Godard

>good
uhhh... godard was once a maoist who championed the murderous ideology of mao zedong and the khmer rouge. we condemn griffith and riefenstahl of their political sins, but griffith serioiusly tried to prove he was not a hater after 'birth of a nation'. and riefenstahl insisted she loathed nazism but had simply done as told. maybe they were full of shit but at least they tried to publicly distance themselves from extreme politics.

not godard who espoused the most extreme, murderous, and destructive form of leftism. film scholars, so outraged about long dead griffith and long irrelevant riefenstahl, never demanded of godard to face up to his past sins. unlike kurosawa and bergman who candidly confessed their cowardice in face or approval of, respectively, japanese militarism and nazism, godard has never ever apologized in general, or in specific to the countless victims of the tyrants he supported with all his heart.

godard celebrated and championed mao's total destruction of culture and intellectual life and the khmer rouge that transformed camodia overnight into a genocidal stone age marxist state. fuck that piece of shit.

File: Wild.Strawberries.1957.Criterion.Collection.BD-Rip.720p-WiKi_00:19:25.413.jpg (214KB, 948x720px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 948x720px

>>87201032
>stale pasta
But what did Bergman have to be apologetic about in regards to his work?

>>87201188
>>87200994
>criterion

lmao watch post 68 godard in 35mm if you want your taste to evolve