What did we think of Total Recall (2012)?
i didn't watch it but i reckon it was probably not good
I don't like Colon Feral so I never saw the movie.
>>86830338
>not set on Mars
dropped
>>86831196
so what
Forgot it existed until now. Will forget again in 10 minutes.
>>86831333
Why is it so forgettable?
>>86830338
Pointless. Why remake a movie that already exists, in English, in color, by a better director with a better cast?
>>86831373
Can't recall.
It had a fun aesthetic
wasn't as bad as I thought it would be, dont remember anything about it except some goofy fight with The One Who Knocks at the end.
>>86831453
But they didn't use it at all
I got Blade Runner and Deus Ex vibes (which is good), but it lasted for first 10 minutes, everyone including the director stopped giving any fuck about the setting and aesthetic
>Let's take a sci-fi classic and remove everything that made it a classic!
>>86830338
Best part was the girl with 4 titties.
>>86830338
>biel
>beckinsale
>same movie
I enjoyed it
>>86830338
I really liked it, a fun little sci-fi action movie which was different enough from the original to keep me engaged, all the hate is just superficial shit like
>no muh arnie
>no muh mars
>>86832003
except for
>shit world building
>no motivations for the characters
>the most reused tropes ever
>>86831430
this desu, trying to remake classic verhoeven is the stupidest idea ever. it's already perfect the first time, same with robocop
>>86830338
Go back faggot.
>>86832089
Incorrect.
>>86832228
I bet you just masturbated to Beckinsale for the whole run and thought that movie was good because of that
>>86832307
No, I watched it and paid attention instead of shitposting on /tv/ while it was on.
>>86830338
Why would I have watched that?
>>86830338
Boring. The visuals were very ho-hum yet very different. I'm not sure how something with such "interesting and busy" visuals ended up with having ho-hum visuals, but they did it.
>>86832350
Are you projecting now?
>>86832307
>>86832506
Pottery.
>>86832307
Not him...but I did