>biopic runs under 90 minutes
>biopic starts at birth and ends at death
>biopic is only about one specific event in a notable figure's life
>bio-pic
>>86912389
>it leaves out the uncomfortable details
>>86912389
>biopic is about three specific events that all happen to be very similar in set up and give a good outlook on the figure's character
>the subject stars in the biopic
>>86912389
>the figure is not really notable
>the event is a curiosity at best
>>86910724
>fake biopic is better than most real ones
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99YDw5HLZSE
>casting lookalikes
>>86912466
>the subject's life is toned down because it was deemed too unrealistic for the movies
>>86912489
Got you covered pham
>>86912811
>the events from subject life get split between 5 characters excluding him as the real person was 'too inconsistent'
>>86912846
I'll cover you back.
>cute cat cures heroin addiction
>>86913027
Holy fucking shit. How did he do it?
>>86913090
>main character's cat escapes while he's going through withdrawal
>he's depressed because of that so he goes to buy some heroin, dealer asks 'What do you need?'
>after a moment he answers 'I want my cat back'
>the cat magically returns
There's also a scene with the main characters friend OD and cat playing with the heroin needle.
>>86912846
>playing it safe
Terrible
>biopic about famous biopic director
>>86913244
Now I like corny movies, but goddamn even those have some kind of standard.
>biopic
>it's about a moderately famous athlete
>for a niche game
>it's a biopic that ties directly into the subject's most famous work
>>86913369
Would've been even better if Downey was an ex safecracker, but you can't expect miracles.
>>86912466
>subject shows up as a cameo in a largely fictional adaption of their autobiography
>subject comepletely steals the scene with their charisma
>>86912811
>>86912971
What manlet should play Audie in the historically accurate remake of To Hell and Back?
>>86916164
Anton Yelchin
>biopic
>doesn't exist
>should exist
>why doesn't it exist