Will it be shit?

Yes but not as shit as Discovery.

>>87209557
What up reddit.

File: 456456.png (913KB, 1296x794px) Image search: [Google]

913KB, 1296x794px

>>87209233

Is that their miniature set? It looks so tacky and amateur compared to TNG

>>87209557
this turd has better peanuts than that turd

>>87209233
+ inspired by trek
+ positive vision of our future
+ relying on practical effects/models
+ orchestral theme + score
+ not behind paywall

- cheesy immature humor
- some people really dislike seth

Here's the theme:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VwFaKtsC4Y

>>87209233
I'm predicting it'll end up having 1 or 2 good episodes that really feel like good Star Trek and the rest of it will be over-saturated with the kind of weird riffing humour that McFarlane is so into.

>>87209917
Star Trek Discovery:

+ first official Trek show since enterprise
+ will be on netflix

- visually resembles JJ's Trek
- dark & Gritty
- dated cgi
- klingons that don't look like klingons
- forced diversity
- behind paywall

>>87209233

Is that really the best shape they could come up with for the nacelles?

>>87209695
STD doesn't even use a scaled model

>>87209695
>minature
>is huge
??

>>87209917
>- cheesy immature humor

Thats always been a part of Trek to be fair

>>87209233

>we no longer have to fear the banana

My hopes are low.

#1 reason why discovery will fail
>acronym for the show is STD

File: 1403390116320s.jpg (2KB, 125x119px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x119px

>>87210106
>STD

Everytime I read that

>>87210113
If you look really closely you can see that that model is in fact not a Kilometer long space ship and therefor is considered miniature.

>>87210113
Compared to the actual size of the enterprise it's miniature. Ironically the larger the miniature is the better the effect.

I'm wondering if they're going to be constantly using the "funny flashbacks"

>>87210245
>t. someone who only saw Family Guy

>>87209233

Looks like it could be pretty cool

>>87210245
>SHIELDS AT 15%, WE'RE TAKING HEAVY DAMAGE ON ALL DECKS
>JESUS CHRIST I HAVEN'T TAKEN A BEATING LIKE THIS SINCE THAT TIME I WAS IN THE ACADEMY

>>87210245
he's starring in the show, not directing the show

>>87210245
>>87210338

If the jokes are decent and it helps build the lore I would ultimately be okay with this.

>>87210432
This, flashbacks aren't in themselves bad, in Family Guy they were just unfunny filler in an already unfunny show

>>87210624
yes they are. It implies they are so shit at story telling they need to break everything up.

>>87209233
Cool starship design.

>>87209917
>Another white washed cast.

>>87209233
I have high hopes for this show. It could go either way but it looks amazing.

>>87211214
Would that be a pro or a con?

>>87209233
What? What the fuck is that? Is that a space ship? Why would they design it that way? What retard thought that looked good? So many questions.

Im starting to worry this might be more Star Trek than the actual upcoming Discovery Star Trek :(

>>87210134
Orville will be pee pee poo poo humor.

File: v71n2cxmtetabmsha4ue[1].jpg (69KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 800x450px

i prefer the original.

>>87213497
It won't. It'll just be full of MacFarlane toilet humor.

>>87213815
Best Star Trek.