you're the only well written character with a progression that makes sense in 8 shitty movies
>tfw
Draco could have just AK'd Harry at any point in the series, he was just too much of a cuck to do it.
Wouldn't even kill Dumbledore after that first year house cup fiasco, shameful display to be quite honest.
>>87230353
Did you even watch the ninth movie?
Draco teleports back in time and also reverses his age, AKd's Harry Pot and Ron Measly and every single member at Hogwarts except for Slytherin pure bloods and his half breed waifu Hermione Gregor. Draco then literally AKd's every single non pure blood and human and falls in love with Hermione, of course they were always in love but now more in love. Draco becomes the hero Voldemort never could have even dreamed to be and makes England a magic power house. Next stop It's every other European country and then they'll team up with honorary pure blood in Japan and South Korea taking over America.
>>87230353
Do you even into Bongistan? Guns are illegal there, let alone an AK
Truly a fine example of a movie franchises written for people whose imaginative lives are confined to TV cartoons, and the exaggerated (more exciting, not threatening) mirror-worlds of soaps, reality TV and celebrity gossip. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>87231662
This fucking copy pasta always makes me laugh.
>>87231509
>Guns are illegal there
Yea, tell that to Vernon