Give me one reason why this thing shouldn't be fucking outlawed

some sort of weird flesh light huh

>>86791567
whats wrong with it?

Why? Red make great cameras.

File: the_revenant.jpg (59KB, 1000x338px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1000x338px

Some films like The Revenant are impossible to make with film. Only digital cameras have the capacity to film in such low light conditions.

>>86791567
Because the vimeo crowd won and they don't care about art.

>>86792695
Stanley would have words with you over that statement.

>>86791907
They really don't. I've literally never met anyone who preferred them to an Alexa.

>>86792695
>MUH NATURAL LIGHT
Fuck off.

These digital cameras are an affront to my delicate sensibilities. Movies should ONLY be made using film cameras, and ONLY using film stock manufactured before the year 2000, and ONLY with solid gold cables wrapped with diamond scrunchies to prevent contamination from ambient film-radiation and nearby cinemagnetic fields.

>>86795511
True.

This anon has standars.

If your film doesn't easily catch fire in a dry room then I don't accept it as being real.

File: fincher.jpg (13KB, 214x317px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 214x317px

>>86795233
>I've literally never met anyone who preferred them to an Alexa.

How do I into camera /tv/

>>86795766
>>>/p/vid

>>86795766
just become a gearfag cinematographer more interested in dynamic range than actually making something