Where's the logic here?

read a book faggot.

>>86849113
dumbass fuck

But that's how things work in space since there is no gravity and ships weigh 0. The small ship easily moves the big one as there is neither gravity nor air to stop it.

>>86849113
I love 60 FPS

>try to push massive ship into other massive ship. >all it does is push the 2nd massive ship to.

>>86849199
And I love you. :)

>>86849177
but the other 2 ships could have used their engines to push their ships STRAIGHT and out of the way.... it doesn't make sense

Where's this from?

>>86849113
deus ex machina

>>86849291
Valerian

>>86849199
I have smooth video project play whenever I watch something, it's great. Makes me eyes hurt when I watch something normally in 24FPS though

>>86849291
Star Trek

>>86849284
I guess they were surprised and in addition their engines are on the back so they can only accelerate or stop their orbit. Nothing on the sides to counteract what's happening in the scene.

>>86849113
>logic
>Star Wars

>>86849177
>what is mass

>>86849113
>logic
>SW
pick one

>>86849113
>Where's the logic here?

High school level Newtonian physics

>>86849113
the small ship approaches so fast that by all logic it should have turned into a wreck

unless it was built for ramming but it sure does not look like it

anyway

>physics in a fantasy movie

>>86849341
why didn't the rebels just do this all the time?

Don't Star Destroyers have shields?

Same logic that allows an A-Wing to take out an SSD.

>>86849113
Physicist here: this kinda makes sense because of conservation of momentum, but the mass ( and propulsion) of the small ship is probably too small

>>86849113
>anon gets triggered by a webm as the empirecuck he is

loving every laugh

>>86849341
Which shows the failure of the design, how does a star destroyer turn?

Who would win, a 6,400,000 ton 1,600 meter vessel or a 400 ton 315 meter vessel?

>>86849431
laziness of the writers. they're trained to write superhero movies not science fiction.

>>86849291
>>86849331
>>86849339
Stop memeing it's clearly Guardians of the Galaxy vol. 2

>>86849397

Shields in SW have always been weird, they're either incredible weak or they just don't bother putting in the effect

>>86849487
upvoted and reddit golded!

>>86849467
with no gravity or friction dumbass but the structural integrity of a supposed centuries old ship design

Why didn't they just produce a fleet of hammerheads ships and ram the death star to the sun?

>>86849113
I am no expert but wouldn't the first Star Destroyer just push the second one out of the way too?

>>86849532
Yeah I was thinking that, hammerheads cost a fraction of what a star destroyer does, just make a fleet of them piloted by cheap droids and go wild

They specifically point out the ship lost power to the thrusters.

>>86849532
Why didn't they just produce a Super-Star-Hammehead and ram the planets into each other?

>>86849573
That'll be episode 9

File: 9223dd5573c7ae4821a267a1af176cd7.gif (1017KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 500x650px

>>86849113
WHERES THE LOGIC HERE?

>>86849532
iirc Death Star is like planet, has it's own gravity field n sheeit

>>86849113
This doesn't make any sense:
- Why is biggy1 pushed by tiny, but not biggy2 by biggy1?
- Why does biggy1 damage biggy2 on contact, while tiny is probably much weaker and would have been crushed into biggy1 before the latter began to penetrate biggy2's hull?

If the tiny ship at fairly high speed moves the big ship, why doesnt the big ship move the other big ship? It destroys it instead. Looks like 2nd big ship is stuck in space.

why didn't the death star just ram aldderan into the sun.

dude fuck Inertia lmao

*drives a planet into another planet with a frigate*

>>86849653
Why did the Starkiller base exploded in 1st part of the trilogy?

>>86849647
because the mass at that speed overwhelmed the structure

>>86849341
Their engines still should be far far stronger than that of a frigate. so just pushing forwards at full thrust could have avoided the collision.

>>86849397
I always imagined "deflector shields" to be what the name implies. A force field that pushes projectiles away. More about deflecting the blast, like how sloped tank armor works. But you are one-shot if the opppnent gets the well angled and aimed shot in.

>>86849599
The force is female.

>>86849599
You're comparing the force, something that has rules based in the SW universe to a dumb scene where something happens for no reason. It would have actually made more sense if somebody on board the hammerhead was a force user because at least then it would make sense using the established rules of the universe

>>86849671
It's not inertia, it's the law of gravity: one object influence the other proportionally to its mass and the other mass ratio. A ship would have an influence on a planet, but so small it wouldn't change anything.
Inertia is due to the gravity field of Earth (or other big object) in regards to the dynamics of tiny ones (you and me).

>>86849602
Well every object with mass, even your penis, has a gravitational field. You can still push a planet and whatnot, you only need more force demending on the bjects mass.

>>86849783
>Inertia is due to the gravity field of Earth (or other big object) in regards to the dynamics of tiny ones (you and me)

t. retard

Inertia is a property of an object with mass that resists the change of motion.

>>86849839
>tfw your penis could theoretically turn into a black hole with enough mass

>>86849913
> with enough mass

it just would have to be compressed enough so the escape velocity would exceed the speed of light.

File: 3e5044679f1f4fc17272119e6e8c8f79.jpg (46KB, 999x924px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 999x924px

>>86849532
>fleet of hammerheads
>approaching the death star like a swarm of bees
>*cut to death star control room* "Captain, there seems to be an asteroid field appro-...wait...those aren't-...*panic* *push emergency button*
>"Luitentent, ready the shield and fire blasters...we can neutralize them easi-.."
>"they're changing course Captain..."
>*confused*..."why would they b-...wait...Luitentent zoom in on tha-...JUSES CHRIST!!!"
>"those aren't hammerheads...those are Tug-sters...they we're tugging a...a...nuetron star..."
>*death star on full alert, everyone panicing*
>"What should we do Captain..."
>"Pray Luitentent...pray."

STAR WARS

>>86849467

Tons don't matter in place where there's no air.

>>86849970

You're right, push the moon then

>>86849970
fucking retard, of course the mass matters

>>86849984
The moon has gravity so obviously it won't work that easily there.

>Burger Education

>>86850015
Everything that has mass has gravity

ITT: brainlets who have zero understanding of simple physics

how does the destroyer smash through another destroy like they are both made of paper
but the tiny ship with great force does not tunnel through it?

>>86849963
>CAPTAIN THERE'S SWARM OF ASTEROIDS FIELD APPRO-
>dramatic music
>Those aren't asteroids!
>music intesifies
>Those are ships!

>>86850086
I'm honestly not aware of a single movie that ever depicted space with decent physics that's not boats in a bucket of black liquid sitting side by side with ww1 biplanes slowly buzzing around them that occasionally "fly below" for dramatic effect.

>>86850099

I can believe it and I can already picture the collective sexual groans of the star wars fans watching

>>86850214
I'm not saying the clip above or any movie is accurately depicting physics, only that the people here trying to rationalize it in one way or another are retards.

File: 1481790508506.jpg (19KB, 464x302px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 464x302px

>>86849177
so why doesnt the big one just push the big one instead of destroying it, if there is no weight?

>>86850091
>how does the destroyer smash through another destroy like they are both made of paper
>but the tiny ship with great force does not tunnel through it?
This is what the star jews defending this scene are truly missing

File: 2973fe6a435335f08e3d3eeb3a4b52e246ec4d77aca523c71423406363779c38.jpg (19KB, 600x357px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 600x357px

>the current year
>still sound in space

>>86849113
As far as I remember that first Destroyer was kinda disabled, right?

>>86850286

We can see the frigate pushes the star destroyer down toward the planet so gravity is at play here.

Think of it as person pushing a car downhill with someone parked further down.

Obviously he won't sink into the car when he pushes, but when the moving car hits the one that is parked...

>>86850347
just like you lmao nerd

>>86850346
Just mute the audio during a space scene

>>86850346
>science fantasy
Also studios know normies need to hear pew pew lasers and explosions to keep interested.

I don't see any equivalent-sized thrusters on the sides of the star destroyer. It's hard to argue proportionality when we don't know the actual force of the rocket engine.

A star destroyer would have lateral repulser engines way more powerful than the main engine of one of those tiny republic ships.

>>86849423
>Physicist here:
stopped reading right there. fuck off.

>>86850537
But this Star Destroy went offline they literally YELL that in the fucking movie

Y-wing squadron fired ion torpedos into Star Destroyer thats why it was not moving. Watch the movie.

>>86850726
>Watch the movie.
never

>>86850726

But BOTH Star Destroyers weren't moving.

>>86850726
Ok sure and then they ram it into a Star Destroyer with fully operational shields, sheilds that have been shown to repulse asteroids

>>86850894

You'd think that if that were possible they'd just build giant 'space battering ram' ships.

>>86849113
>smaller things can push bigger things
>bigger thing moves and builds up momentum
>hits other star destroyer with its armored triangle section right at the weaker superstructure and shaves it off

>>86849113

Is this the actual movie or a videogame recreation?

Did it look this bad?

>>86850214
>>86850214
https://youtu.be/aZnaxdZu2eo?t=1m50s
Was it dogfightkino?

>both ships are traveling forward with constant thrust
>one ship stops thrusting, the other does not
>the one that's still increasing in velocity doesn't quickly outpace the other

Lol

>something with less than 1/100th the mass begins pushing on adrift object
>easily overcomes it's inertia and mass
>forces the adrift object to move at such speed that it cuts through the other accelerating object

>two ships against a armada of three dozen ships
>they position themselves within 100m of each other

Everything about this scene was retarded

>>86849354
Not weight.

>>86849113
what is the problem?

>>86849113
Is this an old movie?

It looks completely foreign to me.

File: Game-of-Thrones_S07E06-Beyond-the-Wall-the-Night-King-spear.jpg (870KB, 3733x2100px) Image search: [Google]

870KB, 3733x2100px

Where's the logic here?

>>86849970
theres an air in space museum

Irl tugboats do this on a similiar scale idk seems legit desu

>>86849291
The Fifth Element.

>>86849390
It was built for ramming

>>86851799
BBC
Big Bumper Class

>>86850286
It is disabled

>>86850421
you can drop the science part.

>>86849113
More importantly, why would they build vulnerable parts of the shield generator on the outside of the shield where it can be attacked?

>>86852516
No, 'science fantasy' has never been beholden to facts in the same way 'science fiction' is or at least should be.
Science fantasy can get away with whatever it wants really.

>>86849113
Even for a videogame it's too retarded.

>>86849113
every other time in the SW universe that ships collided like this they both exploded. I would like consistency

>>86850099
>not moons

>>86849431

Three engines at the back, light right one to turn left, left one to turn right, all three to go forward.

Why build big expensive ships if they can just be easily destroyed by shitty inexpensive ones?

>>86849970
wew

>>86849391
>Let's use our already limited number of ships as bettering rams!

File: 4644.jpg (70KB, 248x252px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 248x252px

>Star Wars
>accurate representation of physics

Fuck off retards. The entire franchise is just hand-waving space magic. Don't be autistically butthurt about something being stupid in a children's movie.

>>86851037
>going backwards this much in a decade
I will hate disney until I die

>>86849113
Spaceballs 2 is looking good

>>86849113
This is a video game right?

>>86849341
>>86849431
All ships have maneuvering thrusters for turning. Even the dumbest movie viewer can't think a galactic empire built a ship that can only go in a straight line.

The problem is not the disabled ship being pushed, it's the second one breaking apart like tissue paper that's retarded.

>>86854634
>dumbest movie viewer
You just described the Star Wars fanbase.