'T HAVE TEN FUCKING MONTHS OF PRE-PRODUCTIN YOU FUCKING KNOB!!!

ALSO....

>Not standardized til into the 90s

IT WAS IMPLIMENTED AND PUT ON MOVIES STARTING IN 1984 WITH RED DAWN, AND EVERY MOVIE IT WAS GRANTED TO FROM THERE ON OUT FOR FUCK SAKES, HOW MUCH MORE FUCKING CLEAR DO I HAVE TO BE YOU BLITHERING CUNT?!? CAN'T WAIT UNTIL SCHOOL STARTS TOMORROW AND YOU WORTHLESS CUMSTAINS AREN'T HERE TO SHITPOST, FUCKING FAGGOT!!!FACT!!!

>>87324683
Well yeah QT was CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED to go jackie brown but he still got his pick of project. And yeah I can see self-indulgent coming from exactly the same things I like about it, the refinement and the precision in some parts of it might come off that way.

I think Kill Bill was just awful. It just flushed all the successes he had down the toilet and moved into gratuitous. Jackie Brown was minimal-tarantino in a very tarantino genre that he had proven himself in. Kill Bill is just letting the fucker off the chain, where he's already decided he wants to be Rodriguez when he grows up and just make completely outlandish stuff that hit his nostalgia buttons. I think Deathproof is really his best work in that style, too. Even though it's almost universally hated the women&cars&revenge sort of film is definitely right up his alley and the over the top parts are interspersed with the really slow dialogue-heavy buildup that made a lot of his older films work well.

>>87324909
Preproduction takes like 2-3 years on most projects. The ratings stuff were again completely arbitrary and nonsensical until the mid-90s. In the 80s R only got attached to super violent/sexual/gorefest films and PG13 was for anything else no matter how brief the ultraviolence/sex was. PG13's in 99 would have still been PG before 1990. It wasn't a universally applied standardized set of rules.

File: 1407460548619.png (83KB, 212x218px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 212x218px

>!!!FACT!!!

>>87313382
His only film that didn't suck ass was pulp-fiction but that's because it didn't take itself seriously and the acting was great. This guy sucks at making movies

>>87313382
>when you've become so woke about film that all your friends have been alienated and you are unable to enjoy light entertainment without throwing an autism fit on an imageboard

is being so edgy really worth it

>>87318984
nice strawman pal

>>87313916
This post just made me a Tarantino fan. Fucking contrarians are so autistic.

>>87313382
>Tarantino
>derivative
Nice spotting.

>>87313916
Christ.

You think you're smart, but you failed to grasp a fucking Tarantino movie.
Your "critique" is derivative of you literally being unable to grasp what the fuck is spelled out in front of your two damn eyes.

>>87313382
Totally agree oppie, good post

>>87313507
All forgettable theatre filler, just fodder for casuals shovel down their gullets.

>>87325244
Just filter the tripfag and you won't have this problem.

File: 1453324302775.png (703KB, 956x714px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 956x714px

>>87313382
>NO!
every time

File: 1498240185391.jpg (35KB, 438x750px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 438x750px

>>87313507
>Some of the greatest films of all time
Said no one, ever
Pulp Fiction - OK
Hateful Eight-total shit
Django Unchained-unwatchable
Reservoir Dogs-tryhard
True Romance-Ok
Can't believe you didn't bring up After Midnight, that shit with the swordfights, or that other grindhouse shit.