how to become a famous movie director without talent or motivation?

>>87158951
You know (((how)))

money

I'll just do my own amateur flicks maybe one day someone will like them

File: 1474358150489.png (124KB, 354x504px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 354x504px

>>87158982

>>87158951
it isn't in your control. free will doesn't exist so either it will happen in the future or it won't. you can't do anything to change that.

>>87158951
Best way is to not be experimental. Do everything by the books and general movie conventions

>>87158951

You can't do anything without motivation, I should know.

As for talent, well there's the Brett Ratner types who know enough about directing to get steady gigs and made it to studio features and stayed there by being yes men, that's probably the route you want to take if you have no innate talent or vision.

>>87159076
At least it is true that man has no control; even over his own will

>>87159107
this, just copy and paste directly from frogposting cliche threads

>>87158951
get picked to direct a marvel movie

>>87158951
Is your family megarich?

>>87159076
>>87159155
Utter bullshit. The human brain can approach an entirely arbitrary object in arbitrary space, and understand it. That is free will.

>>87158951
without motivation can't. With no talent, can. Look at Ed Wood. He had no talent, considered one of worst directors of all time (well, Uwe Boll is close 2nd) and still was famous enough that in 90s they made biopic starring Johnny Depp.

>>87159222
>The human brain can approach an entirely arbitrary object in arbitrary space, and understand it.
trying to sound smart but failing hard. use technical terms if you're going to try to prove free will. you're just using terms you made up yourself, "arbitrary space" lmao

>>87158951
Be jewish or a woman

>>87158951
Talent isn't something you can say you have unless someone else has said you have it. You can't do jack shit without motivation.

need money/((connections)) for a shitty remake
need talent to make something interesting
kind of need at least some motivation to do either

>>87159428
A spec of dust picked off of a table with the tip of your finger is an arbitrary object sitting on an arbitrary object picked out from arbitrary space. No "AI" exists than can do this, and yet the brain can trivially.

>>87159867
>fine motor skills proves free will
how dumb do you have to be to think that is a good argument

>>87159222
nothing on this planet or in 3 dimensions is truly arbitrary in the sense that would make this true. (even if someone did intetpret a 5D structure in another unicerse, they'd still have their DNA as a precondition.) you're equating free will with omniscience, or only omniscience can lead to free will--with which I would agree

>>87159867
>No "AI" exists than can do this, and yet the brain can trivially.
top kek
computers can recognize dust in images. scientists use image recognition for objects of much more granularity. the only limitation of it grabbing the dust is the fine robotics, which is besides the point

>>87158951
Just be yourself

>>87159428
Kill yourself.

>>87160216
No AI exists that can be given an arbitrary object and know what to do with it. All current AI is simply trained neural networks, with predefined guidelines and restricted use-cases. AI doesn't actually exist in the sense of a brain - a neural network trained on images of dust is not an AI.

File: Hack.jpg (254KB, 1600x1141px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 1600x1141px

[spoiled]worship Moloch[/spoiler]

>>87160348
this might come as a surprise to you but there is no right way to handle any object. just because humans haven't yet built an ai that handle objects like humans want them to doesn't shed light on anything about free will

File: NhAR3QY.png (121KB, 1548x1468px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1548x1468px

>>87158951
simply follow this handy guide

>>87159076
determinism isn't an excuse to be lazy

>>87159764
>kind of need at least some motivation to do either
this, if you have no desire to make the movie why would you even bother?
Even the laziest schlock director sought out a script, producers to invest in their product, and hired actors or a casting director to do it for them.
That takes a least a little bit of effort.

>>87159222
Ït's that time of day when people redefine free will to be contrarian

1. Be Jewish
2. Have Jewish hollywood connections
3. ?????
4. Profit

>>87158982
fpbp