is this movie good /tv/ or is it just whiny pretentious bullshit?

>>87160108
Well if subverting tropes and expectations is pretentious to you then probably not worth watching for you

>>87160108
can it be both?

File: 1468973823727.jpg (408KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 800x800px

>>87160108
Michael Pitt is my husbando

wait wait...is that the same guy that played Jimmy Darmody in Boardwalk Empire?

>>87161182
it can be taken as beating you over the head with the whole
>why are you watching an innocent family get brutally murdered
>violence is what you wanted right???
>whose side are you on??

>>87161361
Yeah it is a bit heavy-handed but still worth watching just for that one scene

Go to /pol/ ad laugh at the snuff webms. basically the same thing.

like all michael haneke films it is extremely well made and absurdly preachy

>>87161182
Why can't I just see it as an average home invasion movie?

>>87161834
>all
you haven't seen more than two

>>87162917
i've only yet to see armour

>>87161834
I wouldn't call most Haneke films preachy at all. Having a theme isn't the same as preaching it. He does go a little bit too far and obvious sometimes though.

>>87162967
It's boring.

>>87160108
pretentious shit is an understatement, this movie is pathetic and Haneke is a disgusting hack