ITT Everything Kubrick

>>86950847
How do we know he's even dead, has anyone see n his body?

This fat fuck is trash.

File: cTZYEuP.jpg (144KB, 772x1000px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 772x1000px

>>86950916

theory: self-loathing jew.

File: StanleyKubrickGreatPhoto.jpg (17KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 600x300px

>>86950956
kek

is Eyes Wide Shut a good movie or is it just Tom Cruise mugging the camera for 2 hours?

File: IMG_0581.gif (492KB, 400x230px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 400x230px

>>86950948

File: 101002201.png (468KB, 747x421px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 747x421px

>>86950948
He's in cryosleep

>>86950847
retarded goy

File: stanleykubrick_lolita1962.jpg (29KB, 702x401px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 702x401px

Kubrick was a based alpha

File: jack.jpg (20KB, 767x574px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 767x574px

A nigger?

File: MV5BMTIwMzAwMzg1MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwMjc4ODQ2._V1_UX214_CR00214317_AL_.jpg (16KB, 214x317px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 214x317px

Fantastic director, how bout some film rankings, Lads? For me it's
1. Barry Lyndon
2. The Shining
3. Full Metal Jacket
4. 2001
5. Dr. Strangelove
6. A Clockwork Orange

Haven't seen Spartacus or Eyes wide shut desu senpai, what am I missing

File: tumblr_ndxb06xCzu1tyfqs1o1_500.gif (711KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 500x281px

>>86951060
It's a really good movie about Tom Cruise mugging the camera for 2 hours

>>86951188
1. The Shining
2. Eyes Wide Shut
3. 2001
4. A Clockwork Orange
5. Dr. Strangelove

too lazy to dump it

here
http://imgur.com/a/tTWlw

File: 3OqnJ4J.jpg (318KB, 1172x1317px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1172x1317px

>>86951188
Spartacus is worth watching but you're not missing out.
EWS is a must

I'd have to go with

1. 2001, Barry Lyndon
2. The Shining, Dr. Strangelove, Eyes Wide shut
3. A Clockwork Orange, Full Metal Jacket, Paths of Glory, The Shining
4. Lolita, The Killing, Spartacus

File: 1YUBXJ5.jpg (189KB, 1000x683px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1000x683px

>>86951264
Thx anon

>>86951188
if your 2 favorites are those you are definitely missing out on EWS

File: giphy.gif (1021KB, 500x272px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 500x272px

He passed on too early

Does AI count as a Kubrick film?

File: Stanley-Kubrick-filming-Moon-Landing-Hoax-125317.jpg (263KB, 1000x731px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1000x731px

Why are some people convinced he filmed the moonlanding? It can't just be The Shining stuff.

File: e2hO8gT.jpg (187KB, 1000x682px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1000x682px

>>86951499
No, he wasn't involved in the production, nor in the filming. I wish he had tho

>>86951549
2001 just looked too good and freaked everybody out. They did do an amazing job with the physics, not just setpieces

>>86951601
Fair enough. All true. But I still see people say that

>>86951549
Probably because he had a camera that was made by nasa

File: 18w326ld5xyy5jpg.jpg (57KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 800x450px

>>86951695
It was the lens, but I get your point

File: tumblr_mngleiihCL1qgio1po1_500.gif (500KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 500x281px

>>86950847
Crashing this thread

File: dead twins close up 2.png (134KB, 411x180px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 411x180px

>>86951813
With no survivours

File: 21341242213.jpg (32KB, 473x300px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 473x300px

>>86950956

What about his death? Was he actually killed or at least threatened because of Eyes Wide Shut?
Or was it something related to the Saturn Cult

>>86950847
>>86951087
>>86951139
>>86951264

File: tumblr_ol6s9nLft21rfd7lko1_500.gif (2MB, 470x266px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 470x266px

>>86952031
lol, forgot pic

File: b22.jpg (45KB, 600x799px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x799px

>>86950847
>kubrick
>memes
wut

Who's Kubrik

File: tenor.gif (1MB, 460x230px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 460x230px

>>86951813
Should've used this one

>>86951549
Because he did....

>>86951989
What does the film say? That people in high places are decadent and deviant? No shit, Sherlock. If you only take the surface level stuff from EWS, then you are missing the point. It's literally the only Kubrick movie that is taken for face value. Just so they have fodder for some shitty illuminati theory.

>>86952670
Maybe I did, but maybe they did too. That's my point

Napoleon should've happened.

File: ce_kubrick_napoleon_11-1024x843.jpg (243KB, 1024x843px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1024x843px

>>86953176
I agree

File: dsrfgdg.jpg (104KB, 1013x600px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1013x600px

>>86953195

I wish I could see his version of AI, not the crap we got

>>86953105
Well his daughter or wife said he wanted to do a holocaust movie. But he felt that Schindler's List has already knocked it out of the park.

To go from production on that, to a musing on 90s fidelity and unfidelity. It really does seem like EWS should have a deeper meaning.

>>86953398
>>86953195
It's a shame Kubrick used the same naturalistic method to sound as he did to his photography, because the muskets firing blanks with weak charges sound like children's cap guns.

>>86950847
Mofo looks like Prof Arturo.

>>86953691
Are you aware of any forum for in depth discussions about Kurbrick or otherwise film related topics?

Dr. Strangelove has the most kino trailer of all time.

Aronofsky could've been.

Terrence Malick also, but he went off the rails

>>86953741
maybe muskets with shitty homemade ammo aren't as loud as a modern gun with factory precision ammos

>>86953741
Might be true, tho I'm no expert, but that hardly matters

File: dr-strangelove-still-580.jpg (68KB, 580x393px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 580x393px

I hated Strangelove. What's with the shitty CGI

>>86953785
I don't. I just take what I can get here.

>>86954197
That's a shame. Thanks

File: source.gif (1MB, 560x328px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 560x328px

>>86954234
True kino

>>86953176
despite barry lyndon being based on an existing novel and kubrick's screenplay for napoleon being based on historical records the two stories are remarkably similar, to the point where scenes in napoleon are actually repurposed for barry lyndon.

>>86953679
what do you think would've been different about it?

>>86953691
>To go from production on that, to a musing on 90s fidelity and unfidelity. It really does seem like EWS should have a deeper meaning.

it's based on a novel from the 1920s that's about the 1900s and kubrick had wanted to make it since the 1970s. kubrick discussed the original work's timelessness with the co-writer of the screen adaptation. even so, when EWS first came out one of the big criticisms of it was that kubrick was out of touch and the movie's sexual mores were ridiculously outdated (the people who said this were wrong)

>>86951549
Because after the propaganda fueled WW2 and up to the current information age, it was easy af to control information to the public. "Historic records" covering this time period are always going to be met with controversy in the future because it is a time of centralized and heavily controlled propaganda. The truth? What is that? It's whatever the news tells you, and who controls that?

At least now we have a much larger pool of information to keep us informed, but it's still a game of "he said she said".

>>86954524
About AI
His direction obviously, the movie would look nothing like Spielberg's flawed attempt

>>86950847
Pretentious hack
MUH SPACE ODDISSEY LE KINO XDXDXD

>>86953741
There's not enough smoke either.

>>86950847
I wish I could sleep the way Kubrick did. I think his wife said that he slept only 4 or 5 hours a night.

File: hartman_fullmetaljacket.jpg (204KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1920x1080px

>>86954638
Very original.
Leave

>>86953691
>kubrick holocaust movie

That would have been nice to see. I'm sure he would have presented it in a less bias way, and not the standard Hollywood trope of "supreme evil vs the good guys". Schindler's List basically made it pointless to make one at that time though as it was given tons of attention in the media and basically stands as a "historic" record for the masses, even being shown in history classes to "teach" the kids what those bad germans did. Kubrick was probably aware of what the movie was, but saying anything publicly against it would be absolute career suicide.

>>86954768
Prove me wrong
Pro tip: You can't

File: You.gif (19KB, 234x230px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 234x230px

>>86954638

>>86953854
They're much louder actually

>>86954809
>even being shown in history classes to "teach" the kids what those bad germans did

Even though the protagonist and hero was a German, and Nazi party member?

File: ety.jpg (17KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 540x304px

>>86954638

>>86954620
whatever. spielberg inherited kubrick's concept art and storyboards and was faithful to them. the moving mastershots spielberg's famous for are in AI, and yeah they're not like how kubrick covered a scene, but they are executed well and help tell the story. there isn't some revelatory different version of AI that would exist with the same material if only spielberg had done a 1:1 job of emulating kubrick (which sounds like the most artistically dull shit ever).

File: d5309fbc9a8c43894a170aeb60e361ed.gif (2MB, 400x239px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x239px

>>86954638

>>86951188
nice digits
1 - eyes wide shut
2 - the shining
3 - 2001
4 - dr. strangelove
5 - barry lyndon
6 - clockwork orange

all of them maybe except spartacus and the ones before it are masterpieces

>>86955552
Nice list

File: 520059222_1280x720.jpg (79KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1280x720px

>>86955350
>and was faithful to them
No it wasn't. It was entirely unmemorable except for the ending and the scenes with Jude Law.
The lighting and cinematography make it look like a 90s direct to VHS movie.
Jude is surprisingly good at playing a robot gigolo though.

>>86950847
Real talk, Clockwork Orange its his worst movie literally Tumblr also is fucking overrated.

>>86955621
Yeah. It was bad and Spielberg is a good director. Why do you think it ended up being so bland?

>>86954809
>Kubrick was probably aware of what the movie was, but saying anything publicly against it would be absolute career suicide.

http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/sk/page12a.htm

>F.R.: (knowing damn well what he is being urged to get to): Well, there's "Schindler's List," isn't there?

>S.K.: Think that was about the Holocaust?

>F.R.: Wasn't it? What else was it about?

>S.K.: That was about success, wasn't it? The Holocaust is about six million people who get killed. "Schindler's List" was about six hundred people who don't.

>>86955678
With the risk of sounding pretentious, it is really close to visualizing the world that the book created. It's riddled with subtlety and if you embrace the setting, the rest sinks in nicely. It really is great, tho far from his best one

File: picture-104.png (705KB, 811x572px) Image search: [Google]

705KB, 811x572px

>>86955685
Spielberg never understood Kubrick.
Spielberg makes syrupy blockbusters
Kubrick makes morally ambiguous films shot in a realistic, almost documentary style.
Every spielberg movie has this romantic glorification going on. I don't have the right word to describe it, but it is incompatible with Kubrick's perspective.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B62f1gQliLY

File: Walgreens Exclusive.jpg (605KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 1080x1080px

>>86950847
What would Kubrick think of this?

File: 158.png (15KB, 447x378px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 447x378px

>>86955788
> The Holocaust is about six million people who get killed. "Schindler's List" was about six hundred people who don't.
This is the difference between Stephen and Stanley.

>>86955840
You are absolutely right
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B62f1gQliLY
I remember seeing this before
He truly seems to understand him on a very superficial level
Such a shame about AI.

1. 2001
2. The Shining
3. Barry Lyndon
4. Dr.Strangelove
5. Clockwork
6. Paths of Glory
7. FMJ
8. Spartacus
9. Lolita

Haven't seen EWS and The killing yet.

>>86956009
Perfect. You really should see EWS

>>86955621
>No it wasn't.

yeah it was. i own the fucking making of book with chris baker's art.

>>86951188
1. Barry Lyndon
>just because it's a ritual of mine to watch it every Christmas eve when I go back to my parents house, comfy af
2. 2001
3. Dr. Strangelove
4. A Clockwork Orange
5. Paths of Glory
6. The Shining
7. Eyes Wide Shut
8. Full Metal Jacket

>>86956059
Waiting till I have a gf so we can watch it together.

Why do people on /tv/ dislike Kubrick and call him reddit?

Legit asking

>>86956091
It does give you that snug and warm sensation. God I love it. It's really humorous as well

File: hqdefault.jpg (8KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x360px

>>86956081
no it really wasn't good.
Haley joel osment is good.
Some of the physical effects are good.
Jude Law is good.
I couldn't tell you what else i liked about it. I thought the set design and lighting made it feel like a bad dream, which isn't what i personally want from AI.

For example: The night scenes have a very fake looking lighting scheme that i believe detracts from the overall tone of the movie. In addition, theres this filter Spielberg likes to use where light has a sort of "bloom" effect. a glow around the edges. It works in certain cases, but he uses it like Abrams uses lens flare.

>>86956009
>2001
Seen it
>The Shining
Seen it
>Barry Lyndon
Seen it
>Dr. Strangelove
Haven't seen it
>Clockwork
Seen it
>Paths of Glory
Haven't seen it
>FMJ
Seen it
>Spartacus
Haven't seen it
>Lolita
Seen it

>>86956114
Not sure if you're joking, but not really that type of film tho haha

>>86956124
Not sure, it's confusing, I never see Kubrick thread here tho, that's why I started the two currently open ones
>86950847

>>86956009
>haven't seen ews
it's the only film that matters. i stopped taking film as a serious medium after i saw ews.

>>86956124
Edgy memelords. Ignore them.
Most people realize more or less how important Kubrick was

>>86956244
Why not? I thought it was a great film for couples.

where my ews conspiracy bros at?

>>86953785
>>86954197
>>86954231
Rob Ager (guy who does film analysis on youtube, the best I've seen) has a forum.
http://www.collativelearning.com/mybb_1401/Upload/index.php
a lot of old threads were recently deleted by some shit mod though. http://www.collativelearning.com/mybb_1401/Upload/showthread.php?tid=9579
also has a bot problem. I've seen good discussion there though

>>86956356
Still not sure if you're sarcastic. I'd assume you are, but let me mention that it deals with infidelity and lusting over other people. Tho you probably know that already

>>86956420
Thank you very much. I appreciate it

>>86956228
i didn't say it was good. i said it was faithful to the concept art and storyboards.

https://vimeo.com/156460364

Just posting this because it's brilliant

>>86955845
he wouldn´t give a flying fuck about it, he knew his art was beyond that.

>>86956633
How have I not seen this before? it's brilliant, thanks for sharing.

>tfw seeing the mansion scene in EWS for the first time
Did I.... just get kinoe'd?

>>86956799
You absolutely did, haha

>>86956702
>>86956633
faggot detected

>>86956420
>Rob Ager

this guy makes the dweebs in room 237 seem like geniuses

>>86956633
Should had stopped in a corner to yell at Shelly as she pulls her hair.

>>86957003
hmm. I've always enjoyed his videos. What don't you like about them in particular?

>>86957003
While some outlandish stuff seems to have merit (like the only guy that declined being interviewed), I think after they didn't get his participation, they just called up hacks on a Kubrick message board.

If you throw enough shit, some of it is bound to stick.

>>86951188
1. BL
2. PoG
3. 2001
4. FMJ
5. Dr. Strangelove
6. EWS
7. The Shining
8. Lolita
9. ACO
10. The Killing
11. Killers Kiss
12. Spartacus
13. FaD

Tbphwy, I have never seen FaD, but from what I've heard from literally everyone who has seen it, it is utter cancer. Which just puts it above Spartacus, which is putrid dogshit. Everything else ranges from ok to fantastic.

>>86957237
he did a video on Full Metal Jacket where he acted like the rosetta stone to understanding the REAL meaning of the film was this object in the background of a few shots during the sniper scene. from certain angles, it sort of looks like the monolith from 2001. he confidently spun this whole intricate theory on the movie's hidden internal symbology and thematic meaning from this one obscure part of the frame.

except...

>People always look at directors, and you in particular, in the context of a body of work. I couldn't help but notice some resonance with Paths of Glory at the end of Full Metal Jacket: a woman surrounded by enemy soldiers, the odd, ambiguous gesture that ties these people together...

>That resonance is an accident. The scene comes straight out of Gustav Hasford's book.

>So your purpose wasn't to poke the viewer in the ribs, point out certain similarities...

>Oh, God, no. I'm trying to be true to the material. You know, there's another extraordinary accident. Cowboy is dying, and in the background there's something that looks very much like the monolith in 2001. And it just happened to be there.

>The whole area of combat was one complete area -- it actually exists. One of the things I tried to do was give you a sense of where you were, where everything else was. Which, in war movies, is something you frequently don't get. The terrain of small-unit action is really the story of the action. And this is something we tried to make beautifully clear: there's a low wall, there's the building space. And once you get in there, everything is exactly where it actually was. No cutting away, no cheating. So it came down to where the sniper would be and where the marines were. When Cowboy is shot, they carry him around the corner -- to the very most logical shelter. And there, in the background, was this thing, this monolith. I'm sure some people will think that there was some calculated reference to 2001, but honestly, it was just there.

>>86957924
http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/amk/doc/0077.html

File: 5-ffa2cce51d[1].jpg (245KB, 733x968px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 733x968px

>>86957966
William Hogarth, Marriage A-La-Mode, 1743

File: tumblr_o4rpu9WfPw1usuqlbo1_1280.jpg (150KB, 1280x970px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1280x970px

>>86951188
You haven't seen Spartacus or EWS?!

1. Clock Work Orange, Barry, Shining
2. Dr. Strangelove, 2001, Paths of Glory
3. EWS, Full Metal, The Killing, Spartacus

>>86957966
God damn every single shot looks like a painting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjPSGuJskxM

>>86957237
Rob has historically been very good but his content has taken a nose dive in the last couple of years. It often feels like he's just ranting to ensure the video reaches a saleable length now.

His attempts at humor are cringe worthy as well.

>>86958319
>clockwork orange best
t. Pleb/Tumblrfaggot

>>86955678
The movie is average-tier but I can't stop listening to that soundtrack.

I didn't realize there'd be so many Clockwork Orange haters on /tv/.

>>86959043
lol

>people taking Rob Ager seriously

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

>based rob ager

I was disturbed to find out that Peter Sellers based his character in Lolita on Kubrick. Was Kubrick really like that? Quilty reminded me of Woody Allen especially in that scene at the hotel.

File: IMG_0066.jpg (346KB, 1024x498px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1024x498px

>>86952161

>>86951188
Spartacus was one of my favorite childhood movies; I don't know how good it would be now if I rewatched it though

https://vimeo.com/48425421

More like this?

HIS ONLY TWO GOOD MOVIES ARE

*drumroll*

EYES WIDE SHUT & THE SHINING

>>86960331
>t. Pleb/Tumblrfaggot
why?

>>86955845
>A Clockwork Orange
>"horror classic"

wut