Why no biopic? He's one of their own.

>>87074900
>dubs
>you know why

Bill O'Reilly made that laughable shit-tier Killing Reagan last year. Made for TV schlock.

File: will-ferrell-playing-ronald-reagan.jpg (215KB, 670x377px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 670x377px

>>87074900
Was gonna happen, but conservicucks started foaming at the mouth
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/28/entertainment/will-ferrell-ronald-reagan-movie/index.html

>>87075055
the original snowflakes at it again

>>87075055
Will Ferrell is a terrible casting choice. Tommy Lee Jones is probably the safest bet. I assume you are just going to do his presidential terms, the tensions with Russia, etc.

>>87074900
There are already many Alzheimers documentaries.

>>87075089
Yeah because we didn't want another W and Reagan deserves more respect than doing some shitty satire, you know, the ones Clinton or Obama will never get in a million years?

>>87074900
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1723808/

You're welcome

>>87075125
>from the director of Soul Surfer
That's not at all what I wanted!

>>87075122
Reagan deserves nothing more than shitty satire. He's a clown.

>>87075186
>He's a clown.
Under Reaganomics, 16 million new jobs were created.

>>87075203
Do you have a single fact to back that up?

>>87075275
https://www.thebalance.com/job-creation-by-president-by-number-and-percent-3863218
>Reagan added 15.9 million jobs during his eight-year term, a 17.6 percent increase. There were 106.9 million people working in December 1988 compared to 91 million in December 1980.

>>87075094
>Reagan: Charismatic, known to pop a joke into most situations
>TLJ: Literally incapable of humor
I love based Tommy, but c'mon
>>87075122
>Regan deserves more respect than doing some shitty satire, you know, the ones Clinton or Obama will never get in a million years?
Clinton got made fun of in Animaniacs in nearly every episode, m8, and SNL got plenty of licks in. I'll give you Barry O, tho. Closest thing I've seen to making a joke about him was It's Always Sunny

>>87075122
>Reagan
>Deserves respect
fucking lmao

Reagan was a fucking piece of human trash

>>87075310
Beat by clinton and obama lol

>>87075313
He's an actor man it can be done. TLJ is fucking HILARIOUS in Men in Black. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSZe-DM_o6I

Also I'm with you about Clinton getting mocked regularly (The Simpsons, Larry Sanders Show, Animaniacs, etc) but nobody has touched Obama besides The Boondocks. NOBODY

>>87075367
Well I can see where your stake is in this argument.

>>87075368
>nobody has touched Obama besides The Boondocks
I thought it was weird how they made him the neighbor and gave him a white wife.

>>87075380
Just shows "Reaganomics" didn't do shit and he created jobs because of the business cycle. Meanwhile it's very easy to list off all the failures Reagan is responsible for.

>>87075483
The dude had Alzheimer's while in office. Show some respect.

>>87075483
Many economists argue that the economic surplus during Clinton's presidential term was afterglow due to Reagan's deregulation and the end of the Cold War. And also because Clinton slashed defense spending.
http://www.economonitor.com/blog/2013/04/should-reagan-get-credit-for-bill-clintons-budget-surplus/

Hes a Republican after Lincoln so nope.

>>87075620
explain Nixon and W please.

>>87075310
That's great, but how about a source that's not a glorified blog? Can't find one? Is it because every serious source will tell you that Reagan tripled the national debt and continuously overspent the Federal Budget funds?
And that's only his economic achievements. I'm not gonna start about how he openly supported at least two genocides and disappeared so far up his ass vetoing the South African sanctions, that both parties agreed to shut him down.

>>87075569
Nice link retard. The only thing it shows is that Reagan overspent on defense

>>87075653
Peace through strength motherfucker. Soviet Union would have postured another ten years if Reagan didn't take a hard line and make the tough choices.

>>87075722
Again, your own blog talks about how the Soviet Union was collapsing under its own mismanagement and negotiation was what caused it to open up. Do you read your own links?

>people who claim to hate globalism are defending reagan
Don't learn politics from youtube talking heads you dumb contrarian kiddos

The idea that Reagan was a good president is the biggest fucking meme that needs to end.

>>87075653
>okay you evil conservative prove your hate speech is true
>Hah! Nice source bigot that's not Colbert.

Every time.

>>87075653
ok, but what was so bad about apartheid?

>>87075905
>le epic keep them niggers down post
>I'm not /pol/ I swear!

ebin, simply ebin

File: Teddy Roosevelt.png (226KB, 550x566px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 550x566px

Fuck that. Where's the Teddy Roosevelt biopic?

>>87076068
You realize that South Africa's infrastructure has only gotten worse since apartheid ended? and that it's still the country with one of the highest concentrations of "baby rape"?

>>87075089
shitlibs not understanding what "snowflake" means again

>>87074900
Unironically one of the worst presidents with one of the most corrupt administrations. His time in the whitehouse delivered the mortal blow to working class households.

>>87075829
>Every single source that I agree with is always right and all the rest are wrong and obviously owned by jews.
Have you even read the shit source? It's clickbait-tier garbage with articles like "How to get rich before 40 in 10 easy steps". Provide me with something decent, and I may reconsider my stance on Reagan.
Before you start screaming "well how about YOU provide some source, huh", - the burden of proof is on you. I only claimed that Reagan is a clown, and that is my opinion. You say he created 16 millions jobs, as if it is a fact, so prove it.

>>87076259
I like how most people don't know this because he also ransacked the fourth estate.

>>87076181
>dude the laws that prevented black people from moving out of black neighborhoods is the reason the infrastructure was kept so good dude
>dude laws banning indians and blacks from using "white" hospitals is what kept the infrastructure in such good shape
>dude the law banning blacks from attending university is what kept babies from being raped dude lmao

Do you even know what you are talking about, or do you just parrot infographics and memes from /pol/? "lel let's post that image of the black guy begging for white farmers to come back things were so much better right guys?" I guess if I thrived on non-sequitir like you seem to, I could justify anything.

>>87076735
>that image of the black guy begging for white farmers to come back things were so much better right guys?
that's the President of Zimbabwe

>>87076805
It works though, because in a pol-tard's mind, there's no difference anyway.

File: Harare_Skyline[1].jpg (220KB, 604x266px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 604x266px

>>87076833
can I ask who built this? was it Africans?

>>87076947
there you go again with the non-sequitir. I'd love to see your thought-process as it jumps away from the questions its asked.

>Brits make laws to prevent blacks from using hospitals or universities, intermarrying, and whatnot
>isn't this shitty?
>HURR DURR DID DA AFRICANS BILD THIS BUILDING CHECKMATE LIBTARD

>>87077037
Maybe if Africa was so great they would have built their own university. But nope, they had to wait until a better people came over and showed them how to ride a fucking horse.

>>87077220
>region with no native horses
>lul this retard can't ride a horse

Ebin. simply ebin. I wish I could be as satisfied as you are with such complex thoughts doing Olympic gymnastics inside my noggin.

It's a good thing corrupt governments and businesses can play you race-mongers (sorry, "race realists" or whatever) like a fiddle. All they need to tell you is that darkie is coming to fuck your nonexistent gf and you get down on your knees for a fresh load.

>>87076947
>>87077220
This is your average /pol/tard. You guys have the list of logical fallacies in your sticky, and you still spew shit like this. I suggest going back to your containment board and actually reading the sticky.

>>87075823
If Reagan was bad so is every other president since, they've all just been worse continuations of his policies (Trump remains to be seen).

>>87077407
The /pol/ user says "Why read when you can feel?" If you feel it it must be true, after all.

>>87077391
>>region with no native horses
what's a zebra?

>>87075829
>arguing with myself over things no one said
>still doesn't directly address the question

lol

>>87077407
you're the one defending a bunch of niggers who ain't ever done shit based on "w-well they could've if it wasn't for the Brits who built them everything"

Bill Gates can't kill these Africans fast enough

>>87075367
What metric are you using? Employment rate per capita was higher under Reagan.

File: 1488570464153.png (71KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 251x251px

>>87079202
Time for you to stop posting

>>87076259
How did he deliver a mortal blow? He did things like deregulating airlines so the middle class could actually afford to fly, instead of just the rich.

File: Just Walk Away.jpg (56KB, 580x325px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 580x325px

>>87077449
>>87077407
>>87077037
>>87076833
>>87076735
What the fuck is this? "If I act super meta and don't actually argue any points I'll appear intellectually superior". No, you're not actually making any points. You're sitting there saying "WOW LOOK AT WHAT HE THINKS WHO WOULD THINK THAT" or "HAHA HE KEEPS ASKING ME QUESTIONS WHEN I DON'T ANSWER HIM" but that's not an actual argument. You can't make an actual argument against what he's saying. You criticize what he says but you offer nothing in place of it. I'm sorry bud, but if you can't offer an opposing viewpoint, it's because what he's saying here is closer to the truth than whatever untenable position you hold.

>>87075653
Look up FRED numbers, labour participation rate, employment rate.

Didn't white percentage drop like from 70% to 60% under Reagan?

>>87079421
"lol niggers" is not an argument, and even if it was one, it wouldn't be worthy of a serious answer.

>>87075055
Problem people had was it mocked people with Alzheimer's, not so much that it mocked Ronald Reagan.

>>87079366
if you actually believe that, you're a fucking idiot

>>87079451
It has been the argument for literally centuries. Why change it now?

File: 1c6a1638176252f6ef25f98ae350e7c72e01a20b2425e984507624bb3f105214.png (850KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

850KB, 960x720px

>>87079451
Yeah that's what he ended up saying after you gave him non-arguments for a few posts. How can you expect and argument against a non-argument? He should have called you on your bullshit after one post from you, you're a pseudo-intellectual tumor.

>>87075329
he was Bush's puppet

File: 24wa5aw.gif (3MB, 598x336px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 598x336px

>>87075436

File: air12.jpg (26KB, 528x393px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 528x393px

>>87079492
Reagan policies deregulated airlines.
There is empirical evidence that previously rising airline costs fell after the deregulating of airlines, and that's despite inflation which naturally increases prices. This destroyed the salaries of airline pilots and stewardess's, but made flying possible for the rest of us. Same with the deregulating of agriculture lowering the price of food.
How am I an idiot? Use evidence to back your statement please.

>>87079451
Yeah and "le white man keepin da black man down" isnt a good one either especially in current day South Africa

>>87076247
Seems to be working with how bloody your rectum is. :^)

>>87079768
Nowhere did anyone say anything remotely close to "le white man keepin da black man down".

>>87079806
THe argument against apartheid sure was.

>>87079903
If you support apartheid at all then all we can really do in response is laugh at you. Supporting apartheid is not an argument, it's halfway to supporting slavery.

>>87075653
Sanctions are anti freedom

>>87080121
Segregation of niggers is even more so.

>>87080027
you're right South Africa is so much better without it.

>>87080160
Yes but we weren't doing that, SA was

>>87074900
I think it's hilarious how alt-right late-millennials and generation Z glorify Reagan when he completely destroyed the American economy and the middle class.

>>87075122
Reagan deserves little respect for the role he played in the War on Drugs

>>87080203
The Alt-right hate him because they blame him for giving amnesty to illegals.

>>87080027
Supporting apartheid is an argument, what's not an argument is your post.

>>87079616
Ah, a true intellectual I see
(That was a sarcastic remark, you seem way too invested in this thread. Perhaps you ought to leave this website, it is poisoning your mind with reductive viewpoints based on wild emotion)

>>87080203
Uh huh.
I'm sure your ideas of Venezuela and Zimbarbwe tier socialism would do wonders for the middle class.

>>87075368
>>87075313
>>87075122
Obama is virtually unassailable until we get more minority presidents.

File: da24fc5fd8175f328f13609e9a1c6df8fe22f3d3fb01c495f5410cb02a41c2d7.jpg (14KB, 224x216px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 224x216px

>>87080875
>Anyone who calls me on my bullshit should leave because they're too invested in this thread
Wew lad. No shit it was a sarcasm, that's the entire point. All you've done is make fun of other people's arguments without making an argument yourself, assumedly because you have none. Your posts are the biggest argument in favor of apartheid in this entire thread.

>>87075313
>TLJ: Literally incapable of humor
>what is Natural Born Killers
>what is Men in Black
>what is BATMAN FUCKING FOREVER

>>87080875
I love how you completely skipped over the South Africa argument. I'd love to send you there and see how long it is until your world view has changed completely. Keep living in your bubble.