new BLADE RUNNER trailer

Oh goodie. It's a CGI heavy action movie/capeshit.

File: k14eZbf.jpg (340KB, 1200x850px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1200x850px

Why is all Hollywood sci-fi just action films set in the future?

>>86785191
$$$

File: brccc.jpg (221KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1920x1080px

This is the only good shot in the entire god damn thing.

File: 1469061236602.jpg (92KB, 430x506px)

92KB, 430x506px

>>86784941
H-Hollywood is going to collapse any day now right guys

File: pepe.jpg (27KB, 399x385px)

27KB, 399x385px

>>86785520

> "good shot"

I bet Deckard dies just like Han Solo to pass off the reins to another person. Guarantee this will happen in the next Indiana Jones too.

>>86784941
>they originally wanted to release very little about movie until it released too avoid things being spoiled/ruined

>every twist has been revealed or extremly hinted at


i was gonna go see this in theater,but ill wait for blu ray rip eventually. i know everything i need to know that happens already. stupid. ive literally been waiting since 1988 when i first saw blade runner for this....

>>86785520
that looks pretentious for the sake of being pretentious though. its not a very good shot.

>>86784941

Well now it makes more sense why this movie cost $200m to make

File: y tho.jpg (865KB, 1813x2111px)

865KB, 1813x2111px

What's this trend of having a 5 second teaser before the actual trailer? I've seen this trend grow in the past couple of months.

>>86784941
>Batista is typecasted as a big guy

dropped

looks trash

>>86784941
This looks like a shitty Hollywood flick

The original was good and contained its atmosphere because it was nuanced, you had one man in a giant futuristic metropolis that amplified the loneliness and cutural incoherence of a man like deckard, he was just one man walking around a large world with a lot of well thought restraint on what we're allowed to see


This one seems like an epic Hollywood adventure about saving the world with classism themes or similar garbage ie 99% of big budget SciFi movies

File: aidan.png (540KB, 611x609px)

540KB, 611x609px

>>86785985
did someone say...

>>86784941
This movie looks bland

>>86784941
>that bland as fuck apartment
How do you mess up set design in a cyberpunk future that badly?

>>86784941
anyone else hate the 5 second pre-trailer? Its so jarring and terrible.

>>86786110
Slow science fiction and dumb mass audience don't mix together.

>>86785947
It's to get people's attention when it autoplays in someone's social media feed.

>>86784941
I hate jared leto

File: grump.jpg (75KB, 731x820px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 731x820px

> each section of the city has its own monochromatic color scheme
> maggot and insect symbolism
> four different shots of camera looking in through window of building while it rains/snows outside

At least the interiors looks comfy.

The only movie I have seen where Leto is at least medicore is American Psycho and all he does in that is get killed.

File: blade.jpg (75KB, 1440x594px)

75KB, 1440x594px

Things aren't looking good

I was hyped after the first trailer and with every new trailer my interest in this movie decreases.
The detectives' job is to stop an evil villain from constructing a replicant army now? What is this? A James Bond movie?

>>86788025
Maybe this will be another Drive and the marketing is completely different than the actual movie.
Wouldn't count on it though, looks like shit.

I thought it was about a guy buying an robotic frog for his depressed wife and dealing with wanting to fuck robots.

Should have been James Callis instead of Leto.

>>86788025
SECOND

Dislike it is "save the world" thing.

The director only makes pleb shit so don't expect anything more than a couple pretty shots.

The only decent movie he made was Sicario but even that turned into James Bond type garbage at the end.

File: sad.jpg (22KB, 480x480px)

22KB, 480x480px

>>86788859
> Arrival was pleb shit

>>86785947
Youtube ads will appear for 5 seconds before the video starts, or before you can skip it. So they have to show you cool moments and the title of the film before you go to what you're watching.

>>86785597
Hollywood be cry

So have the "Deckard is a Replicant" fags finally been BTFO? How could he still be alive if he's in this movie?

What the hell is wrong with you people? It looks good.

>>86791448
I don't think Rachel was time-limited, maybe he wasn't either.

>>86790193
luv watching ads before watching an ad. Best time was had watching an ad before a teaser for a trailer for a movie

>>86784941
Can someone explain to me how the fuck this is managing to look flatter, blander and plain worse than the 1983 flick?
>yes blade runner is kind of a visionary masterpiece
>but that only means you don't hack out the follow up
>yes I'm calling villeneuve a hack

>>86785947
>>86790193
>what is ublock origin
>even ios has an adblocker in [current year]

File: 1500052150247.jpg (20KB, 319x374px)

20KB, 319x374px

>>86792868
Why do you talk like you're from Reddit? Why are you acting like calling a pleb director a "hack" is something transgressive?

>>86792945
>muh reddit boogeyman
shut the fuck up and look at how sterile looking this movie is

Studios do what they need to do to fill seats. In Villeneuve I trust. Sicario and Prisoners trailers also looked more 'actiony' than the final products.

>tfw Blade Runner is one of my favorite films
>tfw have zero hope for this unnecessary sequel living up to the original

>>86784941
Looks great. Only problem I might have with it is Harrison Ford phoning in another performance.

File: trash.jpg (277KB, 1280x1079px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1280x1079px

>>86793195
>villeneuve fags will defend this

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (167KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1920x1080px

>>86784941

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

(((they))) total recalled it .... fuckers

i just knew this was going to happen

>>86787920
Only God can Forgive 2: Neo-Tokyo

>>86793741
I won't. I have no fucking idea who thought that costume or set design was OK. Jesus fucking Christ